I'd say you're missing my point, there, goodieluver.
I put an emphasis on *like*, while quoting Toulou's words, because by his reasoning palm reading and sole reading could be related.
But I'm not stating that palm reading *is* science truth.
I just said that if the first were true, the second could, *likewise* be.
...
Besides, sole reading implies sole handling, and sole handling leads to tickling - as a nice scene in Bolliwood flick Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam can prove.
Your point is bursting collective bubbles, just as if somebody asked for a drawing of Santa, and you stormed in and stated "Santa doesn't exist *therefore* no picture of him can be produced. Period!".
...
Someday *I'll* start telling what I deem stupid and a fraud.
I'm sure people will welcome a free unsolicited eye-opening lecture on their flaws.
...
Not.