• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

New Ninja Turtles

Ticklegirl1

TMF Expert
Joined
Nov 19, 2003
Messages
507
Points
0
It maybe be unimportant but the new Ninja Turtles seemed to be like the 80 series.

There maybe a chance we will get the tickler villain Don Turtelli on his tickling tricks.

Hopefully April will get a tickle treatment.
 
Whats the problem with that and yes she is 15. But lets hope foot tickling in the new series and cute ones for the girls.
 
Whats the problem with that and yes she is 15. But lets hope foot tickling in the new series and cute ones for the girls.

A fifteen year old girl getting kidnapped, tied up, and tickled isn't porn hun. It's pedophilia. Nickelodeon really screwed up with this one. It isn't even a cartoon. The entire show is a C.G.I. animation. Bummer.
 
A fifteen year old girl getting kidnapped, tied up, and tickled isn't porn hun. It's pedophilia. Nickelodeon really screwed up with this one. It isn't even a cartoon. The entire show is a C.G.I. animation. Bummer.

Ugh, CGI.. I'm not a fan of it, it looks really ugly in my opinion when they use that cartoonish look to it. Apparently though, it's actually really in spirit similar to the 80's series.
 
If you ask me, In a non-tickling term, even though I'm a little interesting about this new TMNT stuff, but I doubt any of kinds can top the classic one that was aired in around 1980s.

I don't know what C.G.I. stands for, but I don't think I wanna find out.
 
Well now nobody said he'd be kidnapping april, he could do his tickling tricks on other older females
 
A fifteen year old girl getting kidnapped, tied up, and tickled isn't porn hun. It's pedophilia.

Not even close. Seriously, why do we always get this "She's not 18!!! And she's being tickled!!! This is the work of pedophiles!!!!! They must burn in Hell!!!!" shit whenever this stuff comes up. It's emberassing.

That being said, from the sounds of things just said on this thread, i'm hesitant. I'll be honest. I've seen and read a little about the last animated adaption of TMNT's and to be honest, it was pretty impressive. That being said, i'm not a big fan of CGI shows and a 15 year old April O'Neal seems way off the mark.
 
Yup...which really doesn't make it animation any more imo. On the April topic they should have stuck with the news reporter character. It just loses something with me now, not staying true to characters. But...thats creator rights. I guess they figure teenagers would relate better to a character closer to their age rather then a news reporter who by rights would probably be close to what...50 or so?

They did the same thing with that new Transformers Prime show. Got rid of the spike character and brought in two young kids to compensate. In my case I'm old school so neither show will hold much interest for me...but I'm sure both will do well.
 
Most everything is now animated on computers at some stage of development.
 
Not staying true to the character? I take it that you don't know that "true" to April O'Neil means making her a living drawing created by her "father" who helped Baxter Stockman until she found out he was robbing banks. The reason for the drastic age change this time around was that the powers that be decided that it'd be easier to have her believably interacting with teenage turtles if she herself were a teenager.

Also, the animation is pretty damn slick. The movement is really well done, and the action's fun so far. And that's only the first episode, so it's bound to improve over time.

Plus the Kraangs! There's a whole species of brains in robots now!
 
I think it's stupid how you say it's not animation because it's done on computers. Animation doesn't mean drawing it by hand and then putting it together. It's still animation on computer. Sorry, step in to the 21st century please and get real.

Secondly, I watched the first episode and there were certain things I didn't like. At least what I thought was happening... the one thing is.. I don't know about the turtles.. but Splinter was a real person instead of a rat that got transformed into Splinter after his owner died... he was the person that got in the fight with Shredder and then got the ooze on him and it turned him into a giant rat. I don't know that I liked that.

I also don't like that April is some little kid, however what Violetta said makes sense. It does make kinda more sense that some little kid would make friends with the TMNT instead of some older news reporter.

And about the tickling. Just because you might think it's similar to the old TMNT, doesn't mean there's going to be tickling. Don't be all like, "There might be tickling OMG! There might be tickling." Yadda yadda. That just sounds stupid, in my opinion. For one thing, as someone said April is a young girl this time so it's a little bit different. Also, even though it might be in the "spirit" of the 1980s show, I don't think it's written by the same people. Therefore it probably won't happen. They're making it similar to the show but they're not going to go back to show and put in that sort of stuff that they had in that show... They're just making it seem like it used to be. They're not going to be like "Oh, there was tickling... let's add that in..."

I'm sorry, that whole thing probably sounded rude... I didn't mean for it to come off that way. Just showing my views.
 
Secondly, I watched the first episode and there were certain things I didn't like. At least what I thought was happening... the one thing is.. I don't know about the turtles.. but Splinter was a real person instead of a rat that got transformed into Splinter after his owner died... he was the person that got in the fight with Shredder and then got the ooze on him and it turned him into a giant rat. I don't know that I liked that.

Yeah, that's Splinter's origin from the 80s show, too. I actually prefer that to the comic book's origin. And for that matter, I prefer the 80s show to the comic overall. Too grimdark Frank Miller for my taste.
 
