• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year.
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Possible Tickle Meet

Status
Not open for further replies.

Super777

Banned
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Messages
33
Points
0
Hey,

I've been seriously considering a "Tickle Gathering". But it's gonna be slightly different in a way. Instead of eveyone just gathering, tickling, and chatting it up, there will be 1-on-1 tickle sessions. Any two people can get together and tickle each other 1-on-1. Or they can go to a "Tickle Specialist", who will tickle them. Each "Tickle Specialist" has only one area he tickles(he/she can tickle other areas, but at least 95% must be their specified area). Also the specilaist may choose his tickle spot. There can be more than one specialist to any area(for example: there can be any amount of feet ticklers). This is still in its beginning phases and I'll need to try this a few times. The first thing I need to do is try oone of the 1-on-1 sessions. I'll need a female volunteer to help me with the 1-on-1 preview. There is only one thing I ask of the female volunteer: that she is very, very tummy ticklish. Why? Well I'm one of the "Tickle Specialists" My specialiazed area: tummy. If any tummy ticklish females would like to volunteer for this 1-on-1 tickle session, please post in this thread or pm me. Or you can e-mail me if you like at:

jt***@sbcglobal.net

And the quicker I get my female volunteer, the quicker I can get the gathering ready and set the date and location for it. Ok, I'm out for now, later

- Super777
 
Yeah, why I didn't put this where either of you two said.....

Yeah. I've tried that before, and it was a flop. Noone even viewed it. Sooooo I put it here because I know most people view this more than others.
 
Super777 said:
Yeah. I've tried that before, and it was a flop. Noone even viewed it. Sooooo I put it here because I know most people view this more than others.

Probably because this isn't a real gathering, it's just someone trying to find a girl to tickle. Real gatherings aren't dictated like you described in the original post.
 
Wtf!?!?!

BrightEyes1082 said:
Probably because this isn't a real gathering, it's just someone trying to find a girl to tickle. Real gatherings aren't dictated like you described in the original post.

You know what, I've had ENOUGH personal attacks on me today. I don't need another smart mouth coming at me. And IF this was an attempt to just get a girl to tickle, I think I probably would've just SAID that I wanted to meet and girl and that I wanted to tickle her. But I didn't say that did I? NO. I have plenty of things go bad in my past, and this is something that I was trying to make sure would work. So the next time, before you go and run your mouth, THINK first, THEN type.
 
Super777 said:
You know what, I've had ENOUGH personal attacks on me today. I don't need another smart mouth coming at me. And IF this was an attempt to just get a girl to tickle, I think I probably would've just SAID that I wanted to meet and girl and that I wanted to tickle her. But I didn't say that did I? NO. I have plenty of things go bad in my past, and this is something that I was trying to make sure would work. So the next time, before you go and run your mouth, THINK first, THEN type.

Whatever......... I do think before I speak. But thanks. What you just said made no sense. You want to make sure it would work to tickle a girl one-on-one before having, say, 20 groups of one-on-one in one setting? Okay....... good luck with that!
 
Actually, this ISN'T a gathering. While you may not like how BrightEyes1082 phrased it, that is true.

If it WAS a gathering, I'd be moving it to an appropriate area. Right now, it's an interesting idea, with the need for a one-on-one with you and a female.

Hence, where you are for penpals may be appropriate, providing you seek only email or postal contact. If you're looking to meet someone, Personals WOULD be the appropriate spot.

An observation for you - hostile responses in a thread don't tend to read well for most folks on this or any other forum. You may wish to remove your post before more see it and simply stay away.
 
dvnc said:
Actually, this ISN'T a gathering. While you may not like how BrightEyes1082 phrased it, that is true.

If it WAS a gathering, I'd be moving it to an appropriate area. Right now, it's an interesting idea, with the need for a one-on-one with you and a female.

Hence, where you are for penpals may be appropriate, providing you seek only email or postal contact. If you're looking to meet someone, Personals WOULD be the appropriate spot.

An observation for you - hostile responses in a thread don't tend to read well for most folks on this or any other forum. You may wish to remove your post before more see it and simply stay away.

First off, I DIDN'T MOVE THE THREAD HERE. As a matter of fact I have no idea why it's here in the first place. Secondly, dvnc, let me ask you something: is BrightEyes me? Answer: NO! So why is it that BrightEyes seems to know what I was doing? I was the one who thought it up, as far as it goes, you nor BrightEyes can say what my intention was, OK!? My intention was to prepare for a gathering, REGARDLESS of your thoughts IT WAS A GATHERING. And, dvnc, let me ask you something else: why are you giving me advice on hostile posts when it seems to me that BrightEyes seemed to have posted in this thread contradicting my idea, saying I was not planning a gathering, and that goes right back to stage one: who posted this thread in the first place!? It appears to me that all in all this whole thing was started over someone letting their mouth run alittle too wild. So before you tell me advice, check to see who ACTUALLY started this.

