Aug 15, 8:44 am ET
TORONTO (Reuters) - A Canadian judge who once ejected a female lawyer for showing too much cleavage hit the headlines again on Wednesday after she ordered an accused shoplifter out of the courtroom for wearing a belly-button revealing top.
Ontario Justice Micheline Rawlins told the teenager to go and change and scolded the youth's lawyer for his client's appearance, the Chatham Daily News said.
"Frankly, your honor, I didn't notice," lawyer David Jacklin replied, before leaving to "check to make sure my other clients are appropriately dressed."
Newspapers quoted Rawlins as saying that since the teenager did not have to stare at the judge's midriff, the court should not have to eye hers either.
The teen returned to the courtroom clad in a buttoned-down shirt and was thanked by the judge. Rawlins noted that, while the tank top was inappropriate for the courtroom, it had looked nice on the girl.
In March, Rawlins refused to hear arguments from lawyer Laura Joy because she wore a tight V-necked shirt under a pantsuit. The judge deemed the outfit too revealing for a courtroom and told her to return dressed more conservatively.
"I don't want to see bra straps. I don't want to see cleavage. I don't want to see belly buttons. I don't want to see stocking tops...in a court of law," Rawlins, a judge in Chatham, Ontario, 290 km (180 miles) southwest of Toronto, said at the time.
She added that Joy's outfit "in a static position was fine, but unfortunately people move, people bend over. They don't have to look at my cleavage. I don't have to look at theirs."
----
what is this world coming to when a woman can't bare her midriff! lol
Oh the humanity! I'd take this to the Supreme Court of Canada (if there is one,eh?)
~ toyou
TORONTO (Reuters) - A Canadian judge who once ejected a female lawyer for showing too much cleavage hit the headlines again on Wednesday after she ordered an accused shoplifter out of the courtroom for wearing a belly-button revealing top.
Ontario Justice Micheline Rawlins told the teenager to go and change and scolded the youth's lawyer for his client's appearance, the Chatham Daily News said.
"Frankly, your honor, I didn't notice," lawyer David Jacklin replied, before leaving to "check to make sure my other clients are appropriately dressed."
Newspapers quoted Rawlins as saying that since the teenager did not have to stare at the judge's midriff, the court should not have to eye hers either.
The teen returned to the courtroom clad in a buttoned-down shirt and was thanked by the judge. Rawlins noted that, while the tank top was inappropriate for the courtroom, it had looked nice on the girl.
In March, Rawlins refused to hear arguments from lawyer Laura Joy because she wore a tight V-necked shirt under a pantsuit. The judge deemed the outfit too revealing for a courtroom and told her to return dressed more conservatively.
"I don't want to see bra straps. I don't want to see cleavage. I don't want to see belly buttons. I don't want to see stocking tops...in a court of law," Rawlins, a judge in Chatham, Ontario, 290 km (180 miles) southwest of Toronto, said at the time.
She added that Joy's outfit "in a static position was fine, but unfortunately people move, people bend over. They don't have to look at my cleavage. I don't have to look at theirs."
----
what is this world coming to when a woman can't bare her midriff! lol
Oh the humanity! I'd take this to the Supreme Court of Canada (if there is one,eh?)
~ toyou