Rape Tickling

[FeatherFeet]

(first off I apologize for my spelling, it sucks I know)

Does anyone here feel that people sometimes go a lil, or alot too far with tickling? I mean Im all for tickle torture if its consenual, even non consensual if the person deserves it, to a point. But I believe there is a point that goes beyond humane actions and morals.

I'm not dissing people who have fantasies of such things, like extreme non consensual tickling and such. I'm talking about the people who will go that far in real life. Like restrain someone, totally without their permission and tickle them to far far beyond hysterics. Even go as far to tickle private areas such as balls or boobs or clit. Or even without those areas, just tickle someone without permission to near insanity.

I mean, fantasys are one thing, but the real thing, in most if not all states and countries, its gotta be illegal. And definatly immoral. (Repeat I am not talking about a time that someone tied up a sibling or a friend or girlfriend and tickled them for an hour to find out where their hat was, or just to get bk at them for something. I am talking about complete and utter non permission non excusable torture, for no other reason than to sexually excite the tormentor.) Thats borderline sadism. And against the law.

I read recently a story where someone allowed his wife to be "rape tickled" by his neighbors and did nothing about it. And the neighbors went as far to violate the wife, by taking off her bra and tickling her breats, while she was drunk and without permission. Theres still some discussion if its a real story of a fantasy or not. Regardless I think that real true to life stories about things that are illegal like that, and beyond a point of humane action, borderline sadism should not be allowed. I mean, lets face it, there are alot of people out there sort of weirded out by the tickle community, and things like that, stories of true life illegal situations, obductions, half rapes and violations on our sites isnt really helping that fact. In fact, thignsl like that are probably turning alot of people off of the site. (Im not talking about fantasy stories of it, everyone has weird fantasys, one of mine being tickling natalie portman for a week straight to punish her for saying that bad dialouge in episode 3 😀 ) but when sometihng is real, and has happened in actuality, thats illegal, totally imoral and inhuman like that, and its posted on the site for people to get off of, it makes us look really really bad. and is bad for crying out loud.

its not really much different than is someone had a site dedicated to posting about rapes. cuz to us, its kind of the parallel to it. I dont think anyone would say that someone getting rapped for hours is cool. isnt extreme extreme and merciless non consensual tickling kind of the same thing to us? ESPECIALLY when private parts are brought into it. I mean, situations like that can have reprucissions on someone their whole life. Just the same as a rape.

Does anyone agree with me on this? That real life tickle rape stories of that extreme should be banned cuz they are not only illegal but immoral??

please someone agree with me here. please, let me kno I'm not alone.

(kinda feeling like a loner here on this one.)

 

[footweargoblin]

It's rather nice to see the discussions that have sprouted up around here lately. Many of them have been honest expressions of feelings, and have resulted in topics that most of us can relate to.

Forced tickling (non-consentual, non-fantasy) is just as severe as rape, forced oral sex, or unwanted touching. It is an unwelcome sexual act and is considered to be sexual assault. When filling out an incident report for such acts, law enforcement officers must look for a variety of things considered to be sexual perversions depending on the context: fondling, kissing, spanking, masturbation, ejaculation, biting, bondage, penetration, etc. And these are just the tame ones. The list is a long one, featuring an average of 60-75 different sexual offences.

Tickling is on that list.

Sexual predators differ from your average, every day fetishist in one major way: they act out fantasies that the rest of us wouldn't. Every serial rapist imagines committing the assault numerous times before actually going through with it just once. For some, the thrill is in the planning, not the execution. They have hid their imaginations since childhood, using magazines, videos, or awkward experiences with girlfriends as an outlet for what they fantasize doing to complete strangers. Eventually these outlets aren't enough to satisfy growing cravings, and they seek out bigger and longer lasting thrills. They act out the fantasy, often finding that reality can't live up to the imagination's creativity and attention to detail. So they repeat the act with a new victim, hoping to improve the level of success.

Some of them do not develop normal sexual practices, and in turn, use their fetish as a sexual crutch. And when they can't find a partner that can relate, the frustration leads to fantasy, then to planning, and finally to execution.

