WickedTouch
TMF Poster
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2015
- Messages
- 133
- Points
- 28
Note: This is a bit of a technical question, but accounts of real world practical experience is as welcome as engineering backed advice.
I'm interested in buying some chain to use in non-suspension bondage. Specifically, I want 316 stainless. I am fairly familiar with chain for…non-human…applications, but am having trouble knowing how small of link rod diameter I can get away with. I much prefer the asthetic and feel of 3/16" over 1/4", but is that practical with the dynamic loads put on it with a fairly strong individual? I know the static working load limits are typically around 800 and 1,400 lbs for 3/16" and 1/4" respectively, and their typical breaking load is around 4,200 and 6200 lbs.
Again, my use case is not suspension. One length of chain per cuffed limb is the intended application. It's the sudden jerking or thrashing that has me concerned about wear on the chain over time. My concern is less of a safety concern due to how I'm using it, and more of a cost concern given that stainless chain is not cheap!
I'd appreciate any constructive input. Thank you!
I'm interested in buying some chain to use in non-suspension bondage. Specifically, I want 316 stainless. I am fairly familiar with chain for…non-human…applications, but am having trouble knowing how small of link rod diameter I can get away with. I much prefer the asthetic and feel of 3/16" over 1/4", but is that practical with the dynamic loads put on it with a fairly strong individual? I know the static working load limits are typically around 800 and 1,400 lbs for 3/16" and 1/4" respectively, and their typical breaking load is around 4,200 and 6200 lbs.
Again, my use case is not suspension. One length of chain per cuffed limb is the intended application. It's the sudden jerking or thrashing that has me concerned about wear on the chain over time. My concern is less of a safety concern due to how I'm using it, and more of a cost concern given that stainless chain is not cheap!
I'd appreciate any constructive input. Thank you!