TicklingDuo
3rd Level Yellow Feather
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2001
- Messages
- 3,733
- Points
- 0
There have been many threads that have touched on this a bit. But, I haven't seen one that really concentrates on it. So....
If you are a LER...What is the attitude of your tickling? Do you want to break the person, get sexual enjoyment for yourself, give sexual enjoyment to the LEE, just play around and have fun, a combination of these, or something totally different?
If you are a LEE...What is your attitude towards being tickled? Do you enjoy it, hate it, love/hate it, find sexual enjoyment in it, find pleasure in the sexual enjoyment of the LER, enjoy the playfulness of it, enjoy taunting your LER by withholding your responses, a combination or something totally different?
The reason that I'm asking this is a conversation I had recently with a friend in the community. An observation that we've made is that many LERs only want to tickle someone if they're kicking and screaming and begging for it to stop. They seem to enjoy the aspect of it as being torture and have little interest in a LEE who makes them work at getting a reaction. This raised a few questions as I thought about the matter...the reason for the post.
For me, as a lee, I enjoy the playfulness of tickling. While it can sometimes drive me to the brink of insanity (No comments from the peanut gallery! 😛 ), I thoroughly enjoy being tickled. I also enjoy driving my ler(s) crazy by refusing to respond or by asking when they're going to start tickling. I don't do a whole lot of laughing. Instead, I tend to make lots of weird noises. When it's with Drew, I also enjoy the exchange of sexual pleasure that can go with the tickling. As a ler also, I enjoy the playfulness and gentle taunting of the person.
Often in this community, we hear talk of "breaking" someone. We spend a good deal of time teasing back and forth about it. But, why is this really important? If you're one of those for whom it's important to do so/have it done to you, I'd be interested in hearing your reasons. It seems to me that the use of a safeword has lost its emphasis as something to ensure the safety of the lee and become a target to be reached (or even passed) to prove that the ler has won. I'm not sure why that is or that it's a bad thing. Just something to think about.
Ann
If you are a LER...What is the attitude of your tickling? Do you want to break the person, get sexual enjoyment for yourself, give sexual enjoyment to the LEE, just play around and have fun, a combination of these, or something totally different?
If you are a LEE...What is your attitude towards being tickled? Do you enjoy it, hate it, love/hate it, find sexual enjoyment in it, find pleasure in the sexual enjoyment of the LER, enjoy the playfulness of it, enjoy taunting your LER by withholding your responses, a combination or something totally different?
The reason that I'm asking this is a conversation I had recently with a friend in the community. An observation that we've made is that many LERs only want to tickle someone if they're kicking and screaming and begging for it to stop. They seem to enjoy the aspect of it as being torture and have little interest in a LEE who makes them work at getting a reaction. This raised a few questions as I thought about the matter...the reason for the post.
For me, as a lee, I enjoy the playfulness of tickling. While it can sometimes drive me to the brink of insanity (No comments from the peanut gallery! 😛 ), I thoroughly enjoy being tickled. I also enjoy driving my ler(s) crazy by refusing to respond or by asking when they're going to start tickling. I don't do a whole lot of laughing. Instead, I tend to make lots of weird noises. When it's with Drew, I also enjoy the exchange of sexual pleasure that can go with the tickling. As a ler also, I enjoy the playfulness and gentle taunting of the person.
Often in this community, we hear talk of "breaking" someone. We spend a good deal of time teasing back and forth about it. But, why is this really important? If you're one of those for whom it's important to do so/have it done to you, I'd be interested in hearing your reasons. It seems to me that the use of a safeword has lost its emphasis as something to ensure the safety of the lee and become a target to be reached (or even passed) to prove that the ler has won. I'm not sure why that is or that it's a bad thing. Just something to think about.
Ann