To a certain extent, we are like that as well. Most of us hid our fetish at an early age, thinking it un-natural behaviour. Magazines, videos, and sometimes television and movies fuel our fantasy. We tickle siblings, cousins, dates, and spouses. We fantasize about tickling that cute girl from the book store, that hunky young man cleaning the pool, or even those two college girls walking through the food court of the mall. Whatever the fantasy, whatever the imagined scenario, it's just one step removed from making us sexual predators.

Luckily, actual sexual predators rarely turn to tickle torture as a method of sexual release. If you think about all the S&M clubs - where people specialize in sexual domination and controlled abuse - it's incredible just how socially semi-taboo it is becoming. While still not socially acceptable, handcuffs and ballgags, silk scarves and bedposts, leather and lace, are all growing in popularity in today's society. And bondage-related sexual assaults are on the rise as well.

If one day tickling becomes more recognized in mainstream America, could non-consentual tickling offences more common?

Responsibility on the part of producers is a step in the right direction. Keeping material realistic is fine, as long as it isn't actual forced tickling with a non-consenting and unwilling participant. But in the end, no matter what we as a community do to limit those types of influences, predators are going to fantasize. Serial rapists operate even though forced, non-consentual sex is not legal. Child molesters function when they are fully aware that child pornography is illegal. All we can do is hope to notice behaviour that hints of dangerous obsessions, and then act accordingly.

Even that carries a slim margin of success.

 

[XaviarRkR]

As with everything, yes it can go too far. To me anything - be it tickling, sex - should be concensual, with no manipulation of those who are vunourable and/or impreshonable. There are some clips I have seen where the lee was clearly not enjoying it and looked to be in a lot of pain.

 

[ShadowTklr]

Censorhip Of Imagination? Get Real

(first off I apologize for my spelling, it sucks I know)

Does anyone here feel that people sometimes go a lil, or alot too far with tickling? I mean Im all for tickle torture if its consenual, even non consensual if the person deserves it, to a point. But I believe there is a point that goes beyond humane actions and morals.

I'm not dissing people who have fantasies of such things, like extreme non consensual tickling and such. I'm talking about the people who will go that far in real life. Like restrain someone, totally without their permission and tickle them to far far beyond hysterics. Even go as far to tickle private areas such as balls or boobs or clit. Or even without those areas, just tickle someone without permission to near insanity.

I mean, fantasys are one thing, but the real thing, in most if not all states and countries, its gotta be illegal. And definatly immoral. (Repeat I am not talking about a time that someone tied up a sibling or a friend or girlfriend and tickled them for an hour to find out where their hat was, or just to get bk at them for something. I am talking about complete and utter non permission non excusable torture, for no other reason than to sexually excite the tormentor.) Thats borderline sadism. And against the law.

I read recently a story where someone allowed his wife to be "rape tickled" by his neighbors and did nothing about it. And the neighbors went as far to violate the wife, by taking off her bra and tickling her breats, while she was drunk and without permission. Theres still some discussion if its a real story of a fantasy or not. Regardless I think that real true to life stories about things that are illegal like that, and beyond a point of humane action, borderline sadism should not be allowed. I mean, lets face it, there are alot of people out there sort of weirded out by the tickle community, and things like that, stories of true life illegal situations, obductions, half rapes and violations on our sites isnt really helping that fact. In fact, thignsl like that are probably turning alot of people off of the site. (Im not talking about fantasy stories of it, everyone has weird fantasys, one of mine being tickling natalie portman for a week straight to punish her for saying that bad dialouge in episode 3 😀 ) but when sometihng is real, and has happened in actuality, thats illegal, totally imoral and inhuman like that, and its posted on the site for people to get off of, it makes us look really really bad. and is bad for crying out loud.

its not really much different than is someone had a site dedicated to posting about rapes. cuz to us, its kind of the parallel to it. I dont think anyone would say that someone getting rapped for hours is cool. isnt extreme extreme and merciless non consensual tickling kind of the same thing to us? ESPECIALLY when private parts are brought into it. I mean, situations like that can have reprucissions on someone their whole life. Just the same as a rape.

Does anyone agree with me on this? That real life tickle rape stories of that extreme should be banned cuz they are not only illegal but immoral??

please someone agree with me here. please, let me kno I'm not alone.

(kinda feeling like a loner here on this one.)