And heres some advice for you, dvnc: You don't live my life, got it? You don't know what kind of shit I put up with everyday and I certainly don't need someone coming on here and telling ME what I was planning, ok?
 
With these few posts you have pretty much soiled your screenname's reputation for all eternity. You should register a new screenname before you try to set up another gathering.

But seriously, there's probably not a person here who doesn't have to deal with a lot of shit in their day-to-day life. Don't take it out on others. Tickling... fun... laugh. Smile. 🙂
 
Super777 said:
First off, I DIDN'T MOVE THE THREAD HERE. As a matter of fact I have no idea why it's here in the first place. Secondly, dvnc, let me ask you something: is BrightEyes me? Answer: NO! So why is it that BrightEyes seems to know what I was doing? I was the one who thought it up, as far as it goes, you nor BrightEyes can say what my intention was, OK!? My intention was to prepare for a gathering, REGARDLESS of your thoughts IT WAS A GATHERING. And, dvnc, let me ask you something else: why are you giving me advice on hostile posts when it seems to me that BrightEyes seemed to have posted in this thread contradicting my idea, saying I was not planning a gathering, and that goes right back to stage one: who posted this thread in the first place!? It appears to me that all in all this whole thing was started over someone letting their mouth run alittle too wild. So before you tell me advice, check to see who ACTUALLY started this.

And heres some advice for you, dvnc: You don't live my life, got it? You don't know what kind of shit I put up with everyday and I certainly don't need someone coming on here and telling ME what I was planning, ok?

Ladies, he's available :xpulcy:
 
Heh. I don't think I could ever do to you what you've done to yourself in this thread. You appear very angry. I don't know many who would play, especially in bondage-related activities, with an angry man, even when they start out smiling.

I actually know a bit about gatherings. The term for these combination play-party (a BDSM term) social meets is actually mine. You can find reference originally on USENET over a decade ago. No matter, though. I can't help you.

I can tell you that the current gatherings going on, coast to coast and nation to nation, DO already have one-on-one play, privately done. There's also public play, and some folks don't play or watch others play. Some just socialize.

IF this were a gathering, it should be in the gatherings forum, in your particular part of the country. Again, you would ask a moderator, like me, to move it.

In the mean time, as others have indicated, you've done yourself a disservice. I really wish that wasn't the case, as it won't help anyone. Good luck to you.
 
I'm New But....

dvnc said:
An observation for you - hostile responses in a thread don't tend to read well for most folks on this or any other forum. You may wish to remove your post before more see it and simply stay away.

I'm a new member to this forum, and on my first day I'm not out to start any fights or choose sides in this thread, but I do have to make a complaint about this thread.

dvnc, in this thread the quote i have above is my complaint. i understand that most members, myself included, dont enjoy seeing hostile posts. and most would even shy away from threads containing them, i almost did, but i had to say something. i really want to be apart of TMF, BUT i see one problem i just cant overlook here. and if you dvnc, as a moderator are going to act like that, then im not sure about remaining a member. look, it appears to me that all in all Super777 is in the right. i mean he made a point, you guys arent him, only he knows what his intention was. AND dvnc, you really didn't act like a very upstanding moderator, by saying he should watch his hostile posts, from what i saw both YOU and BrightEyes were telling him what YOU two thought his intentions were. and in your second post dvnc, you said he was an angry man, how do you know? do you know him personally? it appears not. so please, for my sake and for the sake of any new members, dont act like that, its very discouraging to us.

see as of right now i personally feel that if i share my opinion in this forum and you would disagree with what i was i was saying, YOU could tell me what i ment, or at least what you thought i ment. in conclusion, if im gonna be a member, then i must know that my rights to freedom of speech actually exist in here, cuz right now it appears that they dont. thank you.
 
Hi new member! Welcome to the TMF. If this is your first time, go and make an intro thread, and tell us about yourself. 🙂

I would just like to point out that Super777's use of all-cap speech, interrobangs, agitated rhetoric, and cursing, all support dvnc's claim that Super does "appear very angry". Sure we don't know anything about him, but we can offer opinions freely.

