random pics 4 (f/f toe bite)

[Everlast_420]

.........words can't describe this pic.......you have to see it for yourselves........

 

[Barefoot_Sis]

Now this is what I call a foot-eating sole-tickler.

 

[GiveMeFeet]

I believe this wins for "oldest resurrected thread of all time". NEARLY 8 YEARS??~!?

(Is there a way that threads can automatically be closed after a certain period of inactivity?)

 

[reeperolaughter]

your certainly rt, that is hard one to describe with words, and is a fantastic pic

 

[Jeebusaurus]

zombie threads are running rampant . . . lol

 

[dentrag1231]

This forum REALLY needs an autolock for old threads. The amount of crazy bumps that happen are insane.

 

[juggernaut]

Hey, whiney babies...

The lame part here isn't the age of the thread or photo, it's the "OMG SOMETHING MUST BE DONE" reaction to it. I've seen several things come up over the years that I missed the first time around. On one hand, you all talk about the "classics" where it pertains to some vids or pic collections. With this attitude, they should just die after a predetermined time. So what... any vids from, say... Tickle Abuse... should just be locked away in 5 years never to be seen again?

As for resurrecting old threads, I'll agree that there's no reason to bump anything relating to the 2004 Presidential Election or the thread "How do you think Seinfeld will end?!??!" But as far as pics, vids, or art is concerned, I don't see how a foot tickling hog-tie photo stops being relevant in a tickling/fetish forum.

 

[dentrag1231]

There's a difference between locking threads and deleting them

 

[juggernaut]

There's a difference between locking threads and deleting them

I'll give you that. But you lock a thread like this, no one can simply ask "Is there more to this series? Does anyone have the vid? Know the producer?" etc. I'm not the welcome wagon here, but rather just thinking of people who're newer. This particular bump was harmless.

In the past, there have been newbies who bump 30 threads at a time saying "Awesome." No need for that. But one? Didn't bother me.

 

[GiveMeFeet]

Complaining? Jeebus. Who's complaining? I just noted the age of the thread in this specific case.

Nerrad, the 30 bumps at a time by the n00bz is primarily why I asked if it were possible to lock these things up after a time. I just chose to ask the question in this thread.

And, if I were lurking around some old archives (which I do plenty) and found a "locked" thread due to age, it's not too terribly difficult to start a new one with a link to the old one (or just d/l and re-u/l the pic in question). At least in that way you or I or anyone with something constructive to say would know that the originator is knowingly bringing a "classic" back to the front.

I don't know how many regulars will feel uncomfortable when the day comes where someone new to the community will reply to an old thread from BrendanBkr saying, "Cool! Can u post more pls?"

 

[dentrag1231]

Nerrad: A good point. Though I will maintain that, as you stated, something is wrong when the entire first page is 5 year old topics bumped by the same guy.

And I do find it annoying when people make comments rendered irrelevant by time, or asking a question that was already asked and answered without looking past the first post. Though I guess the latter doesn't depend on the age.

 

[Everlast_420]

.... Boosh! My thread returns!!!!!! Zombie thread!!!!!!!!


..... I'd like to thank everyone that made this thread bumping possible: my parents, God, the chihuahua Snickers from next door that always barks at 3 am....... you've really made this day a magical one......