Hottie at Drive-thru becomes my Foot Friend

[tyler_d]

I first saw this hottie, Sheila Coley, working at the drive-thru window of a late night fast food restaurant. She always had such a beautiful professional voice and pretty face every time I pulled through. I wondered for many months how to find out her social media information so I could see if she would show me her feet. After much research, I lucked out and found it. Luckily, I had an angle to get to her through a friend of a friend. And after lengthy coordination, my model scout friend helped make the meet-up happen.

When I finally got to see her size 9.5 soles, they were as big and shapely as I'd hoped they would be! And as I got closer to her feet, I noticed they had an amazing scent! I wanted to lick'em and smell'em right then and there but I did not want to freak her out on the first shoot, so I waited for the 2nd shoot to let my dreams come true.

One thing she knew how to do was clamp her toes tight over my nose, forcing me to inhale nothing but her sweet scent. It was heaven and she also never had her feet licked before prior to me, so seeing her surprised face was a bonus!

Over time, we ended hanging out alot and going eating, drinking, smoking, bar-hopping, and gambling quite a bit... not necessarily dating persay, but as adventurous party pals.

 

[robmic]

I'm happy for your luck, but since when did this become "The Foot Worship Forum"? I thought that there was "Tickling" somewhere in the name?

 

[hammertyme]

Beautiful feet, but I’ve got to agree with robmic.

 

[milagros317]

Great photos! Thanks for sharing them here. 😀

I'm happy for your luck, but since when did this become "The Foot Worship Forum"? I thought that there was "Tickling" somewhere in the name?

Beautiful feet, but I’ve got to agree with robmic.

I believe that the Non-Tickling Image Forum exists for exactly this purpose--posting photos that do not involve tickling.

 

[hammertyme]

This is true milagros, but most of the people that post here will at least tell you whether or not that person is ticklish. John jo posts a lot of pics with no tickling, but he darn sure let’s you know that they are. After all, that’s the common interest here. They gotta know that the question will be asked, so why omit that little tidbit of information.

 

[tyler_d]

so why omit that little tidbit of information.

She was slightly ticklish at times (from initial tongue contact), but always got her composure back to enjoyed it instead.

 

[robmic]

This is true milagros, but most of the people that post here will at least tell you whether or not that person is ticklish. John jo posts a lot of pics with no tickling, but he darn sure let’s you know that they are. After all, that’s the common interest here. They gotta know that the question will be asked, so why omit that little tidbit of information.

I post pictures of nice feet on here that aren't being tickled but I would love to tickle. But this original post and some other's I've seen here are blatantly foot worship and not really indicative of tickling. Would be nice if these people had a separate place to post the stuff they like so those of us who don't consider it what we'd do in the first place could pass it over. Not saying there's anything wrong with it if that's what you like, but I come here for the tickling!

 

[tyler_d]

...but I come here for the tickling!

Interesting that you come to a sub-forum named "Non-Tickling Image Forum" for the tickling.

...Would be nice if these people had a separate place to post the stuff they like

Agreed, those a-holes should probably post their stuff to the "Non-Tickling Image Forum".

...But this original post and some other's I've seen here are blatantly foot worship and not really indicative of tickling.

You've obviously never tickled a woman by using your tongue and it shows. I, however, have done it many times. Maybe try opening your perspective a bit and see how the world might surprise you, or just quit whining for a change.

Case in point, see attached. Foot worship can totally equate to ticklishness, but I would post these pics in a "tickling" section of the forum, not a "non-tickling" section where they don't belong.

There's plenty of other blatant non-tickling stuff in this non-tickling forum, as you've admitted to posting yourself. Why draw a line in the sand and attack only foot worship as opposed to soles, or candids, or foot modeling that can also be "blatantly non-indicative" of tickling? Maybe it's your personal bias that gets in the way?

And this original post isn't even strictly foot worship as you call it. The 2nd posted pic showcases soles presented in such a way that most of us would love to tickle. How were you not seeing that?