-
If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread -
The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us. -
>>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
Don't forget to include your username
cletus-factor
TMF Expert
- Joined
- May 20, 2002
- Messages
- 318
- Points
- 0
I'm not to partial to girls that look like 40, but I'm 22.
Also why do people even bother with pictures of just feet?
I mean I have a tremendous foot fetish, but who's to say that the pictures of just feet aren't connected to a fat ass chick?
Also why do people even bother with pictures of just feet?
I mean I have a tremendous foot fetish, but who's to say that the pictures of just feet aren't connected to a fat ass chick?
cletus said:
which ones were 40...?? unless you're...like...12 or something...then a woman in her mid 20's to 30 probably would look older to you...so I have to ask, are you really 22, or did you just add 10 years to your actual age to register here? ...and your other comment...I gotta say was totally bogus and inappropriate...!!
I'll let the lady's of the forum deal with you...LOL...!!
more nice pic's from Alf...fanx dude...!!!
Last edited:
Celtic_Emperor
3rd Level White Feather
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2002
- Messages
- 9,620
- Points
- 0
He has a valid point though Storm_Cat. Appearances can be very misleading, especially when you are wanting to look at youthful or beautiful girls when in fact you may be looking at disgusting slobs or old folks or something. It doesn't help the fantasy for those that have one, at any rate.
I suppose now my comments are worse than his?
I think what he is asking or hoping for is material where the face and/or body is featured. I personally feel the same way he does about this. I wouldn't want to be admiring feet that belonged to a repulsive looking person. I am not so consumed by my fetish (which isn't even a fair label for me since I don't need it for sexual gratification) that I only want to see the feet. In most cases, its important anyways to see the face of the ticklee and/or their body. The rest of them helps support the picture and makes it more enjoyable to view. And in my personal case, I often use pictures as reference material for my artwork. It is therefore necessary for me to see their entire body or at least their face so I can better adapt what I see into improving my art in different ways.
I will agree with you however that it was somewhat inappropriate of him (and now of me to a degree) to have said what he did, though he has a legitimate reason to not like whatever it is he has a problem with, especially if its about being decieved by the persons in a picture.
In any light, he brings up a good point. If you think thats inappropriate, the same could be said and shouldbe said for your avatar of Scooby Doo banging Daphne from behind. Thats bestiality, and thats sickening my friend, cartoon or not. So please don't be hypocritical about this.
I suppose now my comments are worse than his?
I think what he is asking or hoping for is material where the face and/or body is featured. I personally feel the same way he does about this. I wouldn't want to be admiring feet that belonged to a repulsive looking person. I am not so consumed by my fetish (which isn't even a fair label for me since I don't need it for sexual gratification) that I only want to see the feet. In most cases, its important anyways to see the face of the ticklee and/or their body. The rest of them helps support the picture and makes it more enjoyable to view. And in my personal case, I often use pictures as reference material for my artwork. It is therefore necessary for me to see their entire body or at least their face so I can better adapt what I see into improving my art in different ways.
I will agree with you however that it was somewhat inappropriate of him (and now of me to a degree) to have said what he did, though he has a legitimate reason to not like whatever it is he has a problem with, especially if its about being decieved by the persons in a picture.
In any light, he brings up a good point. If you think thats inappropriate, the same could be said and shouldbe said for your avatar of Scooby Doo banging Daphne from behind. Thats bestiality, and thats sickening my friend, cartoon or not. So please don't be hypocritical about this.
Last edited:
Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,807
- Points
- 48
... What about adding "amen", DJ? 😉
Cletus, I don't quite get your comment.
Unless I missed something in your post, you claim some of them looked older than you are comfortable with.
Which ones? Except for the first two pics, the other women all showed their faces - and pretty much everything else.
I can agree about the "feet only" gripe. As it seems some foot pics turned out to be MALE feet, or belong to very very mature women.
But I might reply to your question with a question: does it matter to question other's fetish? 😀
That is the question! 😀 😀 😀
Reg's!
Cletus, I don't quite get your comment.
Unless I missed something in your post, you claim some of them looked older than you are comfortable with.
Which ones? Except for the first two pics, the other women all showed their faces - and pretty much everything else.
I can agree about the "feet only" gripe. As it seems some foot pics turned out to be MALE feet, or belong to very very mature women.
But I might reply to your question with a question: does it matter to question other's fetish? 😀
That is the question! 😀 😀 😀
Reg's!
