Foot Fetishists Here

[theshire]

Does anyone remember the time when women had legs, torsos, arms and heads?

The reason I ask is because there is a substantial number of foot fetishists at the TMF, and to read their posts one would assume that all women consist of is a pair of feet. The amount of threads we get titled things such as, "Are your feet ticklish?" Not, "Are you ticklish?", but are your FEET ticklish. As if that is the only place that matters. The amount of of threads about FEET. The amount of times a video clip is posted with solely upper body tickling and some deranged foot-worshipper appears and screams, "Can't you make a clip of her feet being tickled??????"

There is a new thread in this forum right now entitled: "When did you first notice there were people who were very interested in your feet?" What does that have to do with tickling?

It's not that they shouldn't be allowed their fetish. I am a self-confessed upper body fan. But at no point do I insist on seeing that kind of material when a foot clip is posted. At no point do I talk about my fetish as if UB tickling is the only type that exists.

So my questions are:

1) Why do the majority of foot fetishists remain so utterly blinded by their own fetish to the extent that they essentially fail to realise the rest of the body can be ticklish, too?

2) Why do foot freaks even come here in the first place? Tickling is one aspect of foot fetishism; there are so many other things they like to do to feet. Isn't there a good foot fetish forum they can join?

I'm not criticising all foot fetishists here. Many aren't this intrusive or ignorant. Nor am I saying that they should all go away. I'm just wondering why they insist on claiming they have a tickling fetish when tickling is really only a small part of their real fetish; or even worse, mixing the two up until both fetishes become one and the same and their "tickling fetish" consists solely of tickling FEET.

 

[sabaki]

You seem angry at them, but it's just what they like. Is it inconceivable that someone might just like tickling feet? Also, seen in other contexts, tickling itself is a very narrow interest. Should I not be able to go to a bdsm club and talk about my love of tickling?

Foot fetishists have a right to be here as much as anyone. To each his (or her) own. 🙂

 

[theshire]

What I am saying is that they are FOOT fetishists, not tickling fetishists. The rest of the body is of no interest to them when it comes to tickling. It's not that they can't join this board, but I believe if feet mean more to them than tickling does they would be better served going elsewhere and ceasing to terrorise the rest of us by filling up the forum with feet, feet, feet.

 

[maniactickler]

Im a big time foot guy, but i still love full body tickling. id get bored just tickling feet alone. now if i can only find an actual woman that has ticklish feet dammit!

 

[jaba]

lets keep TMF topics on "Tickling".......

I agree with Shire on this....in part...

I have a major foot fetish, but there is no reason why I cannot pop that subject into my internet search engine and be filled to my hearts content....I see no reason that "non tickling related foot subjects" should clog up this forum, when there are much larger forums of "foot interest" that exist all over the web.....

Our tickling forum (and our tickling community, for that manner) is relatively small, and we should have a right to keep our topics tickling related, whatever part of the body suits your particular tastes.....

But if a member has a foot, underarm, upperbody, hair, tongue or eyeball tickling
topic, they should be able to discuss it here.....if the topic does not peak my interest, I just don't click on the thread...






jaba

 

[Goodieluver]

Does anyone remember the time when women had legs, torsos, arms and heads?

The reason I ask is because there is a substantial number of foot fetishists at the TMF, and to read their posts one would assume that all women consist of is a pair of feet. The amount of threads we get titled things such as, "Are your feet ticklish?" Not, "Are you ticklish?", but are your FEET ticklish. As if that is the only place that matters. The amount of of threads about FEET. The amount of times a video clip is posted with solely upper body tickling and some deranged foot-worshipper appears and screams, "Can't you make a clip of her feet being tickled??????"

There is a new thread in this forum right now entitled: "When did you first notice there were people who were very interested in your feet?" What does that have to do with tickling?

It's not that they shouldn't be allowed their fetish. I am a self-confessed upper body fan. But at no point do I insist on seeing that kind of material when a foot clip is posted. At no point do I talk about my fetish as if UB tickling is the only type that exists.

