• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The TMF is sponsored by:

Clips4Sale Banner

Harry Potter films

jts963

1st Level Yellow Feather
Joined
Oct 30, 2002
Messages
3,048
Points
0
There's another HP thread but it is exclusively focussed on the books so it didn't seem appropriate for me to post there.

Anyway, since Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is coming out in the middle of this month, I felt compelled to post this trivia challenge:

That movie has already been featured on TV in a fictional show! Can anybody name the show it appeared in and when the show was first aired? I will supply the answer next weekend if nobody else has the answer.

Here's another question: what differences if any between the book(s) and the film(s) do you particularly like or dislike?
 
there are always changes that have to be made, but i think some of the worst ones are when they get rid of characters...i wish they'd put in peeves, the poltergeist. however, since i am a big fan of the books, any changes are too much!
i'm still super excited about the movies coming out
 
I need to hold a Potter-Movie-Marathon before I see this new movie. I've only read the first two books, and seen I think three of the movies(possibly out of order, at that), and all were quite awhile back. So, yeah - I need to reacquaint abit before I walk into the theater for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.
 
there are always changes that have to be made, but i think some of the worst ones are when they get rid of characters...i wish they'd put in peeves, the poltergeist. however, since i am a big fan of the books, any changes are too much!
i'm still super excited about the movies coming out

Yes, movies made from books almost always leave out or change some interesting details and disappoint the book fans. But one thing I really like about the HP films are their above-average musical scores. The producers didn't skimp on the music. :cool

I need to hold a Potter-Movie-Marathon before I see this new movie. I've only read the first two books, and seen I think three of the movies(possibly out of order, at that), and all were quite awhile back. So, yeah - I need to reacquaint abit before I walk into the theater for Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.

There are some good full synopses for the first five HP films at imdb. You can be up to speed in no time.
 
yeah...the music is good. also, richard harris (rip) was an excellent dumbledore. i like michael gambon, but i don't think does the role justice
 
'Harry Potter' countdown: A late-night call from David Yates reveals magical secrets
LA Times - 07:21 PM PT, Jun 19 2009

It was about 3:20 a.m. yesterday when my phone rang: It was David Yates, the soft-spoken British director whose second "Harry Potter" film, "Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince," arrives in theaters across America on July 15. He sounded apologetic: "It's quite early there isn't it? Thanks for doing this, mate."

Despite the hour, it was my pleasure to take the call -- Yates is one of the nicest people you'll ever meet and, after visiting him outside London last year on the set of "Half-Blood Prince," it was a treat to catch up, even if his schedule required the pre-dawn appointment. Right now, Yates is in the midst of filming the final boy-wizard adventure, "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows," which will be split into two films.

"We're here in the forest, we've just finished the scene where Harry, Hermione and Ron are captured by the Snatchers after being chased through the woods. The Snatchers are brutal and scary but they aren't the most intelligent of creatures.They're trying to figure out exactly who it is they've caught."

I told Yates about my new theory: That the single best decision made in show business over the last decade was the casting of Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson and Rupert Grint in the lead roles of Harry, Hermione and Ron. I could almost hear him smile on the other side of the Atlantic.

"Absolutely, I think you're correct. It was an extraordinary bit of judgment, bringing those three in. They have been so stable and level-headed and in working with them I continue to be impressed by how keen they are to challenge themselves and to try new things to bring out the characters that they portray. They have become these engaging ambassadors for the films and the story. They have been endlessly enthusiastic. They want to see how good they can be in these roles. They haven't had their heads turned, either, by the fame and attention or any of it, which is wonderful for everyone to see."

There's never been a film franchise that has delivered this many movies on this scale and in this sort of time. The Hollywood history books will look back on this as the Hogwarts Decade. The first "Potter" film was released in November 2001, and the eighth will close out the saga in summer of 2011. Yates says there is a sense on the set that something very special is unfolding.

"I think with each film the audience is surprised by how much [the lead actors] have grown up," he said. "I think it's unique in the history of film, really, given the popularity of the series and the way these young actors have grown up in front of us. It will be interesting in the years to come to see how they themselves look back on this experience."


"Half-Blood Prince" was supposed to be in theaters last November, but that plan changed when Warner Bros. abruptly pushed the film back. The reason? Money. The studio execs reasoned that young fans would be more likely to see the film multiple times if it was released outside the school year. And because Warner Bros. was fresh from last summer's massive success with "The Dark Knight," putting some space between the two blockbusters made good business sense. Many "Potter" fans, of course, were terribly distressed by the postponement and, it turns out, so was Yates.

"It was not something I warmed to initially. At the time, I was so adrenalized, I was so caught up in the process of getting the film in on deadline and making the movie on a certain schedule, and then the decision to delay was a huge anticlimax. There was a huge sense of disappointment, I must say. We finished the film a year ago, so it's very strange to go all this time without seeing it with an audience, which is what you make it for. But the studio made their case for the move and I came to understand and appreciate their reasons and they are very good at delivering these movies and understanding the process of making a film successful and I think it wise to defer to their judgment."

I asked Yates about the downsides of the delay for him as a filmmaker and he chuckled. "You find yourself fiddling with it much more in post-production, naturally. There's a good and bad to that. You could keep adjusting things for the rest of your life if you allowed yourself to do that. That can be unhealthy and at some point you have to say, 'Here is the cut-off date.' I know fans are eager to see it and it's been interesting for us to come back to it now, even as we are busy filming the next installments."