Last edited:
Celtic_Emperor
3rd Level White Feather
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2002
- Messages
- 9,620
- Points
- 0
Since he's not here to answer it, I'll answer it with an answer of my own-
Perhaps he was quick to say what he did. I agree that in this particular case there was no reason to believe what he was saying. Although, what he said could be applied and should be applied in a general sense.
The only reason this is really an issue is because its possible for people to decieve others with pictures. They could be showing you a picture of themselves and thats not really them. It could be some fat chick or even a dude! LOL
They have no right to lie to you or to decieve you via misleading pictures. And this can be perpetrated by the model themself or the company or third party they worked for. Things like this can also be used for scamming people. You think you're getting one thing and you're getting another.
As far as your question to his question, he admits to having a foot fetish, and chances are he feels no different about it than anyone else with a similar fetish. I'm supposing he only made that comment and meant it to be a comment in general. Perhaps he could have found a better way and time to say that, but its just as well and serves his unemphasized point that pictures can be misleading.
People are so quick to fawn over a foot, without caring who it belongs to or what they might concievably look like. If I was going to fantasize about feet after or during the viewing of a foot picture, I'd want to know what they looked like so I don't risk the chance of later finding out that I was fawning over a dude or some ugly chick. That would be a horrible feeling, would be completely embarassing to post about it beforehand, and its just wrong of the people in question to mislead you.
I'm not saying that if you have attractive feet but are not attractive yourself or are less than pleasing to the eye that you shouldn't share your pictures, I'm saying that you should have the decentcy enough to let people know what you look like first. That way, if they want to shut out you're appearance when they fantasize or whatever they can without having to feel dirty about fawning over an uncertainty that might prove to be their folly and shame later on.
( And AMEN, Kalamos, amen! The Celtic Lord strikes again! LOL ^___^)
Perhaps he was quick to say what he did. I agree that in this particular case there was no reason to believe what he was saying. Although, what he said could be applied and should be applied in a general sense.
The only reason this is really an issue is because its possible for people to decieve others with pictures. They could be showing you a picture of themselves and thats not really them. It could be some fat chick or even a dude! LOL
They have no right to lie to you or to decieve you via misleading pictures. And this can be perpetrated by the model themself or the company or third party they worked for. Things like this can also be used for scamming people. You think you're getting one thing and you're getting another.
As far as your question to his question, he admits to having a foot fetish, and chances are he feels no different about it than anyone else with a similar fetish. I'm supposing he only made that comment and meant it to be a comment in general. Perhaps he could have found a better way and time to say that, but its just as well and serves his unemphasized point that pictures can be misleading.
People are so quick to fawn over a foot, without caring who it belongs to or what they might concievably look like. If I was going to fantasize about feet after or during the viewing of a foot picture, I'd want to know what they looked like so I don't risk the chance of later finding out that I was fawning over a dude or some ugly chick. That would be a horrible feeling, would be completely embarassing to post about it beforehand, and its just wrong of the people in question to mislead you.
I'm not saying that if you have attractive feet but are not attractive yourself or are less than pleasing to the eye that you shouldn't share your pictures, I'm saying that you should have the decentcy enough to let people know what you look like first. That way, if they want to shut out you're appearance when they fantasize or whatever they can without having to feel dirty about fawning over an uncertainty that might prove to be their folly and shame later on.
( And AMEN, Kalamos, amen! The Celtic Lord strikes again! LOL ^___^)
Last edited:
Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,807
- Points
- 48
Well, let me say that, DJ: you are quite unforgiving - esp. towards yourself! 😀 😀 😀
Fawning over a feminine dude is possible. With pics you never know, and this is doubly true with amateur pics - where faces are seldom shown.
Still, since it is all a matter of self... [let's choose a neutral word] well, self gratification, fantasy should come first. As they say, it's that special something that makes your boat float what really matters.
Now, I know what you mean: I'm quite choosy myself. Just, I'm not very vocal on this matter.
But when I see an ugly foot, or a dubious ped... well, I get as sick as most discerning guys get.
It's not "just same stuff" to me. Just as it is not for you or Cletus. 🙂
Sure, since I have - what's the word? Laidback? Well, a more relaxed attitude, I don't feel as "dirty over a folly". 😀
If a pic worked once, that's good. If it laters turns out it was something else, I'll just throw it away - or move it under a different folder. 🙂
In some rare cases, it's maybe better to left questions unanswered, for the sake of fantasy and pleasure. 😉
Reg's!
Fawning over a feminine dude is possible. With pics you never know, and this is doubly true with amateur pics - where faces are seldom shown.
Still, since it is all a matter of self... [let's choose a neutral word] well, self gratification, fantasy should come first. As they say, it's that special something that makes your boat float what really matters.
Now, I know what you mean: I'm quite choosy myself. Just, I'm not very vocal on this matter.
But when I see an ugly foot, or a dubious ped... well, I get as sick as most discerning guys get.
It's not "just same stuff" to me. Just as it is not for you or Cletus. 🙂
Sure, since I have - what's the word? Laidback? Well, a more relaxed attitude, I don't feel as "dirty over a folly". 😀
If a pic worked once, that's good. If it laters turns out it was something else, I'll just throw it away - or move it under a different folder. 🙂
In some rare cases, it's maybe better to left questions unanswered, for the sake of fantasy and pleasure. 😉
Reg's!
Celtic_Emperor
3rd Level White Feather
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2002
- Messages
- 9,620
- Points
- 0
First, this doesn't have anything to do with me. I was just using an example of something that could happen, not that it has or will.
I believe you are changing this issue to something else. The issue is about deceit and its possibility in any given circumstance. While most of the time its fine as we see the models, you can't help but wonder who exactly you are looking at. It would be pretty foolish to rattle on about how beautiful a foot is and how much you want to tickle it only to find out its a man or some ugly woman. I myself am not a superficial or vain person, but when looking at these pictures, its all about being pleased. Thats what it is for everyone. You either like what you see or you don't, and based on that you may or may not comment on it.
So far I haven't encountered a problem, but like Cletus pointed out, you never know. I'd rather watch with caution than just indulge in something that might not be true. It would truly be an injustice for someone to lie about their appearance, especially in this medium where looks are very important.
I believe you are changing this issue to something else. The issue is about deceit and its possibility in any given circumstance. While most of the time its fine as we see the models, you can't help but wonder who exactly you are looking at. It would be pretty foolish to rattle on about how beautiful a foot is and how much you want to tickle it only to find out its a man or some ugly woman. I myself am not a superficial or vain person, but when looking at these pictures, its all about being pleased. Thats what it is for everyone. You either like what you see or you don't, and based on that you may or may not comment on it.
So far I haven't encountered a problem, but like Cletus pointed out, you never know. I'd rather watch with caution than just indulge in something that might not be true. It would truly be an injustice for someone to lie about their appearance, especially in this medium where looks are very important.
after reading all your replies to my comment, I went back and reviewed the pics that Alf posted again...and I really have to say that there is absolutely nothing there to warrant a valid reason to argue with you, so I'm not going to waste my time, except to say....kick back, relax, ...enjoy what peep's do take the time to post here for other's enjoyment, ...stop wingin' and whinin', ...if it's not your cup of tea, well then move on to something else that is or might be, ...and if ya can't do that, then, just, ...basically...SHUT UP...!! If ya can't think of sumpin' good to say...don't say anything at all...!! I didn't come to this forum on my own...I was invited..!! I'm not looking for a fight, but I won't back down from one..!!
a quote to possibly back me up, from Kalamos...who is someone I really don't know, but still have respect for based on his (in my opinion) unbiased posts:
"Unless I missed something in your post, you claim some of them looked older than you are comfortable with.
Which ones? Except for the first two pics, the other women all showed their faces - and pretty much everything else."
a quote to possibly back me up, from Kalamos...who is someone I really don't know, but still have respect for based on his (in my opinion) unbiased posts:
"Unless I missed something in your post, you claim some of them looked older than you are comfortable with.
Which ones? Except for the first two pics, the other women all showed their faces - and pretty much everything else."
...and as far as my Avatar is concerned...
quoting Celtic Emporer:
"If you think thats inappropriate, the same could be said and shouldbe said for your avatar of Scooby Doo banging Daphne from behind. Thats bestiality, and thats sickening my friend, cartoon or not. So please don't be hypocritical about this."