First, my agreement. Yes, sometimes people go too far, and that is wrong. Now for the rest of my response:

Your post is highly disturbing because it calls for blanket censorship, and it needs to be identified, and denounced, not embraced. What is far more troublesome is that you dare throw stones with your own glass house squarely behind you. What YOU find palatable to you, is certainly valid, for you. For you to promote the idea that the rest of us should BAN material that you think is objectionable is censorship. People post stories in tickling forums because they feel surrounded by other people who are understanding of the varied shades of this erotic fetish. For you to make such statements within the confines of this “community” is plainly unfair, and contrary to the nature of a fetish that you yourself share.

Has it occurred to you yet, that society at large already thinks that YOU are immoral? Anyone who finds tickling, or FEET to be an arousing activity or object, consensual or otherwise, is sick and should be banned from being able to spin their propaganda to others under the guise of "Playfulness" or "just for fun." What kind of responsible ADULT derives pleasure from tickling the feet of other adults, in many cases while they're (gasp) tied? It's damn disturbing, and immoral, I tell ya, and you are condemned in their eyes! (Somebody light the pyre, and let's get this over with)

Should they ban the entire tickling fetish from existence because THEY don't like what we like? How about simply making your behavior illegal in its entirety. I say this, because that's the parallel argument when you start talking about what is and what is not acceptable fantasy material to some (mainly, you). And by the way, how the hell did the story you cite in your post move up the ranks from being questionable, to being "True life" in only the span of your writing?

Your post started out with an inflammatory, and completely erroneous phrase, "tickle-rape," which, in your mind is the excessive non-consensual tickling of another. Your example was someone tying somebody up against their will and then tickling them far beyond their ability to tolerate it. In reality, that's called "Kidnapping,” “wrongful imprisonment,” “Sexual Sadism,” and “Assault," NOT rape. Rape is a specific type of assault, and is defined as forcible sexual intercourse. Anything less than intercourse is considered a "Sexual Assault." This is why Molestation is not called Touch-Rape, and Sodomy is not called Oral-Rape (unless of course there was anal penetration, at which point is identified as Rape & Sodomy).

For most of us, tickling is sexual, or at least creates sexual titillation, be it psychological, or physical. Depending upon the era in which you grew up, tickling was most likely portrayed in cartoons and movies as a playful, or comedic type of "torture." Therefore, fantasies of "Tickle Torture" are the staple of many fetishists’ desire diet, and will many times involve associated sexuality, and YES, within the scope of the story and the circumstances, that will sometimes include non-consensual sexual touching, masturbation, forced sexual arousal, and forced climax.

So, please, rollup your flag of censorship, pull it back into your window of personal objection, and read something inoffensive. Better yet, WRITE something of your own, and stop criticizing others for the expression of their fantasies.

 

[morgandee]

a big concern that occurs is that people like to claim freedom of expression

but then they don't sign up for the army--the army that fights for your so-called freedom to express yourselves--because they are "conscientious objectors"! and yet they clap for us at airports in stupid anheuser busch commercials FUCK YOU ASSHOLES

okay just kidding wai wai teehee giggle blush =^.^= anyway

it's not just that people get carried away but the fact that they get so pompous about themselves that they surround themselves with some kind of retarded mental barrier that says "no, you can't make fun of this guy because he is expressing himself freely"

my friend, making fun of your ass is us expressing ourselves freely

i kick ass and take names!

seriously, people have fantasies, that's a given whether or not they admit to it, and who are we to argue against that, but that's the thing, we aren't arguing against that, we're arguing against the possibility that someone might act out on those fantasies, you know, like the monkey-see-monkey-do autistic people (OH GOD I CALLED SOMEONE AUTISTIC FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OH GOD DONT KILL ME I AM JUST EXPRESSING MYSELF FREELY I AM NOT A HYPOCRITE) would do, because they can't make as clear discernments as hopefully the average (assuming the average is somewhere in the not rape people zone) person

i make fun of people all day for their what i like to call stupid shitty mundanities, and they call me out for oppressing their freedom of expression? you're oppressing your own shy ass self with your freedom of expression don't be handing out jibbajabba about freedom of expression

sorry i am vent NO I AM NOT SORRY FUCK SOCIETY GRR LIMP BIZKIT SONG

anyway now i can be relevant (you could have skipped the upper part to this point)