I think it's stupid how you say it's not animation because it's done on computers. Animation doesn't mean drawing it by hand and then putting it together. It's still animation on computer. Sorry, step in to the 21st century please and get real.

I prefer hand drawn animation thank you very much. If stepping into the 21st century means giving up what I like then I'll decline thank you very much.

I also don't like that April is some little kid, however what Violetta said makes sense. It does make kinda more sense that some little kid would make friends with the TMNT instead of some older news reporter.

(shrugs) Someone of us 80's children loved classic yellow jumpsuit fluffy short red haired Channel 6 reporter April O'Neil (mostly for the sex appeal but hey who DOESN'T LIKE sex appeal)? A 15 year old girl has no sex appeal however and to be perfectly blunt it seems like their trying to make the show less and less adult oriented and more and more kiddy oriented (like the AWESOME Justice League [and Justice League Unlimited] cartoons compared to the absolutely shitty Teen Titans cartoon).

Then again, this is Nickelodeon and they haven't been known to produce that much ADULT-BASED material. I'm not saying this cartoon is doing things right. Far from it. A bad ass HUMAN shredder (god I HATED they made Shredder a Utrom in the 2000 series) and as Violetta said an army of cyborg body manipulating Krangs is nice. Still, it could be even more badass with classic elements from the 80's cartoon (specifically damsel in distress ADULT April O'Neil).
 
I prefer hand drawn animation thank you very much. If stepping into the 21st century means giving up what I like then I'll decline thank you very much.



(shrugs) Someone of us 80's children loved classic yellow jumpsuit fluffy short red haired Channel 6 reporter April O'Neil (mostly for the sex appeal but hey who DOESN'T LIKE sex appeal)? A 15 year old girl has no sex appeal however and to be perfectly blunt it seems like their trying to make the show less and less adult oriented and more and more kiddy oriented (like the AWESOME Justice League [and Justice League Unlimited] cartoons compared to the absolutely shitty Teen Titans cartoon).

Then again, this is Nickelodeon and they haven't been known to produce that much ADULT-BASED material. I'm not saying this cartoon is doing things right. Far from it. A bad ass HUMAN shredder (god I HATED they made Shredder a Utrom in the 2000 series) and as Violetta said an army of cyborg body manipulating Krangs is nice. Still, it could be even more badass with classic elements from the 80's cartoon (specifically damsel in distress ADULT April O'Neil).

My point was, not what people like or don't like. My point was that it's still animation. Not liking that kind of animation doesn't make it not animation. So people saying that it's not is stupid. Because it is.

And yes, this is Nickelodeon. So of course she'll probably be some kind. I didn't say that I preferred her as a kid. I preferred her as an adult too... I just said i understand why they might have made her a kid.
 
(rolls eyes at MTTickleMonster's post) Could let a topic die without getting the last word eh?
 
Yeah, that's Splinter's origin from the 80s show, too. I actually prefer that to the comic book's origin. And for that matter, I prefer the 80s show to the comic overall. Too grimdark Frank Miller for my taste.

Not only did they change Splinter's origins but they took two different characters, 'Yamoto Yoshi' and 'Splinter the pet rat' and combined him into one character.
 
Not only did they change Splinter's origins but they took two different characters, 'Yamoto Yoshi' and 'Splinter the pet rat' and combined him into one character.

I'm pretty sure that's basically what I said. I didn't say that they combined the characters but I said that Splinter was the one that got in the fight with the guy and then became a rat, so basically saying the same thing.

(rolls eyes at MTTickleMonster's post) Could let a topic die without getting the last word eh?

And I don't think my point about it still be animation was received so I felt the need to say something else.
 
Well, the new show looks like It can go both ways as of now.

It can turn out good or bad.

That being said, let's leave the tickling of girls to legal tender, as in 20 and up.

That, and well. He was only and the 80's for a good reason, lets leave him there.
 
Well, the new show looks like It can go both ways as of now.

It can turn out good or bad.

That being said, let's leave the tickling of girls to legal tender, as in 20 and up.

That, and well. He was only and the 80's for a good reason, lets leave him there.

Legal is 18 and up 😛
 
Plus there's there's the hilarity that "legal tender" means cash money. So "leave the tickling of girls to money." We're making sense now! Can we get some rule 34 of money in now?
 
Not only did they change Splinter's origins but they took two different characters, 'Yamoto Yoshi' and 'Splinter the pet rat' and combined him into one character.

Yamato Yoshi was Splinters' name before he got mutated by the same stuff that made the Turtles humanoid. They ARE the same guy.

~K
 
Yamato Yoshi was Splinters' name before he got mutated by the same stuff that made the Turtles humanoid. They ARE the same guy.

~K

In the original comic Hamato Yoshi was a ninja of the Foot Clan who owned Splinter. Yoshi killed Oroku Nagi, brother of Oroku Saki (Shredder) because Nagi severely assaulted his girlfriend, and Yoshi was exiled to the US because of it. In New York Saki caught up with Yoshi and his girlfriend and killed them both. Splinter was released in the resulting scuffle and everything else is history.
 
What's New

11/11/2024
Make a Wish!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top