My response:
I had posted that avatar before...and removed it before. I removed it because I felt it might be in-appropriate myself....but then got favorable comments from some of the females on the board (which I did not ask for or start a poll for), in which THEY thought it was funny, etc., and THEY wondered why I took it down. So based on THEIR comments, I put it back up. It was not meant as a slight, but as humour, to which those with an open mind fully understand...!! It has absolutely nothing to do with beastiality...my friend...!! I am no hypocrite...!!
quoting Celtic Emporer:
"If you think thats inappropriate, the same could be said and shouldbe said for your avatar of Scooby Doo banging Daphne from behind. Thats bestiality, and thats sickening my friend, cartoon or not. So please don't be hypocritical about this."
My response:
I had posted that avatar before...and removed it before. I removed it because I felt it might be in-appropriate myself....but then got favorable comments from some of the females on the board (which I did not ask for or start a poll for), in which THEY thought it was funny, etc., and THEY wondered why I took it down. So based on THEIR comments, I put it back up. It was not meant as a slight, but as humour, to which those with an open mind fully understand...!! It has absolutely nothing to do with beastiality...my friend...!! I am no hypocrite...!!
Celtic_Emperor
3rd Level White Feather
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2002
- Messages
- 9,620
- Points
- 0
My issue isn't with any one person, and I myself have no problem with the pictures. I was just capitalizing on something said, as it is a truth. You're the one thats getting all huffy and puffy and defensive. My beef isn't with you, in fact, there is no beef.
Although, the one thing that caught my attention about what you said was that he was being innappropriate. He was just voicing his opinion about pictures. Its not like the pictures' feelings are going to be hurt. They are inanimate. 😛
The fact of the matter was, if you would have left what he said alone and had either ignored it or didn't comment on it and respected his right to say as he wishes when it wasn't completely offensive to begin with and was more of a concern on his part, we wouldn't be talking right now, now would we?
EDIT: Sorry, the dog is still having sex with the human female. Thats bestiality, no two ways about it. It doesn't matter how you meant it, it doesn't change the picture. Thats a pretty lame excuse. You're a hypocrite in that you call what he said inappropriate, yet you have that picture publically displayed. Its inappropriate in nature regardless of how you or anyone else feels about it, and that is what makes you a hypocrite.
Although, the one thing that caught my attention about what you said was that he was being innappropriate. He was just voicing his opinion about pictures. Its not like the pictures' feelings are going to be hurt. They are inanimate. 😛
The fact of the matter was, if you would have left what he said alone and had either ignored it or didn't comment on it and respected his right to say as he wishes when it wasn't completely offensive to begin with and was more of a concern on his part, we wouldn't be talking right now, now would we?
EDIT: Sorry, the dog is still having sex with the human female. Thats bestiality, no two ways about it. It doesn't matter how you meant it, it doesn't change the picture. Thats a pretty lame excuse. You're a hypocrite in that you call what he said inappropriate, yet you have that picture publically displayed. Its inappropriate in nature regardless of how you or anyone else feels about it, and that is what makes you a hypocrite.
Last edited:
alf1
4th Level Orange Feather
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2003
- Messages
- 2,916
- Points
- 0
Hey people there !!
I did not thought that those pix could made so many comments 🙂.
I have just some things to say : first it depends on someones fantasy - if the feet are really cute ( and do not belong to a man or a 90 yo person LOL ) i post them. Of curse i prefer way much when the girl face is depicted with her feet too. Yeah but what about a girl with pretty feet and her face is so so......err or worse pretty as hell face but not perfect feet ?
I try to post pix as clean as possible - after u people decide to like it or not.
That said i'll post some new soon
Sees !!
I did not thought that those pix could made so many comments 🙂.
I have just some things to say : first it depends on someones fantasy - if the feet are really cute ( and do not belong to a man or a 90 yo person LOL ) i post them. Of curse i prefer way much when the girl face is depicted with her feet too. Yeah but what about a girl with pretty feet and her face is so so......err or worse pretty as hell face but not perfect feet ?
I try to post pix as clean as possible - after u people decide to like it or not.
That said i'll post some new soon
Sees !!
Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,807
- Points
- 48
Tnx for posting, Alf.
Ppl don't usually agree on a given subject, but I'm sure they'll be bound to like at least some of the pics you share with us. 🙂
So, tnx again and keep posting. Even if they are - reputedly - staged, my personal preference goes for Armiranta girls. That's my own bias towards european girls! 😀 😀 😀
About Storm's avatar I'd like to say one thing: while someone could considere it "repulsive", I find it humourous.
