LetsGETickled
Registered User
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2012
- Messages
- 6
- Points
- 0
Okay, before I get started, let me apologize in advance for what will no doubt be ranting and raving. It's hardly the appropriate introduction, but the upside is that none of you know me or have any preconceived notions.
That said, here I go.
I just started a new job recently. It's a great job involving today's cutting edge technology. The company is great. The people are the coolest. The management is awesome. The perks are quite attractive and the salary is more than I asked for.
So today, my manager is talking to me about goals. I'm sure most of you have been through this process just as I have with every company I've ever worked for. You know the drill. You set goals for the year and at the end of that year your performance is rated according to the degree to which you met those goals.
I was totally on board with my manager as she talked about the goals I need to set. They all pertained relevantly to the job...until we reached a certain point in the conversation...
"Now one thing I want is for everybody to have at least one community goal."
"Community?"
"Yes, community. For example, Jenny volunteers to aid the homeless. Frank is involved with CAMM (Connect A Million Minds). Judy does work for breast cancer awareness"
"Okay, sure...but..."
"But what?"
"Okay, don't get me wrong. I think it's great that people are willing to give up their time for this kind of thing. But I'm having a hard time wrapping my brain around how community service pertains to employee performance."
"You don't think it's important to serve the community? To give a little back to the community that's given so much?"
"I'm not saying it is or it isn't. What I'm trying to say is that community service, however important it may be, is not relevant to an employee's job performance. I've been working for big companies for a while. They all encourage community service, and provide opportunities for it. And that's great. Because those who are inclined to participate are free to do so, and those who aren't don't have to."
"Well I think it's important for everybody to contribute something."
"But you're essentially placing a mandate for volunteer work, AND using it as a criteria for evaluating somebody's job performance. I'm sorry, but that just seems wrong and unfair. Judge me on how well I perform the job. Am I consistently on time? Do I take too many smoke breaks? Does the quality of my work meet and/or exceed your expectations? Those are the things that make a good employee, not how far I go to emulate Mother Theresa."
"Okay, fine. You don't have to do community service."
So now, I'm the only guy in the entire company (to my knowledge) who's not on board with the community service mandate.
But there was another point of contention. Somewhere, in my goals, I'm supposed to demonstrate "inclusion." In other words, document some effort on my part to reach out to other people groups. I'm thinking, "Jesus, who writes these HR policies? Doctor Fucking Phil??"
In my opinion, this community service mandate is outrageous. If I'm to volunteer for something, it's going to be of my own volition. That's what volunteering is, right? Community service mandate? Leave that in the realm of criminal penalty where it belongs, not as a criteria for evaluating employee performance.
I'm curious to know what others think of this. I welcome all honest opinions.
That said, here I go.
I just started a new job recently. It's a great job involving today's cutting edge technology. The company is great. The people are the coolest. The management is awesome. The perks are quite attractive and the salary is more than I asked for.
So today, my manager is talking to me about goals. I'm sure most of you have been through this process just as I have with every company I've ever worked for. You know the drill. You set goals for the year and at the end of that year your performance is rated according to the degree to which you met those goals.
I was totally on board with my manager as she talked about the goals I need to set. They all pertained relevantly to the job...until we reached a certain point in the conversation...
"Now one thing I want is for everybody to have at least one community goal."
"Community?"
"Yes, community. For example, Jenny volunteers to aid the homeless. Frank is involved with CAMM (Connect A Million Minds). Judy does work for breast cancer awareness"
"Okay, sure...but..."
"But what?"
"Okay, don't get me wrong. I think it's great that people are willing to give up their time for this kind of thing. But I'm having a hard time wrapping my brain around how community service pertains to employee performance."
"You don't think it's important to serve the community? To give a little back to the community that's given so much?"
"I'm not saying it is or it isn't. What I'm trying to say is that community service, however important it may be, is not relevant to an employee's job performance. I've been working for big companies for a while. They all encourage community service, and provide opportunities for it. And that's great. Because those who are inclined to participate are free to do so, and those who aren't don't have to."
"Well I think it's important for everybody to contribute something."
"But you're essentially placing a mandate for volunteer work, AND using it as a criteria for evaluating somebody's job performance. I'm sorry, but that just seems wrong and unfair. Judge me on how well I perform the job. Am I consistently on time? Do I take too many smoke breaks? Does the quality of my work meet and/or exceed your expectations? Those are the things that make a good employee, not how far I go to emulate Mother Theresa."
"Okay, fine. You don't have to do community service."
So now, I'm the only guy in the entire company (to my knowledge) who's not on board with the community service mandate.
But there was another point of contention. Somewhere, in my goals, I'm supposed to demonstrate "inclusion." In other words, document some effort on my part to reach out to other people groups. I'm thinking, "Jesus, who writes these HR policies? Doctor Fucking Phil??"
In my opinion, this community service mandate is outrageous. If I'm to volunteer for something, it's going to be of my own volition. That's what volunteering is, right? Community service mandate? Leave that in the realm of criminal penalty where it belongs, not as a criteria for evaluating employee performance.
I'm curious to know what others think of this. I welcome all honest opinions.