From what I've read, a guesstimation perhaps, reported known tickling is b/w 4-5000 years old. Which leads to a couple of interesting questions...
(1) Maybe we are so interested in tickling, partly, is b/c it is a relatively new phenomenon in the history of mankind. Perhaps so new, in fact, that we are still in the inital stages wherein peeps respond to being tickled by laughing and spasmodic movement.
Perhaps in another couple of thousand years, there will new responses to tickling seen in humans, or perhaps tickling will even fall of the map as a viable sensation (say it ain't so!);
(2) Is a major response to tickling due to the fact that most of us were tickled during childhood? Some more than others, I know.
What I mean to say, is that do any of you know ticklish peeps today who were never tickled as children? And, more importantly, are their ticklish responses as pronounced as someone who was tickled during childhood?
Phew...now where did I leave that dissertation?
Cheers.
(1) Maybe we are so interested in tickling, partly, is b/c it is a relatively new phenomenon in the history of mankind. Perhaps so new, in fact, that we are still in the inital stages wherein peeps respond to being tickled by laughing and spasmodic movement.
Perhaps in another couple of thousand years, there will new responses to tickling seen in humans, or perhaps tickling will even fall of the map as a viable sensation (say it ain't so!);
(2) Is a major response to tickling due to the fact that most of us were tickled during childhood? Some more than others, I know.
What I mean to say, is that do any of you know ticklish peeps today who were never tickled as children? And, more importantly, are their ticklish responses as pronounced as someone who was tickled during childhood?
Phew...now where did I leave that dissertation?
Cheers.
Last edited: