In case Jeff didn't know yet . .

[devilscabanaboy]

Jeff,
Just thought I'd give you a heads up that the preview clip link for your new vid isn't working. Not sure what the problem is, but I think it might have to do with the link - it tries to go to the audio page.

Anyhow, for everyone else, go check out the new vid from MTP - Angelica's First Time. It sounds like it's going to be a great film.

DCB

 

[Longbaugh]

Yeah, when I tried to save target as it just saves an html document.
Cool pictures though.

 

[Sandman]

Works fine for me. I just wish the clip had SOME armpit tickling. Had leg, feet, tummy/ribs but no armpit.🙁 I was a little dissapointed in that but can't be that picky. I just will get the vid and hopefully that has some.

 

[devilscabanaboy]

It's working just fine now. So everyone - run over and get it while supplies last! It looks like a damn fine video.

DCB

 

[TICKLERBOY123]

an excellent video clip - AND MIGHT I ADD THAT REALTICKLING COULD LEARN A THING OR TWO FROM THIS CLIP!!!! the video clip suggests that this will be a fine video! One question though - in the opening scene of the clip we see Angelica laying faced down on a couch getting her feet tickled. This is precisely what i want in a tickling video and i was just wondering for exactly how long does this particular scene last?????
GOOD WORK JEFF!

 

[Sandman]

?

Realtickling has awesome clips. What is wrong with there clips?

 

[dvnc]

I dug the preview, which worked just fine for me. Heck, I dug the description. Hadda see what so delighted him to describe it so well. Lookin' forward to it, too.

Like Sandman, I'm wonderin' what's worth knockin' Real Tickling? They do a different kind of video than Magic Touch, and have a different kind of preview. Clearly, it's working for some of us. What exactly was the problem, here? If you're going to critique their clips, it would be better for our little community here if you provided some detail as to what didn't work for you, and what you want to see, y'know? Otherwise, it just sounds like the short end of a rant, which never gets well received.

For those with download problems, do try again, as save the .rm file as source (meaning that it's not saved as text or html). This is especially useful if you downloaded the little .ram file and let Real's software handle the rest. All it takes is a bit of network stymie to mess up or prevent playback. The .rm downloads the whole clip. While difficult for some of the modem-based folks, it'll give you a big preview file.

More change donated,

dvnc

 

[dodger]

Post deleted by Myriads.

It was a direct flame on another forum member.

Not tolerated. Strike one.

Myriads

 

[Sandman]

Let's not start a flame war here. Let the guy explain what he meant when he said RT can learn a thing or two before we start to insult him. And Im not talking about you dvnc.

 

[dvnc]

I didn't figure y'were, Sandman. Ain't yer style, anyway.

From my perspective, Dodger, TicklerBoy123 is doin' as the vendors expect - downloading video clips. Do ya know if he bought any? Do ya know if he has any dough t'buy any? What about a house free of roomies in which to WATCH one? I know a bunch of folks through my events that don't have dough or the luxury to view. We'll sometimes preview videos, which I don't enjoy, since I'd rather talk to the folks there, but I don't dis the folks watchin' 'em, 'cause most don't have the opportunity at home.

TicklerBoy123 may be grousin' without explanation, which I don't dig, but give the man a chance to respond, and some respect for the fact that he posts. How's he gonna post better if he don't post wrong once, y'know? I bet next time, he'll bust out wit' somethin' concise and clear, somethin' that the vendors can USE. Information on how a video's received ALWAYS helps 'em, if it's clear, objective and well worded. Ask Jeff. He's a pal o' mine, and I still bit at him a bit in a review of an early release of his, 'cause he'd still some improvements he could do (and who doesn't?). The video still rocked, but it could have been better, and he agreed. Still beat a lot of what was available, and since, the man's work has only improved.

A body can contribute, and help. Constructive criticism helps. Bad-mouthin' someone don't help. It's AMT all over again. We're not doin' that here. That's still out there for anyone wantin' t'talk smack about someone else. Not here, tbough. Here, someone like me will point out where it ain't cool t'do, and someone wiser, like the boss man, will excise the thread if it continues.

Contribute, brother. It's a clever smack y'laid out, so clearly, y'ain't dull. Just avoid smackin' at folks when you can ask for clarification. If he DIDN'T clarify, well, then he's dissed hisself, hasn't he? I don't have to smack at anything, then. Neither d'you.

Cool? Hope so. It's the way, here.

another $0.02,

dvnc

 

[ktickler]

In another place

Hi,

You will be able to find detailed information about what TICKLERBOY123 meant regarding the RT video clip in the Video Clips forum. The post is the one that Kathy started with their most recent clip and she asked for feedback. I believe it is about 3 pages long now with information about why people did or did not like it.

Peace,

Knight Tickler

 

[TMF Jeff]

Hi guys,

Thanks for the feedback, I got the problem fixed as soon as I noticed it.

Jeff

 

[dvnc]

Knighttickler, thanks for the clarification, and for standin' up for Ticklerboy123. Been seein' so much more grousin' than before that I nearly forgot how cool most everyone here can be. Mighty fine o' ya.

Ticklerboy123, givin' us old guys pointers to the original source is a good way t'keep our feeble minds focused, brother. 😉 Glad there was reason proper for such. I'm over my misconception, man!

dvnc