As for the meaning of this thread, go and look at the long list of other threads Super has started, and see if you notice a pattern. Do you really think this is about starting a gathering? Are his posts in this thread consistent with that notion? Was it posted in the right section?

Just as you can freely share your opinions, we can freely share our opinions about what we think you mean. There are really rather few limits here, which is a great part about the TMF. Enjoy your stay.
 
ShaggyMan said:
I'm a new member to this forum, and on my first day I'm not out to start any fights or choose sides in this thread, but I do have to make a complaint about this thread.

dvnc, in this thread the quote i have above is my complaint. i understand that most members, myself included, dont enjoy seeing hostile posts. and most would even shy away from threads containing them, i almost did, but i had to say something. i really want to be apart of TMF, BUT i see one problem i just cant overlook here. and if you dvnc, as a moderator are going to act like that, then im not sure about remaining a member. look, it appears to me that all in all Super777 is in the right. i mean he made a point, you guys arent him, only he knows what his intention was. AND dvnc, you really didn't act like a very upstanding moderator, by saying he should watch his hostile posts, from what i saw both YOU and BrightEyes were telling him what YOU two thought his intentions were. and in your second post dvnc, you said he was an angry man, how do you know? do you know him personally? it appears not. so please, for my sake and for the sake of any new members, dont act like that, its very discouraging to us.

see as of right now i personally feel that if i share my opinion in this forum and you would disagree with what i was i was saying, YOU could tell me what i ment, or at least what you thought i ment. in conclusion, if im gonna be a member, then i must know that my rights to freedom of speech actually exist in here, cuz right now it appears that they dont. thank you.

So if a guy was walking around your neighborhood wearing a ski mask holding a crowbar and a sack, would you believe him when he said he was just out for a stroll? I mean if he didn't do the crime yet, how could YOU know what his intentions were.
 
Wolv420 said:
So if a guy was walking around your neighborhood wearing a ski mask holding a crowbar and a sack, would you believe him when he said he was just out for a stroll? I mean if he didn't do the crime yet, how could YOU know what his intentions were.

I don't. That was my point. If Super said it was a gathering, none of us have any justifiable evidence that he's lying, regardless of what his other posts may be. Now if had actually carried out one of those other posts, then I can see reason as to why some might assume this wasn't a gathering. But from what I could see, none of his other posts were ever carried out.

And about stating your opinions freely. That's perfectly fine. But I do not agree with stating your opinion that shows you saying that the poster wasn't out for what he said he was, but for something else. Why? Because of one simple, easy-to-understand fact: You Are Not The Original Poster! Got it? Good.
 
To sabaki

sabaki said:
But seriously, there's probably not a person here who doesn't have to deal with a lot of shit in their day-to-day life. Don't take it out on others.

Ok sabaki, I have a few things I'd like to point out about these quotes. First, this one, above. I agree, we all deal with shit everyday. BUT..... BrightEyes had no real right to come in a blatantly say what she did. So technically BrightEyes, triggered this mess. So the whole "Don't take it out on others." should be redirected to BrightEyes.

sabaki said:
Just as you can freely share your opinions, we can freely share our opinions about what we think you mean. There are really rather few limits here, which is a great part about the TMF. Enjoy your stay.

Next the quote above this. All I have to say is "No." If I'm to enjoy my stay, then there's one thing I will not stand for. I don't mind if you state an opinion about me, but I will not stand for an opinion that is about what you think I meant. The only one that knows what I meant was me, and that seemed to be something Super tried to point out.

As this thread grows, I'm starting to wonder about the integrity of the staff of TMF, and I can tell you, I was not expecting this for my first opinion of TMF. Apologizes need to be said to Super for the arrogant disregard and disbelief of his intentions, before I return to a better opinion of TMF. I apologize for this post, but this is what I truely feel right now.
 
*grabs ShaggyMan's cheeks and starts pulling*

Why... *pull* ... won't this mask... *pull* ... come off?! 😀

What am I implying? ... Why, nothing, and you have no way of knowing what I am implying.
 
sabaki said:
*grabs ShaggyMan's cheeks and starts pulling*

Why... *pull* ... won't this mask... *pull* ... come off?! 😀

What am I implying? ... Why, nothing, and you have no way of knowing what I am implying.

Are you trying to make a mockery of me?
 
Okay... I really didn't want to get involved in this again... but...