it's hard to say if people go to far, but only because you can't tell where people might draw the line between their actions and expressions, and one person could be afraid to call out a possibility for fear that everybody else may think that person is being too uptight about everything and should just let it go and if someone is raping you, let it go and it'll just transform into consentual sex

but the problem doesn't exist in that it exists in a person's tendency to get overly pompous about himself and for no reason, and without realizing what a hypocrite he is being about himself, like when he gets mad that someone is making fun of his fantasies, and to that i would say so fucking what, i mean if expressing rape is good and making fun of you is bad, then soldier, you have the wrong fucking priorities

but you can't get moralistic about it, because it just looks preachy. i'm not saying let it go because that's not fair for anybody to just say let it go and anybody who says so is a cheap son of a bitch, i'm saying just be a little more smart about how you approach a person expressing fantasies such as, uh, tickle-rape(?)

--end of relevant portion

 

[FeatherFeet]

lol dude, I said several times I am not talking against fantasies. I am talking about censorship of people posting REAL LIFE STORIES OF TICKLE RAPE. not that hard to understand.

 

[morgandee]

okay sold

my post was actually meant as a response to something else but now i get to you

but it will be similar to what i said before is that you can't just outright ban something because that's just suppressing the facts, again, you gotta take things in the smart way, not the hard way

fantasy or fact, it's all words on the screen, that's not gonna affect whether they actually did what they did or not, and it's not gonna change how people jack off to those stories, at least, it won't change by itself, and it won't change just by banning it, or the fact that someone agrees with you won't change whatever goes on in the non internet world also known to most of us hermits as "IRL" wtf retarded

but feel free to blow that idea off as i don't give a shit

and i don't give a shit
about youuuuu o/~
that pussy ass
sounds of white people playing jazz

 

[somebody231]

.

this is only my point of view, but I think everyone should have their fantasies... I don't care how sick they'd be... even if it was about minors.
I just don't want any actions been taken on any victim, especially not minors.

I dunno if I made myself clear, but I'll explain:
Humen are not pure, they never were, they'll never be.
Some can't help about thinking of sick things, but still are decent people, who help other people in distress and stuff.

C'moon... think about it if in the future there'd be some sort of implants in everyone's head and if you'd accidently (not even wanting to) think about something sick, you'd be in the joint!

I think everyone deserves to have their own sexual fantasies... just not do them to any victims... except perhaps a girlfriend/boyfriend...

Anyone is free to accuse that my reply was of no idea, but I'll stick on to it.

1 more example: If my best friend was a necrophiliac and he'd dream about f***ing corpses (yuck, disgusting... reaaaally sick) or getting someone's poop in his mouth (yuck again... sick!) and would not do any harm to anyone or put these things in motion ... He'd still be my best friend 😉

 

[mlemmon1]

Stop with the lobbying for Censorship

If you don't like the story, then don't read it. Pretty simple. So simple, in fact, that it seems anyone can understand it.

 

[FeatherFeet]

hey mlemmon, so its cool to post a story about raping someone and then beating the fuck outta someone to near death as long as it invovles tickling huh? but posting something like that is ok, just dont read it? gotcha.........dumbass

 

[morgandee]

haha rofl mlemmon enjoys rape haha lol rape rofl (rofl stands for raping on the floor laughing)

 

[Kalamos]

Orcamiseria, that Iriya guy is completely unhinged.

...

I sort of like him.

...

Ah, FeatherFeet, I read your opening post.
Couldn't help but wonder: are you for or against forced tickling?

You called it as bad, but you lingered on it, describing the grisly details

"Even go as far to tickle private areas such as balls or boobs or clit. Or even without those areas, just tickle someone without permission to near insanity."

It felt like you enjoyed typing about it, like a wet fantasy of yours about a taboo topic.

Just wondering...

...

Ah, ShadowTklr IMO has a point about calling things by their right names.
If you find stories or contents you disagree with, you should report them to mods.

...

Dum de dum.

 

[MistressValerie1]

It would be impractical for us to prohibit non-consensual stories, since even most of the supposedly real-life non-con experiences are actually fictional.

If you observe a post in which someone is advocating the commission of a crime or purposely trying to stir up trouble, please report it as Kalamos says.

