• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year.
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Provocative children's clothing

Biggles of 266

1st Level Red Feather
Joined
Apr 26, 2001
Messages
1,126
Points
36
Federal Minister for Children Larry Anthony today called on parents to boycott padded bras, low-cut tops and other provocative clothes aimed at what are being dubbed "tweens" - girls between the ages of eight and 12.

He said the racy clothing - being marketed by Target under the brand owned by US teen stars Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen - would bring unwarranted attention to young girls, and children should enjoy being kids rather than trying to dress and act older than they are.

NSW Women's Minister Sandra Nori raised the problem last week, saying warped messages on body image were being sent to pre-teen girls through the retailing of sexually inappropriate clothing.

The mary-kateandashley brand products were singled out by Ms Nori as products offering six-year-olds the same clothing as 16-year-olds.

Chain-stores were marketing padded bras to children as young as eight, Ms Nori said.

Mr Anthony said it was the responsibility of parents not to allow their girls buy or wear the clothes.

"The first thing we need to do is let kids be kids," he said.

"Before you know it they'll be grown up and they'll be at Schoolies Week.

"The last thing we need to do is to try and see our children wear provocative clothes which may bring unwarranted attention.

"You're a kid only once, you're an adult a long time.

"Let kids be kids and I think parents should say enough is enough and don't buy the products."

Mr Anthony, the father of an eight-year-old girl, said with television, magazines and video games there was already enough pressure on children and families.

He said it was not prudent for young girls to be seen in provocative clothing.

"They should be kids and they'll face the adventures of life later on but not at this stage," he said.






What do you think? Would you let your little girl wear something low cut? Is this just crazy over-protective parents, or are children dressed like this targets for predators?

Biggles
 
No,

I agree with the article. Kids shouldn't be allowed to make those decisions until they are old enough to make decisions. If a kid is too young to be given responsibilities and make correct choices... they are too young. And to me, wanting to wear that type of clothing is an incorrect choice or a irresponsible action, therefore making the child ineligible to wear them!!! HA
 
This is something that's been on my mind for awhile now. I have two little girls and the current wave of provocative clothing/merchandise makes my skin crawl. It's fine for teens but for a 7 yr old it's ridiculous.

I will always agree that it's the parents' responsibility rather than the merchants', but I also feel that it's getting out of hand (they have THONGS for 8-12 yr olds. THONGS.) I'm glad something is being said, and I'm reallllly hoping it's a trend and that by the time my 5yr old and 18 month old are in that market the pendulum will have swung back again.

Bella
 
Kids should be kids, not sluts

Some of this clothing make these 8 year olds look like "sluts" its disgusting. I just want to go to the parents and go "Stop the freakin' crack!"

On the really low cut belly jeans, I mean REALLY low... Mrs. Gerafalo was on Late Night with Connan O'Brian and made a comment on them since they were very prominent on the last MTV Music Awards show.

"...why don't they just save time and show everyone their vagina? Oh, can I say everyone on national television?"

Then I see kids who aren't even 12 wearing stuff like that and it just creeps me out knowing some child molester is getting off on that and making them a more tempting target.

There is a lot of NICE clothing for kids that doesn't make them look like they should be part of the meat market.

When they are growing up and butting heads with you and peer pressure and wanting to put on make up, stay out past 9pm and wear a cut off T, then you can worry again. Kids don't need to be obsessed with appearances and such at a young age. Eating disorders are now effecting kids under 11 and that's very disturbing.

Next we'll see some 8 year old boys with their pants near around their ankles and its not because they're running to the potty!
 
It's not just the 8 yr olds...

But it is with the 4-5 year olds also. My youngest son goes to 4yr old kindergarten and I have seen several of the 4 yr old girls there wearing stuff like this. It is terrible how these kids dress now a days and every year it hits younger and younger children. To me, it seems like some of the parent's don't care if their daughters belly button shows or if anyone can see their underwear because the hip-huggers are so low. It is more than shameful!:sowrong: Makes me happy that I don't have girls, but even with boys, you still have a big responsibility to teach them that girls are not a piece of meat.
 
Here's the weird thing, though: in the '70's we wore outfits that were kinda similar, especially in the summertime, but it was such a different time and attitude that it didn't matter. I had the same little triangle tops that tied behind your neck and at the small of my back (in hideous colors of course) but they didn't say "hottie" or "girlfriend" on the front. If anything there was a picture of Holly Hobbie (remember that one, ladies?😛 ). And everybody's bellybutton showed,we were little kids. Heck, I had a shiny gold bikini from Atlantic City when I was 5, in fact the rear end turned silver from sitting on the fire hydrant-I went all over the neighborhood in that thing and no one cared-there was an innocence that's been lost, somehow... :sowrong: :wow:

Bella
 
It is Sad!