So my questions are:

1) Why do the majority of foot fetishists remain so utterly blinded by their own fetish to the extent that they essentially fail to realise the rest of the body can be ticklish, too?

2) Why do foot freaks even come here in the first place? Tickling is one aspect of foot fetishism; there are so many other things they like to do to feet. Isn't there a good foot fetish forum they can join?

I'm not criticising all foot fetishists here. Many aren't this intrusive or ignorant. Nor am I saying that they should all go away. I'm just wondering why they insist on claiming they have a tickling fetish when tickling is really only a small part of their real fetish; or even worse, mixing the two up until both fetishes become one and the same and their "tickling fetish" consists solely of tickling FEET.

You are more than welcome to start a thread saying "when have u noticed people looking at your underarms or tummy or whathaveyou"

There are people on here who are strictly underarm or tummy ticklers and there are feet ticklers and there are ticklers who like whatever is ticklish.

This reminds me of the bloody M\M debate\debacle
If u want more of something, post it then, not complain about the amount of other content

and i object to being called a foot freak, didnt know when joinin the tmf i had to be equal oppourtunity tickler. Hell, look at the main icon of the forum(shemp if u will) Its a pair of feet being tickled

 

[TicklishLurker]

Instead of complaining about the amount of foot-tickling related stuff, why not contribute what you like? No one's stopping you.

I just think feet are more interesting. Sorry. That's how I am. Feet wiggle. Squirm. Eventually get too tired. And admittedly my feet are an errongenous zone for me. If I'm not tickled on them I can't get arroused. I like being tickled all over, but I like having my feet tickled the best.

 

[FlockOfSeagulls]

I agree completely with TicklishLurker`s opening statement

Isn`t what you are criticising actually what you are practicing? You are basically saying foot fetishist are narrowminded & focus too much on one aspect. But isn`t you being a upperbody person basically the same thing in principle?

Plus you are making assumptions and lumping all '' foot people'' together.

 

[Goodieluver]

I agree completely with TicklishLurker`s opening statement

Isn`t what you are criticising actually what you are practicing? You are basically saying foot fetishist are narrowminded & focus too much on one aspect. But isn`t you being a upperbody person basically the same thing in principle?

Plus you are making assumptions and lumping all '' foot people'' together.

Agreed, i also find it to be a hypocratic moment, people i know on here would complain about the "feet fanatics" yet would post pix of their feet and other images of feet to satisfy the masses.

 

[LindyHopper]

Yeah, shire! And while we're at it, let's get rid of all the posts expounding on your reactionary political views. They have nothing to do with tickling, and they're clogging up our TICKLING forum!!!

In case you couldn't tell, I was being sarcastic. 🙄 Your political views do, in fact, seem to be of interest to plenty of people on the TMF. We also have members who enjoy humor, various topics of general interest, and... feet. 😱 So they contribute, and request, what they like. You are free to do the same.

Believe me, I'm a great proponent of tickling the entire 'lee, not just her feet. However, a foot fetish is one of the most benign fixations I can imagine, and foot fetishism is one of the biggest overlaps with the tickling fetish. I've spent some time in foot-fetish-internet-land, and from what I can see, tickling plays only a tiny part. If one has a fetish for tickling feet, this is the place to be. And we should be welcoming them, not trying to chop up our already tiny community by driving out foot fetishists, M/M fans, bondage enthusiasts, or anyone else with a specific interest related to tickling. I mean, after all that, who'd be left?

 

[theshire]

You're not getting my point. I have nothing against people having a foot fetish. Nothing at all. Nor do I have anything against those same people joining this forum. What I DO object to is the sheer narrow-mindedness of many. Those people who write about foot tickling as if it is the only kind. Those people who complain about clips which don't have any foot tickling in them. You can say they are a minority if you want, but from where I'm sitting there's still too many of them.