 

[ShadowTklr]

lol dude, I said several times I am not talking against fantasies. I am talking about censorship of people posting REAL LIFE STORIES OF TICKLE RAPE. not that hard to understand.

I understand, and understood the distinction you were claiming to make. The problem is, without the benefit of a crystal ball telling you which is which, doesn't ALL fiction that is written surrounding characters in a present day setting LOOK like it could be true life? Isn't that sometimes the whole point of the story? And, who exactly makes the decision as to whether or not this is fiction or true life? More importantly, can you cite a single instance in which you have read an actual account of true rape and torture on this forum?

All I'm saying, is that despite your claim that fantasy is fantasy, the only stories that I can think of that would fall victim to this type of censorship, would be those that actually ARE fantasy stories. So, don't misunderstand me. I know you think you're separating the two, but the stories that might best support your example of content considered unbefitting this forum, are fantasy stories.

 

[ShadowTklr]

a big concern that occurs is that people like to claim freedom of expression...

...anyway now i can be relevant (you could have skipped the upper part to this point)

it's hard to say if people go to far, but only because you can't tell where people might draw the line between their actions and expressions, and one person could be afraid to call out a possibility for fear that everybody else may think that person is being too uptight about everything and should just let it go and if someone is raping you, let it go and it'll just transform into consentual sex

but the problem doesn't exist in that it exists in a person's tendency to get overly pompous about himself and for no reason, and without realizing what a hypocrite he is being about himself, like when he gets mad that someone is making fun of his fantasies, and to that i would say so fucking what, i mean if expressing rape is good and making fun of you is bad, then soldier, you have the wrong fucking priorities

but you can't get moralistic about it, because it just looks preachy. i'm not saying let it go because that's not fair for anybody to just say let it go and anybody who says so is a cheap son of a bitch, i'm saying just be a little more smart about how you approach a person expressing fantasies such as, uh, tickle-rape(?)

--end of relevant portion

At your suggestion, I have skipped the upper part of your post as it is filled with aimless deprecation, and gratuitous self-aggrandizing. Unfortunately, I haven't had too much more success in deciphering the rest of your post either. I'll respond to what I think you might be saying, so forgive me in advance if I misinterpret your true meaning.

It looks like you're saying that people might become gun-shy about reporting what they believe to be an actual account of rape in a story because other people may think them to be uptight. Well, that's a possibility. I myself, would never shy away from reporting something horrible that clearly looked as though it was real. An example might be a story portraying an incident that was clearly true, as reported in the newspaper or on TV. But, this has never happened. That’s why the point of this discussion was moot from the very beginning.

You lose me entirely in the second paragraph as your post morphs into this thing about people being upset because you make fun of their fantasies. I don't get it. I don't remember anyone "making fun" of fantasies, and I certainly never got "mad" about it.

As far as identifying the "preachy" nature of my post, I say thank you. That is testimony to my ability to convey ideas in the manner in which I conceive them. It was intended to be a warning post to bring about the awareness of possibly crying wolf, which could have a definite impact on fantasy stories. The bottom line is, if you start looking for these true life accounts, you're going to start finding (see Inventing) them. Authors may start getting gun-shy about writing such stories, and as a result, censorship has taken hold in the form of intimidation.

Lastly, the "tickle rape" phrase is not “expressing fantasies,” as you put it. It was, and is a catch-phrase, used by Featherfeet to give emotional weight to something that he perceives to exist.

 

[FeatherFeet]

I understand, and understood the distinction you were claiming to make. The problem is, without the benefit of a crystal ball telling you which is which, doesn't ALL fiction that is written surrounding characters in a present day setting LOOK like it could be true life? Isn't that sometimes the whole point of the story? And, who exactly makes the decision as to whether or not this is fiction or true life? More importantly, can you cite a single instance in which you have read an actual account of true rape and torture on this forum?

All I'm saying, is that despite your claim that fantasy is fantasy, the only stories that I can think of that would fall victim to this type of censorship, would be those that actually ARE fantasy stories. So, don't misunderstand me. I know you think you're separating the two, but the stories that might best support your example of content considered unbefitting this forum, are fantasy stories.

Try reading the TRUE stories "My first wife" and "my first wife part 2" in the story section which a guy describes the true events of him setting up his wife to be held against her will by his neighbors and tickle tortured while drunk to hysterics. and they go as far as removing her bra and tickling her boobs, without permission.

