I saw the questions before the tweets were protected (bit slack mate - sorry I mean emwalshy1) and thought initially it was a deliberate (albeit rubbish) attempt to lull the celebrity into answering the question.
My apologies if your are not emwalshy1 but before the tweets were hidden the tickle ones were a perfect clone of the ones you used to send. I do have to question if you are not emwalshy1 how you stumbled on the answers especially if you'd not seen the questions and also that you have only reported answers to your own questions in the past. Also, neither @calebdowning85 or @karlymhuggins have their tweets hidden.
I know all the answers you have provided up until this point were genuine and that is not in question but quite simply the questions being asked by emwalshy1 seem to be deliberately designed to get an answer that could be used to answer the how ticklish on a scale of 1-10 question. Tina O'Brian is never going to answer that question. Her past response made that clear.
I'm not putting a downer on things as I thought the results you obtained were fantastic but enough is enough. Firstly, the repeated spamming was starting to look sleazy and then when NoMoreFreaks (or whatever that idiot who probably wears his undies outside his trousers is called) starting telling the celebs not to answer and was referring back to this forum it made us all look a bit sleazy. Secondly, someone, and I my suspicions who, is trying to hoodwink us by asking a mixture of questions with the answer a number 1-10 of which very few are the ticklishness question.
If you can't see the question and the stand alone answer doesn't mention being ticklish then it shouldn't be posted here. At best, you've been hoodwinked too.
I'll see if my follow request gets accepted as then I will be able to see what the questions were. I'm not holding my breath.
Have a nice day now.
s