AI usage to create tickle content

[Desolate]

Given the pretty impressive leaps in AI image generating capabilities, I couldn't help but wonder if anybody else has considered or attempted to tickle content using any of them?

Through my own lacklustre effortless research, most image gen websites have NSFW filters, and the few that don't aren't exactly winning any awards for their ability to follow instructions.

Obviously the ethical elephant in the room cannot be ignored with the influx of undress ai's out there, but at least with our niche, it's not uncommon for people to still have clothes on.

 

[duderino84]

The best I find is grinning AI generated women with pornpen.ai

 

[BlueLine7045]

To answer your question, yes. If you visit the TMF tickling stories section, you will see more and more AI-written tickling stories on there. What's interesting is that the person posting the story also includes their name as if they had anything to do with the authoring of the story other than asking a machine to write a story for them, part of which probably analyzed and used other people's fetish works to create a "new" story.

If you can't tell, I am not really a big fan of AI. I realize it is the future and there is no stopping it now, but that doesn't mean I have to like or embrace it. And as far as I am concerned, AI art is theft. There's actually a lawsuit that was just brought forward over on DeviantArt against DA itself and an AI company, and another party or two by several DA creators that feel their art has been plagiarized by AI. I say good.

AI is bad for the future. Good for the rich who will fully take advantage of it. Probably many benefits for humanity in the long term, but a lot of people will lose their jobs and so on. AI is even moving into the creative industry now. Artists, musicians, writers, producers, no one is safe.

 

[GummyBear]

To answer your question, yes. If you visit the TMF tickling stories section, you will see more and more AI-written tickling stories on there. What's interesting is that the person posting the story also includes their name as if they had anything to do with the authoring of the story other than asking a machine to write a story for them, part of which probably analyzed and used other people's fetish works to create a "new" story.

Yeah that's basically it. I asked the AI Chat app how it writes the stories and it said something to the effect of it having a vast library of stories to hand and it just cobbles stuff together using all of that data. It's incapable of creating any new stories, but it can put them together as if they were so. I used it a lot for a few weeks before the whole morality police thing started to wear a bit thin. I don't know if my sanity could handle having to read "Ad an AI language model..." one more time, tbh.

 

[BlasterMaster]

Absolutely not. A.I. art generation steals artwork from artists. I refuse to use it or enjoy it.

 

[BlueLine7045]

Yeah that's basically it. I asked the AI Chat app how it writes the stories and it said something to the effect of it having a vast library of stories to hand and it just cobbles stuff together using all of that data. It's incapable of creating any new stories, but it can put them together as if they were so. I used it a lot for a few weeks before the whole morality police thing started to wear a bit thin. I don't know if my sanity could handle having to read "Ad an AI language model..." one more time, tbh.

Definitely sounds like plagiarism to me. At this stage in AI technology, it's all plagiarism. Not trying to come down on anyone, but I do kinda find it sad that people who have never produced any type of art or stories themselves are crawling out of the woodwork now using AI generators to create fetish art and stories for themselves. Then they turn around and act like they wrote or did something impressive. You're prompting a machine to do all the hard work for you.

10 times out of 10 I would prefer a human-written story any day