Recent content by Mihail

Oh, thank you very much!

Switching roles It is very good. I like switching roles: first A tickles B, then B tickles A. It is justice!

Well, I cannot say that "nothing like", but it is not worse than others.

Classic or not - I do enjoy tickling pictures! Thank you very much, drew70!

Facial expressions In the photos # 302 and 305 I liked very much the facial expression of the ticklee, but not the tickler.

I also would like to see such pictures. And kiss and tickle both the tickler's breasts and the victim's feet. Both of them are lovely.

Finger tickling And my favorite too. Because when you tickle someone with fingers (or toes, or tongue), you feel the ticklee's skin, there is a tactile contact of bodies!

Genitalogical Photograpy Well, I cannot call myself "a big fan" of it, but I think that genitals are simply a part of our body - not better and not worse than any other part. And like anything else, they can be beautiful and can be ugly. So I do not think that genitals are something shameful...

Vaginal tickling Yes, a vagina is such a soft and tender spot that it causes a wish to tickle it with something equally soft and tender: fingers with shortly cut nails (to avoid scratching), a tongue, a piece of fur, a soft feather or a paintbrush. Mm...

Naked tickle session Oh, a naked tickle session - it is splendid! When a naked girl tickles her naked friend - how do I wish to join them (also being naked)! First they both will tickle me, then I shall tickle them. And hug. And kiss. And tell them that they are the best girls in the world!

Naked but in high heels? And in bed? No, it is not in my taste. I prefer bare feet - to kiss, to lick and, of course, to tickle them.

So did I So did I - fell in love with all ticklers and all ticklees.

Agree Of course! And if these playful ticklers will be also naked, I would be even more glad! And after the tickling session I would ask them: "Shall we meet again for another session?"

The two last pictures in the post "700551-700555" are the same: both are 700555, and 700554 is omitted. Is it possible to correct the mistake?

Thank you for the link. The interview itself is in my native Russian language, so the English subtitles are not needed for me.