It doesnt' depict random bestiality: it depicts Scooby Doo - which is a cartoon not a real dog - doing something absurd and really politically incorrect.
That's where the pic gets funny, 'cause it is Scooby Doo, not any generic animal: it startles and goes against expectation of what a cartoon usually does, and thence stems the humourous situation.
But, again, we are bound to be liked by only 50% of the ppl we meet. So, let's just accept it, and cherish the positive responses. 😀
Reg's.
Ppl don't usually agree on a given subject, but I'm sure they'll be bound to like at least some of the pics you share with us. 🙂
So, tnx again and keep posting. Even if they are - reputedly - staged, my personal preference goes for Armiranta girls. That's my own bias towards european girls! 😀 😀 😀
About Storm's avatar I'd like to say one thing: while someone could considere it "repulsive", I find it humourous.
It doesnt' depict random bestiality: it depicts Scooby Doo - which is a cartoon not a real dog - doing something absurd and really politically incorrect.
That's where the pic gets funny, 'cause it is Scooby Doo, not any generic animal: it startles and goes against expectation of what a cartoon usually does, and thence stems the humourous situation.
But, again, we are bound to be liked by only 50% of the ppl we meet. So, let's just accept it, and cherish the positive responses. 😀
Reg's.
alf1
4th Level Orange Feather
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2003
- Messages
- 2,916
- Points
- 0
Kalamos said:
Yes Kalamos the avatar is humourous indeed......but it seems it offends some people here.....if it was really offending i think it would not be accepted though.
About the girls from Amiranta media : wow and wooooohooooo !! they are absolutely incredible. I had some of their tickling clips and they are really cool. Those are Polish girls by the way 🙂 🙂
And i am happy that you appreciate my posts as i appreciate yours 😀
Sees !!
Last edited:
Kalamos
Level of Lemon Feather
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2003
- Messages
- 12,807
- Points
- 48
I'm not sure about Storm's avatar: if I recall well, its first version was animated as well.
It was a bit shocking, but funny, in a "warped" way. 🙂
But, hey, Storm has been quite kind in removing it the first time - just because he felt it wouldn't be liked.
So I hope nobody will have probs with it.
...
About Armiranta, yes, I DO like it. I'm european, and let me say I like european girls. Most Polish girls happen to be quite nice: they have a familiar look, yet they are fairer than most italian girls. And I like them. 🙂
My first "encounter" with Polish girls was with Ickawon's site [hope I recall his name well], and I've always liked them ever since.
So, yes, please keep up posting!
[If you happen to have that series with the gun over the girl's soles... well... 😉 I wouldn't turn it down. 😀 ]
Reg's and tnx!
It was a bit shocking, but funny, in a "warped" way. 🙂
But, hey, Storm has been quite kind in removing it the first time - just because he felt it wouldn't be liked.
So I hope nobody will have probs with it.
...
About Armiranta, yes, I DO like it. I'm european, and let me say I like european girls. Most Polish girls happen to be quite nice: they have a familiar look, yet they are fairer than most italian girls. And I like them. 🙂
My first "encounter" with Polish girls was with Ickawon's site [hope I recall his name well], and I've always liked them ever since.
So, yes, please keep up posting!
[If you happen to have that series with the gun over the girl's soles... well... 😉 I wouldn't turn it down. 😀 ]
Reg's and tnx!
Last edited:
Alf...I LOVE your posts, and generally speaking, I don't have a prob with Amiranta's site...!! Their pic's are very high quality, and the Polish girl's are very beautiful, with very nice, well groomed... erm ... 'appendages'...!! I'm just not into the pain aspect of BDSM...I would never take a flame to a woman, whether it be her foot or any other part of her body. I'd rather her feel pleasure any day of the week...24/7...!! I know some are into that, so to them I just say, whatever blows your dress up...!!
My avatar:
Until one of the Mod's contacts me and asks me to remove it...it stay's...!! I wish I HAD the animated version of it that Kalamos spoke of...!!
My avatar:
Until one of the Mod's contacts me and asks me to remove it...it stay's...!! I wish I HAD the animated version of it that Kalamos spoke of...!!
cosquillero1
4th Level Yellow Feather
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2002
- Messages
- 3,846
- Points
- 0
I enjoyed very much your selection as always alf. Thanks you for sharing !! 😉 :happy::happy::happy::happy::happy:.
