i have been studying the Levter trilogy for quite some time, and i can't help but think that in the silence of the lambs, although a great movie, that there was a slight misunderstanding about starlings charecter.
I think that to the outside world she should have appeared to be more the classic ambitious, confident, slightly jaded, aspiring, special agent in charge, and that the timid, submissive part of her persona should have manifested during lecters first jabbing tirade at her, when he called her a rube. That way the sado-masochistic tension between them would have been a little bit more pronounced, but they have to get an a for effort.
to all the lers out there, even though we missed the extra chromosomes to be real maniachs, isn't it nice to see that soft submissive side of our lees that the rest of the world doesn't get to see. Its so romantic.
I think that to the outside world she should have appeared to be more the classic ambitious, confident, slightly jaded, aspiring, special agent in charge, and that the timid, submissive part of her persona should have manifested during lecters first jabbing tirade at her, when he called her a rube. That way the sado-masochistic tension between them would have been a little bit more pronounced, but they have to get an a for effort.
to all the lers out there, even though we missed the extra chromosomes to be real maniachs, isn't it nice to see that soft submissive side of our lees that the rest of the world doesn't get to see. Its so romantic.