As I said before, at no point have I ever demanded to see UB tickling when a clip shows only feet. I move on to one I DO like instead. At no point do I think of tickling from JUST the perspective of what I happen to like. But it seems many foot fetishists are the opposite of me. Now we have threads in the tickling section of the forum asking what size your feet are. We had to create a whole sub-forum entitled "Non-Tickling Images" which was pretty much invented just so foot fans wouldn't be clogging up the forum which pictures of feet in an inappropriate section.

The point I am making is that too many people here blur the line between tickling and foot fetishism and that this is not what the forum was intended for.

 

[luvgirlsfeet]

I may be a foot guy yes but I'm VERY MUCH into tickling her feet ribs belly button etc. I have tickled many women from ages 19 to 50 and had a awesome time in doing so and on more than one occasion the same woman more than once..Personally I'm a DAMN good tickler..just ask tickleshotel she knows from experience

 

[jaba]

there is an appropriate section in the TMF for most interests....

At no point do I think of tickling from JUST the perspective of what I happen to like.

Now we have threads in the tickling section of the forum asking what size your feet are.


We had to create a whole sub-forum entitled "Non-Tickling Images" which was pretty much invented just so foot fans wouldn't be clogging up the forum which pictures of feet in an inappropriate section.

The point I am making is that too many people here blur the line between tickling and foot fetishism and that this is not what the forum was intended for.

I must confess that I do think of tickling primarily from the perspective that interests me, which is primarily foot tickling......

And if there is to be a "non tickling images" section to our forum, then I guess that particular section is appropriate for foot, ass or elbow pictures.....

But while I would personally love to know the answer to many non tickling related foot questions, inquiries regarding foot and shoe size, nail polish color, ect. are as inappropriate in the "Tickling Discussion" section as are inquiries regarding breast and nipple size......or NASCAR......



🙂 jaba 🙂

 

[reflexology414]

Hmmm...

It's a beautiful Sunday morning and I have no wish to argue with or offend anyone. I simply wanted to add my thoughts to this thread.

Anyone who has read my posts or corresponded with me knows that I'm one of those feet people the original poster referred to. However, I'd like to point out that I also greatly appreciate full body tickling, and I never fail to notice and appreciate ALL of my partners -- their feet, legs, torsos, arms, and heads.

I can honestly say that tickling is NOT a small part of my fetish. Not by any means. I've always had a passion for tickling. Granted, it goes hand in hand with my foot fetish, but not to the exclusion of full body tickling.

Even when I am engaged in foot play, it's still about the person as a whole -- the woman's physical and emotional responses to my touch, including the pleasure she gets from our encounter. The bottom line is that it's an intimate exchange involving the whole person -- not just a pair of feet.

While there are some "feet freaks" who are one-dimensional in their interests, many of us are extremely well rounded, and I believe there is room for us in this community.

 

[BigJim]

When it comes down to it, why not? Why should anyone be broad-minded in their tickling scope? What does it matter if someone's perspective of tickling is shallow? Why is it worth getting angry about it? Why should anyone give a shit?


Many people come across this way, navigating into tickling as they are by a love of the female foot. So what? Personally I came into tickling this way too, but broadened my tickling repertoire because it’s more fun and varied and less boring for the willing and very wonderful lee.

There aren’t many posts I’ve seen you make where you don’t come across as angry at the world, not because it’s personally slighting you, but because you have an angry personality and get a kick out of being professionally indignant.

 

[theshire]

Perhaps.

I don't make much of an effort to hide the way I am feeling. I could say equally that I have very rarely read a post of yours where you don't come across as self-righteous, smarmy and condescending. It's the points made that should matter.

I contend that if many foot fetishists here wish to continue visiting this forum and posting, there should be a new section devoted entirely to feet. I'm not saying all foot tickling clips/pics/stories should go in there, but I think all foot related chat or media that doesn't involve tickling should go there. It would be a bit like the "Non-Tickling Images" forum, although it wouldn't be disguised to hide what it really is: a haven for foot fetishists.