ForgottenTcklr said:
No,

I agree with the article. Kids shouldn't be allowed to make those decisions until they are old enough to make decisions. If a kid is too young to be given responsibilities and make correct choices... they are too young. And to me, wanting to wear that type of clothing is an incorrect choice or a irresponsible action, therefore making the child ineligible to wear them!!! HA
I agree with the article, FT and Bella made some real good points here. But you know it doesn't stop at age 8! I see them younger, I mean come on! A little girl should be dress as such not as an adult! These day's it's hard for a man, he really does't know how old the girl is really! If she looks older what is he to think? The parents of these children should THINK! Be responsible! Some very good points made here. Parent's wake up and smell the coffee! Before someone mistakes your 12 year old for a 17 or even 18 year old! 🙁 Tracy
 
A lot of the blame has to lie with the pop stars that the kids look up to, which is something that really annoys me. It's somehow fine for Britney and Christina to dance around wearing next to nothing and singing about sex, but if any rock band swears it gets cut instantly. What's more damaging???

It really made be laugh when Limp Bizkit weren't only blanked out from saying 'pissed' which is a pretty mild swearword, and then Fred Durst had a muffle over his mouth as well!!! Also, when rock stars give us the finger but have it blurred out. Doesn't that draw more attention to it???

So yeah... it's all down to hypocritical and ignorant values. But if there's money at stake, people won't want to change anything. Grrr...
 
I second Lynchy on that statement. Hey Lynch, can you say S Club Juniors?

I remember what I read somewhere about a 7 year-old kid telling his teacher that someone insulted him. He was called a "virgin". Goes to show how much sex is infiltrating every market around. So much for political correctness. They bleep out swear words and rude finger gestures but they show Robbie Williams pretending to suck cock (which he does, that limey bitch).

It is kind of chilling that pre-teen girls dress up like hookers. I think the parents had to buy them that stuff just to keep them happy. It's a parent's role. But they're helpless against this propoganda. And as for paedophiles, well, they must be the most happy out of all of this. I'm thinking though... are these executives who are selling this stuff paedophiles too?
 
Quoting Chimp:
"I'm thinking though... are these executives who are selling this stuff paedophiles too?"

No, they're *****s.

The problem I see here is that too many parents refuse to take responsibility and actually be parents. Our oldest is 22 - problem wasn't as bad when she was a teeny bopper. Still, there were some clothes we refused to buy, and refused to allow her to buy on her own. We now apply the same rules to the 10 yr old. If more parents did the same, those industry *****s wouldn't be making costumes that make kids look like sluts.

Strelnikov
 
I watched a documentary on childrens' pageants and dress styles. One of the investigators of pedophiles stated that EVERY case in which he investigated a crime of this nature,there were pictures of small kids in such clothing as is discussed here,as well as "sexy" costumes
from beauty pageants.The more adult and sexy looking the child's costume,the more the person in question was "interested".

Who needs kiddie porn when the kids are walking around in what excites these people almost as much,and it's legal?
 
Biggles, thanks for the article--I had no idea this type of clothing was being marketed to minors! :sowrong: Shame on the Olsen twins. 😡 I think the manufacture and sale of this provocative "children's" attire should be banned. It's almost as bad as selling cigarettes to underage folks! 🙁
 
Well,

Ultimately it's the parents choice. Seven year old kids aren't old enough to go shopping for themselves. Parents do. And if parents allow this... how can we control the downfall of society?
 
In May this year, Abercrombie & Fitch had been marketing a line of thong panties for children with the words "eye candy" and "wink wink" printed on the front.

BUT they caved to pressure applied through e-mails and phonecalls by a conservative activism group called OneMillionMoms.com. I'm a member and I wrote one of those e-mails. A&F thongs for kids are history. It's a triumph for decency.

They've been very successful at pressuring TV sponsors to withdraw their support of primetime programming that contains sexual or violent content. If anyone else here would like to help effect change like in this way, please check them out at http://www.onemillionmoms.com

I don't respond to every notice I receive because I don't agree with everything OneMillionMoms takes aim against. E.g., I have no problem with porn movies being available in Marriott hotel rooms.
 
What's New

2/7/2025
The Gathering forums are there to help you find who is meeting, when and where!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top