U.N.Owen
4th Level Red Feather
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2001
- Messages
- 1,950
- Points
- 63
*Sigh* It's sick whackos like this who give alternate sexualities a bad reputation. Why can't people control themselves?
"Foot-Licker Sentenced To A Year
Offender Violated Probation On Sexual Assault Charges
POSTED: 4:22 p.m. EDT July 26, 2002
UPDATED: 4:42 p.m. EDT July 26, 2002
PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- Convicted foot-licker Raymond Dublin will serve a year in prison for violating his probation on earlier sexual assault charges.
Dublin is the 34-year-old Providence man who followed the woman as they were shopping in Woonsocket, R.I., stores and licked their feet.
The Woonsocket Call reported that Superior Court Judge Edwin Gale gave Dublin a choice: Accept the one-year sentence for his probation violation, or fight the charge and risk a longer sentence.
Dublin pleaded no contest earlier this month to simple assault charges stemming from the three foot-licking incidents. He still faces similar foot-licking charges in Massachusetts.
Copyright 2002 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed."
(I also cannot resist adding that this should end all claims that forced tickling of a stranger would be laughed at by police, and not considered a crime. Note particularly that this "foot-licking" is specifically referred to in the article (from the Associated Press) as "simple ASSAULT" (see above, where emphasis is added). Yes, assault, without bruising, denting, or breaking. That's why it's simple assault, not aggravated assault.)
Here's the URL of the article, lest its authenticity be doubted: http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/1579554/detail.html
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce707/ce70786fc3588d15788fce258ca387a14db21820" alt="SoWrong :sowrong: :sowrong:"
"Foot-Licker Sentenced To A Year
Offender Violated Probation On Sexual Assault Charges
POSTED: 4:22 p.m. EDT July 26, 2002
UPDATED: 4:42 p.m. EDT July 26, 2002
PROVIDENCE, R.I. -- Convicted foot-licker Raymond Dublin will serve a year in prison for violating his probation on earlier sexual assault charges.
Dublin is the 34-year-old Providence man who followed the woman as they were shopping in Woonsocket, R.I., stores and licked their feet.
The Woonsocket Call reported that Superior Court Judge Edwin Gale gave Dublin a choice: Accept the one-year sentence for his probation violation, or fight the charge and risk a longer sentence.
Dublin pleaded no contest earlier this month to simple assault charges stemming from the three foot-licking incidents. He still faces similar foot-licking charges in Massachusetts.
Copyright 2002 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed."
(I also cannot resist adding that this should end all claims that forced tickling of a stranger would be laughed at by police, and not considered a crime. Note particularly that this "foot-licking" is specifically referred to in the article (from the Associated Press) as "simple ASSAULT" (see above, where emphasis is added). Yes, assault, without bruising, denting, or breaking. That's why it's simple assault, not aggravated assault.)
Here's the URL of the article, lest its authenticity be doubted: http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/1579554/detail.html