Or, failing that, they should simply talk about feet at a separate forum that has been DESIGNED for it.

Then again, it does seem that all foot fetishists are straight males. Maybe that is why they come here: because a foot fetish board would consist only of male members and they wouldn't have anyone to pester for pics of their feet.

 

[ShadowTklr]

From childhood, I started out with a fetish for FOOT tickling - nothing more, and definitely NOT a foot fetish. In fact, in early years, the idea of kissing or fondling a woman's foot was utterly appalling to me. All I wanted to do was tickle her feet.

Today, I can definitely say that I have somewhat of a foot fetish, but if tickling is not involved, then I'm only mildly interested. For those people here who do not have a tickling fetish, but rather have a non-tickling foot fetish, then I would imagine they would find this place to be lacking somewhat in desireable material.

I've noticed many requests for feet here, Shire, but I always assumed those requests were because of a prediliction for tickling FEET, in which case, it seemed perfectly germane.

 

[FlockOfSeagulls]

Perhaps.

I don't make much of an effort to hide the way I am feeling. I could say equally that I have very rarely read a post of yours where you don't come across as self-righteous, smarmy and condescending. It's the points made that should matter.

I contend that if many foot fetishists here wish to continue visiting this forum and posting, there should be a new section devoted entirely to feet. I'm not saying all foot tickling clips/pics/stories should go in there, but I think all foot related chat or media that doesn't involve tickling should go there. It would be a bit like the "Non-Tickling Images" forum, although it wouldn't be disguised to hide what it really is: a haven for foot fetishists.

Or, failing that, they should simply talk about feet at a separate forum that has been DESIGNED for it.

Then again, it does seem that all foot fetishists are straight males. Maybe that is why they come here: because a foot fetish board would consist only of male members and they wouldn't have anyone to pester for pics of their feet.

OR maybe you might be better served in your endeavors to find a forum that caters to '' upper body tickling only ''


by the way, are the ''foot fetishists narrowminded '' because they don`t share the same views & tastes as you?

 

[theshire]

OR maybe you might be better served in your endeavors to find a forum that caters to '' upper body tickling only ''

I wonder if you could point me to such a forum? No? I could certainly point you to a number of foot tickling websites. Video producers that have the word "Foot" in their name and produce material which is solely foot tickling. Why is it that foot people polarise their tastes so much from everything else? By the way, I'm not saying all foot fetishists are like this - indeed some of the responses to this thread so far would have proved me wrong if I had. But take a look at the amount of producers that specialise in foot tickling and then try to find the same number who specialise in solely belly tickling, for instance.

I already admitted I'm more of an upper body fan. But I still have an interest in foot tickling and still engage in it: just ask slap'n'ticklee. What I am saying is that a large number of foot ticklers seem to believe that is all there is to tickling. To them, that is all that matters. It's not the fetish itself that bothers me; it's the way that it's become extremely commonplace for members of this forum to act as if this place was designed for their particular kink, which is was not. As I said, I think there should be a separate section for foot fans; it would give them somewhere to focus on rather than filling every section of the board with foot stuff.

by the way, are the ''foot fetishists narrowminded '' because they don`t share the same views & tastes as you?

Absolutely not. See above. I think SOME OF THEM are narrow-minded not because they have their fetish, but because they seem to forget that this is NOT foot tickling board. It's the attitude of the people, not the fetish itself, that grinds on me.

 

[tickleshotel]

I;d like to say that while I admit to having a passion for tickling feet and having my feet tickled,that I don;t limit myself to just feet..I am a Female both a Ler,lee and If given the opportunity,I will tickle the upper body or wherever the lee has the best ticklish response or enjoys being tickled the most.

 

[Barlow]

What I am saying is that they are FOOT fetishists, not tickling fetishists. The rest of the body is of no interest to them when it comes to tickling. It's not that they can't join this board, but I believe if feet mean more to them than tickling does they would be better served going elsewhere and ceasing to terrorise the rest of us by filling up the forum with feet, feet, feet.