There are only seven "Potter" books on the J.K. Rowling shelf, of course, but the producers and Yates are breaking the final novel into a two-part film. They cite the jam-packed tale of the final book and the difficulty of whittling it down to a single film. Plenty of skeptics, of course, are saying money is the true reason for the tacked-on Warner Bros. release, but Yates was more interested in a different fiscal consideration. "I will get the benefit of two budgets, the running time of two films and all the resources that brings with it to tell this huge adventure; more time, more money, more special effects. There are always things that are lost when you adapt a book to a film. With two films, much less will be lost."

I asked Yates if he had decided on the splitting point -- the juncture at which the seventh film will stop.

"Yes, I think we have," he said. "Things can change when you edit, of course, but the idea now is that it will be not long after the sequence that we are filming here today. That's what we're experimenting with. We've had three or four different ideas about where to cut off the seventh film. Traditionally, the movies have ended with a death or a bereavement, some sort of passage or arrival. This time we think we will end with more a cliffhanger. Again, though, that's the thought as of this moment."

In the background, I could hear a voice calling Yates back to the set. The gentlemanly filmmaker apologized again. "I'm sorry I wish I could talk longer. It will be lovely to catch up when you're back here next time. We're very excited for everyone to see 'Half-Blood Prince' and talking about it only makes me more excited. Okay, get get some sleep, mate. Cheers."

-- Geoff Boucher
 
Last edited:
Karen's siblings are here for the summer, so we'll probably end up taking them to see it. It really is them who want to see it and not me. I'm just supervising. Just like I did with Transformers 2. 😛

But in all seriousness, I can't help liking the movies. They may not be as detailed as the books, but if they we're, they'd be so long and boring. Just like "Open Water" (oy, don't get me started).
 
But in all seriousness, I can't help liking the movies. They may not be as detailed as the books, but if they we're, they'd be so long and boring. Just like "Open Water" (oy, don't get me started).
I totally agree, although the fact that they didn't tell us who sent the dementors after Harry in the last movie is deficient. They imply it's Voldemort but that's crazy because Voldemort still needed Harry to find the prophecy, and death by dementor doesn't get that done.
 
OK, as promised, I will answer the trivia challenge I posed at the start of this thread. First, a restatement of the challenge:

The unreleased film Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince has already been featured in a TV fiction show. What is the name of the show and when was the show first aired?

* spoiler space

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

The TV series is Law & Order: Criminal Intent. The episode, first aired 21 November 2006, is called "Blasters" and featured Team B: Detectives Logan (Chris Noth) and Wheeler (Julianne Nicholson). The HP film was one of a number of bootleg DVDs of unreleased movies that some organized gangsters were trying to profiteer from. It was the only "bootleg DVD" that didn't have a fictional title (except for the fact that it hadn't been made yet 😛).

Some yob at imdb thinks choosing HBP as the unreleased Potter film in "Blasters" was a goof but I'm sure the script writers deliberately chose a HP film with plenty of lead time before its release in order to keep the episode "fresh" long into the reruns.

Check out my thread on Hogwarts hotties :

http://www.tickletheater.com/showthread.php?t=52623
 
I did read the books - one time each. And I have seen the movies - again, one time each. So I am not as familiar with the series as some of these experts. Still, I am looking forward to the new movie.

Over on dA there has been quite a bit of fanfiction about the Harry Potter series, including the girls getting tied up and in some stories, tickled for information. I commented on one story that instead of Defense Against the Dark Arts that they need classes on Defense Against the Tickling Arts!
 
OK, as promised, I will answer the trivia challenge I posed at the start of this thread. First, a restatement of the challenge:

The unreleased film Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince has already been featured in a TV fiction show. What is the name of the show and when was the show first aired?

* spoiler space

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

*

The TV series is Law & Order: Criminal Intent. The episode, first aired 21 November 2006, is called "Blasters" and featured Team B: Detectives Logan (Chris Noth) and Wheeler (Julianne Nicholson). The HP film was one of a number of bootleg DVDs of unreleased movies that some organized gangsters were trying to profiteer from. It was the only "bootleg DVD" that didn't have a fictional title (except for the fact that it hadn't been made yet 😛).

Some yob at imdb thinks choosing HBP as the unreleased Potter film in "Blasters" was a goof but I'm sure the script writers deliberately chose a HP film with plenty of lead time before its release in order to keep the episode "fresh" long into the reruns.

Check out my thread on Hogwarts hotties :

http://www.tickletheater.com/showthread.php?t=52623

Actually, I saw this episode and I wondered. But you do know the movie was originally set to be released last November? Entertainment Weekly had a whole cover on it, then they changed the release date. Personally, I think it was to avoid splitting their audience with The Twilight fans. I was madder than hell... but I can't wait for Tuesday/Wednesday 🙂 I'll be at the midnight screening !
 
Actually, I saw this episode and I wondered. But you do know the movie was originally set to be released last November? Entertainment Weekly had a whole cover on it, then they changed the release date. Personally, I think it was to avoid splitting their audience with The Twilight fans. I was madder than hell... but I can't wait for Tuesday/Wednesday 🙂 I'll be at the midnight screening !
They give the reason for the change in the release date in post #6 of this thread.

Enjoy the midnight screening. 🙂
 
What's New

9/24/2024
Clips4Sale is where to be for the webs largest fetish clip selection!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top