Re: Krokus
Neutron said:
I'm wondering if skittlesBoy is willing to provide concrete proof to the rest of us who are potentially affected that he is in fact of legal age.
Tron
Tron....Myriads has just informed us of the fact that he spent a good deal of time looking into this and that
proof was provided. Do we or do we not trust our mods to be sure things go as they should??? If he has seen proof that skittles is of age, I say we let this drop. We're once again wasting time on stuff that creates controversy and distracts us from our purpose here.
Before someone says that we need to protect ourselves from underage users, I totally agree. I don't want underage people here either. I agree that the question should be raised when there's a possibility of someone being here who shouldn't be. It's something that shoud be brought to the attention of the mods (preferably off the forums, IMHO). But, skittles being a highschool junior does not automaticly make him underage. There are many reasons, illness and learning difficulties among them, that could have led to this situation. Proof has been provided. End of discussion.
As for the topic of this post....
While I think that a tickling issue would be cool....with BOTH guys and gals as victims...I doubt that we'll ever see SI put one out. However, it's something that COULD be done by people here. Who knows, skittles? Maybe some day.
Ann
PS - In all honesty, in my limitted contact with skittles, I've found him to be very mature for his age...much more so than many older members I've encountered.