People keep on saying that just because feet are softer, that means they are more ticklish. And when they are calloused, they are less ticklish.
I do not agree with this at all, in fact I think this is just a myth.
I've had a couple of girlfriends with extremely tough soles because they went our barefoot a lot. They could walk on rocky terrain, hot asphalt, stony ground, etc without a problem. Yet a slight tickle to their soles rendered them a ticklish mess - in fact if I recall, it was one of the most ticklish places on their bodies. On the flip side, I've also had girlfriends who probably had the softest, babyish feet you've ever seen. And not a even giggle no matter how much I tried to tickle them with what ever technique. I really think it comes down to the individual and not the thickness/roughness of skin, because everyone is different. Each individual has their own reactions to various sensations, whether it be with baby soft skin or skin as hard as a horses hoof (which ironically enough, can be sensitive too in a few spots - if you ever worked with a farrier you would know this).
Another debunk to the "calloused skin is not sensitive" myth is that the ball of my foot is pretty much a rough spot, but my arches are a lot softer. Yet I am extremely ticklish on the ball, much more so than on the arch or even in a super soft spot like under my toes.. I also find it interesting that sometimes light strokes on harder patches of skin elicit more ticklish laughter, and not hard strokes. The same goes for soft skin - sometimes I find light tickles do nothing but heavy tickles are the way to go there.
I think at the end of the day, it depends on the individual and possibly the way their nerve endings react to different kinds of stimuli because it is different on an individual basis. You're either ticklish or you're not, with rough calloused skin or smooth, unblemished skin.
Thoughts?
I do not agree with this at all, in fact I think this is just a myth.
I've had a couple of girlfriends with extremely tough soles because they went our barefoot a lot. They could walk on rocky terrain, hot asphalt, stony ground, etc without a problem. Yet a slight tickle to their soles rendered them a ticklish mess - in fact if I recall, it was one of the most ticklish places on their bodies. On the flip side, I've also had girlfriends who probably had the softest, babyish feet you've ever seen. And not a even giggle no matter how much I tried to tickle them with what ever technique. I really think it comes down to the individual and not the thickness/roughness of skin, because everyone is different. Each individual has their own reactions to various sensations, whether it be with baby soft skin or skin as hard as a horses hoof (which ironically enough, can be sensitive too in a few spots - if you ever worked with a farrier you would know this).
Another debunk to the "calloused skin is not sensitive" myth is that the ball of my foot is pretty much a rough spot, but my arches are a lot softer. Yet I am extremely ticklish on the ball, much more so than on the arch or even in a super soft spot like under my toes.. I also find it interesting that sometimes light strokes on harder patches of skin elicit more ticklish laughter, and not hard strokes. The same goes for soft skin - sometimes I find light tickles do nothing but heavy tickles are the way to go there.
I think at the end of the day, it depends on the individual and possibly the way their nerve endings react to different kinds of stimuli because it is different on an individual basis. You're either ticklish or you're not, with rough calloused skin or smooth, unblemished skin.
Thoughts?