Bella, this post reminds me of a long debate I got into with somebody in the old chatroom. I'll spare you the gory details, but the concept of tracking the ticklishness of celebrities inherently disturbs me. Precisely, I believe, for the reasons you state; tickling is a personal thing that over-eager "fans" of the activity try to rationalize into being no big deal so that they can impede upon other people's privacy and/or personal space so that they may explore that person intimately.
This was a response from Phineas in the thread undesire touching/tickling. I thought this deserved a thread of its own, so I am going to post bella and my response here as well.
Quoted by iggyI don't know why you have such a problem with this, since most of the information is found in chats with celebs. The celeb has the choice whether or not they want to answer this question. I would be concerned if someone advocating breaking into a star's home to find out if she was ticklish, or sending out a secret agent to go tickle her. I do agree with you on the barefoot statement though. A lot of people walk around barefoot and it is not because they secretly want to be tickled. I alway thought that line of reasoning was ridiculous. Walking around barefoot just means you like walking around barefoot. There is no hidden meaning there
quoted by bellaEvery time I see one of those posts of "Miss-Current-Big-Boobs is going to chat tonight, who's gonna ask THE QUESTION???" my colon gets it's clench on. I am one of the females on this planet who could give a rat's heinie about how Madamoiselle Big Boobie lost weight/got divorced/screwed alien twins. And asking them about intimate details of their lives is, to me, a huge neon sign that your blow up doll has more of a life than you . It's not whether they have to answer, but that my fellow ticklefolk would be tacky enough to ask-and yes, I think it's a creepy question, along with does she like being spanked and can you have some of her underwear since you're her biggest fan??