Fetish VS Turn on

[deadlywiffeathr]

Been thinking about what actually defines a fetish lately and it seems that the consensus is roughly this: a "fetish" for something leads to sexual pleasure from engaging in the act whilst, or leading up to a sexual encounter.
Personally I don't need tickling to be part of my sexual experiences, but it certainly turns me on if included. So it begs the question, is tickling an actual sexual fetish for you...or merely a turn on?

 

[dskodj]

Sexual fetish all the way for me. Though, it could and has been a double whammy which worked both ends.

 

[deadlywiffeathr]

I think its a mix of both for me. I certainly think about it too much for it not to be considered a fetish lol, but ultimatley its just a really big turn on.

 

[ticklishdanny]

For me it's a little different, at times it can really turn me on but it's also REALLY REALLY fun. It's more fun for me than it is a turn on

 

[ticklehound]

In the sense that (to me) a "fetish" is something tangible that is necessary for me to get off; tickling is not.

That said, tickling is definitely the ultimate turn-on!

I don't need tickling to get-it-on, but it most definitely helps

 

[voided9]

Tickling is definitely, 100% necessary for me to get off. I either have to be giving it, receiving it, watching it, or imagining it - but I can not get off without it!

 

[shiftdown]

I almost hate to say it but tickling is a requirement (turn on) but it can also be for fun, especially when doing a full body massage

 

[milagros317]

It is a turn on for me, and an erotic interest, but I wouldn't call it a fetish. 😀

 

[paracarl44]

I get turned on either way.

 

[Angel_2]

Its a turn on for me, its not sexual for me at all