Well, one reason could be that in many foot fetish communities (actually all the sites I have visited) tickle fetishists are despised. There are many silly posts to quote, but probably one of the silliest was on the Mousepad about 6 years ago when someone posted that tickling a woman's feet can actually damage the feet and create wrinkles, which the author of the post despised. He was actually complaining about the wrinkles on Cory Lane's soles.

As defined by your original post, I am apparently one of the the Good Ones. I like UB tickling, too. And I have actually posted some pictures of women's underarms. Some of them I posted in the "Non-Tickling Image Forum." Some I had posted in the tickling images forum before the NTIF was created. Hopefully I am not one of the Pod Terrorists you despise.

Barlow

 

[FlockOfSeagulls]

I wonder if you could point me to such a forum? No? I could certainly point you to a number of foot tickling websites. Video producers that have the word "Foot" in their name and produce material which is solely foot tickling. Why is it that foot people polarise their tastes so much from everything else? By the way, I'm not saying all foot fetishists are like this - indeed some of the responses to this thread so far would have proved me wrong if I had. But take a look at the amount of producers that specialise in foot tickling and then try to find the same number who specialise in solely belly tickling, for instance.

I already admitted I'm more of an upper body fan. But I still have an interest in foot tickling and still engage in it: just ask slap'n'ticklee. What I am saying is that a large number of foot ticklers seem to believe that is all there is to tickling. To them, that is all that matters. It's not the fetish itself that bothers me; it's the way that it's become extremely commonplace for members of this forum to act as if this place was designed for their particular kink, which is was not. As I said, I think there should be a separate section for foot fans; it would give them somewhere to focus on rather than filling every section of the board with foot stuff.



Absolutely not. See above. I think SOME OF THEM are narrow-minded not because they have their fetish, but because they seem to forget that this is NOT foot tickling board. It's the attitude of the people, not the fetish itself, that grinds on me.

It`s not that I mind you having a beef about this issue. It is just how you respond to the matter that I take issue with.You make general assumptions about '' foot fetishists'' and then you state'' not all of them are like this. ''
Then you precede to lump everyone together anyway. In most Demographic societies the '' majority rules'' is in effect.

I think it is good that you have an opinion and are not afraid to voice it. Just let others who have a different view on the subject have the same opportunity to voice there opinions as well.

 

[theshire]

When have I ever denied others their opinions? The only way I can make my point is to generalise now and then. But I really do realise that not everyone is the same and I try to make a point of stating this.

Thanks for your views.

 

[jaba]

despite how you may feel about the messenger.....

I hope many here are not dismissing the merits of some points of Shires argument, merely due to their disdain for the messenger.....

I may or may not be one of the foot fetishists that he speaks about, and it I really could care less......his feelings about my preferences for feet doesn't interest me in the least.......

But "non tickling" talk or images, regarding ANY part of the anatomy, do NOT belong in the "Tickling Discussion" section of our forum, and in truth we foot folks may be the biggest transgressors of a policy that has been kindly requested by our TMF moderators........

Perhaps a little self adherence to TMF policy on the part of some here would resolve many of these issues....

 

[Knox The Hatter]

Well, one reason could be that in many foot fetish communities (actually all the sites I have visited) tickle fetishists are despised. There are many silly posts to quote, but probably one of the silliest was on the Mousepad about 6 years ago when someone posted that tickling a woman's feet can actually damage the feet and create wrinkles, which the author of the post despised. He was actually complaining about the wrinkles on Cory Lane's soles.

I wonder what this cretinous waste of human intellect thought of the posts concerning torture with pointed devices, and whether he voiced his own displeasure with those.

I do validate Theshire's concerns. Beating dead horses about the same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over becomes a bit boring after a while. Variety's the spice of life.

For me, and I do speak for myself, feet do rule. But the sameness of everything tends to deaden.