Shaggy, one thing you've got to realize here is that everybody here is going to think what they want to think (about everything). There's really nothing you can do about that. I (along with others) formed an opinion about his intentions. The main thesis of his post was to find a girl to tickle one-on-one, and then to have a group of people who could only mainly tickle one spot on one person (etc, etc). That is not a gathering. Call it whatever you want, but it really isn't a gathering. DVNC defined gathering for you earlier in the thread. I formed an opinion about his intentions, and they are what they are. I'm sorry if you don't like them. I'm not saying that to be rude or sarcastic, just telling you the truth.



ShaggyMan said:
Ok sabaki, I have a few things I'd like to point out about these quotes. First, this one, above. I agree, we all deal with shit everyday. BUT..... BrightEyes had no real right to come in a blatantly say what she did. So technically BrightEyes, triggered this mess. So the whole "Don't take it out on others." should be redirected to BrightEyes.



Next the quote above this. All I have to say is "No." If I'm to enjoy my stay, then there's one thing I will not stand for. I don't mind if you state an opinion about me, but I will not stand for an opinion that is about what you think I meant. The only one that knows what I meant was me, and that seemed to be something Super tried to point out.

As this thread grows, I'm starting to wonder about the integrity of the staff of TMF, and I can tell you, I was not expecting this for my first opinion of TMF. Apologizes need to be said to Super for the arrogant disregard and disbelief of his intentions, before I return to a better opinion of TMF. I apologize for this post, but this is what I truely feel right now.
 
BrightEyes1082 said:
Okay... I really didn't want to get involved in this again... but...

Shaggy, one thing you've got to realize here is that everybody here is going to think what they want to think (about everything). There's really nothing you can do about that. I (along with others) formed an opinion about his intentions. The main thesis of his post was to find a girl to tickle one-on-one, and then to have a group of people who could only mainly tickle one spot on one person (etc, etc). That is not a gathering. Call it whatever you want, but it really isn't a gathering. DVNC defined gathering for you earlier in the thread. I formed an opinion about his intentions, and they are what they are. I'm sorry if you don't like them. I'm not saying that to be rude or sarcastic, just telling you the truth.

It's understandable, but to me coming out and saying what you seem to actually know(or think in this case) what Super meant is arrogant to me. If you guys had said he's out to look for 1-on-1 then fine. But did you? No. You attacked his intentions. And to me, it looks as if you are trying to be a "know-it-all" and I personally hate "know-it-alls". All I'm saying is had you attacked him and not his intentions, then maybe this would have gone easier, at least if I had been Super things wouldn't have gone this far.
 
ShaggyMan said:
It's understandable, but to me coming out and saying what you seem to actually know(or think in this case) what Super meant is arrogant to me. If you guys had said he's out to look for 1-on-1 then fine. But did you? No. You attacked his intentions. And to me, it looks as if you are trying to be a "know-it-all" and I personally hate "know-it-alls". All I'm saying is had you attacked him and not his intentions, then maybe this would have gone easier, at least if I had been Super things wouldn't have gone this far.

Should I get really upset now because you called me a know-it-all? According to what you've said so far, you have no right to assume anything about me or say anything about my intentions, etc. 🙂
 
Unethical Comment

dvnc said:
Actually, this ISN'T a gathering. While you may not like how BrightEyes1082 phrased it, that is true.

I can also see that dvnc is a moderator. well I've been apart of many forums and this is by far the most unethical, uncalled for, arrogant statement a moderator has ever said. If this had been posted on another forum, then dvnc would no longer be a moderator and would be permanantly banned from that forum. To me, even as a reader, I'm personally offended that this quote was made by a moderator.
 
BrightEyes1082 said:
Should I get really upset now because you called me a know-it-all? According to what you've said so far, you have no right to assume anything about me or say anything about my intentions, etc. 🙂

Brighteyes, did I say ANYTHING about you intentions? Nope. I said something about you. And if you read my old posts, I said it's ok to form opinions about others, which I did, and not about their intentions, and I didn't do that.
 
ShaggyMan said:
Brighteyes, did I say ANYTHING about you intentions? Nope. I said something about you. And if you read my old posts, I said it's ok to form opinions about others, which I did, and not about their intentions, and I didn't do that.

I have no idea where you came up with that... why is it okay to form opinions about people, but not their intentions?

Even so, please don't take this the wrong way, but you don't dictate around here what we can and can't form opinions on. I'm really not trying to be a "know-it-all," this is just the way it is. You might want to read some other threads around here to get a feel for the way things operate.

I can empathize with you in a way... people say stuff on here all the time that I don't agree with, and it drives me nuts, but all I can do is say what I think (or say nothing at all). I can't stop the others from thinking or saying what they want.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
What's New

1/30/2025
Visit Clips4Sale for the webs largest one-stop fetish clip location!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top