 

[Kalamos]

Try reading the TRUE stories "My first wife" and "my first wife part 2" in the story section.

I'd say: report it to the mods, and let them decide.

We can't have a preemptive control feature. It would burden mods with extra work and slow forum down while they check files being uploaded for questionable contents.

I can't still see your point, though.
You witness a crime, you call the cops. You don't loiter about, arguing about it with your neighbours.

...

Dum de dum.

 

[IslandMan]

supporting freedom of expression and appreciation of any contributions...

I agree with ShadowTklr (and oriyaborealis and others).

FeatherNuts is now displaying some obsessive behavior.
Why doesn't he start an e-mail or letter campaign to ban explicit lyrics in rap music supporting violence ?!?
Which is worse: Non-consensual tickling or advocating killing cops ??? Anyone want to buy a soapbox ?

Let those who want to express indulge fantasies - here in this forum - do their thing. Let those who do not agree, or find a topic objectionable, read something else. Move on.
There are so many other causes that deserve attention: charities, diseases, etc. - not to mention raising money to buy medication for FeatherNuts....
And....as to whether or not anyone (FeatherNuts) is an accomplished author - yeah, right, sure you are.... Take whatever modicum of self-deprecation you occasionally demonstrate and stick it up your tight @ss. Your lousy spelling and grammar are exemplary compared to your attitude. You want to criticize others but can't handle it when criticism comes your way. That attitude blows polar bears....big fuffy white ones (and, BTW, those polar bears are being blown without their consent - it's arctic ursine rape -- golly, I hope they're not being tickled, too). What a troglodyte.

Let's try to show our appreciation to those who labor to contribute to this forum.

 

[sydarris]

lowleah here, the writer of that rickled wife story. Thanks for all of the attention. You know, there are about a trillion novels. Fiction, mind you. But the author's purpose is realism so that many if not all of his readers "get into it all" and a part of their beings starts to think that whatever is going on is really going on. Do I have to point this out to anyone? Huh? Novels with rape or murder or multiple murders or mayhem and chaos and victimizations of every tint and hue.

I refuse to put a disclaimer with my wife story. Every reader can and will decide if anything or everything actually happened, or if I even have a "first wife". Seems some think my account is real, why that's flattery, thank you. I ain't tellin so you whoever feather quitcher yellin'--in fact, quitcher readin' also. P.S.--Did Mickey Spillane ever have this trouble?

 

[sydarris]

I just may be immature, but all of the extra chit-chat has for me destroyed the mood and tone and zest, I am taking my marbles and going home. As for anuthing further of my story, it's like they say about Mozart following his death, I am decomposing.

 

[ticklemad]

As someone who has been raped as an adult and sexually abused as a child via the use of tickling, then Yes I find it quite sick that people fantasize about that sort of thing, but having said that, if it wasn't for places like here and the gentle understanding nature of some of the guys I have spoken to and met, I know my recovery would have taken a whole lot longer.

 

[FeatherFeet]

im sorry to hear that ticklemad, and your write. Im not saying anything against the forum, just about the sick f***'s who post shit like that. where their actually enjoying rape.

 

[CoopXLR]

(first off I apologize for my spelling, it sucks I know)

Does anyone here feel that people sometimes go a lil, or alot too far with tickling? I mean Im all for tickle torture if its consenual, even non consensual if the person deserves it, to a point. But I believe there is a point that goes beyond humane actions and morals.

I'm not dissing people who have fantasies of such things, like extreme non consensual tickling and such. I'm talking about the people who will go that far in real life. Like restrain someone, totally without their permission and tickle them to far far beyond hysterics. Even go as far to tickle private areas such as balls or boobs or clit. Or even without those areas, just tickle someone without permission to near insanity.

STOP!! STOP IT!! You're making me horny!!

Thats borderline sadism.

No it is sadism, plain and simple.

I read recently a story where someone allowed his wife to be "rape tickled" by his neighbors and did nothing about it. And the neighbors went as far to violate the wife, by taking off her bra and tickling her breats, while she was drunk and without permission.

Now that is sick! Makes my stomach turn.

Theres still some discussion if its a real story of a fantasy or not. Regardless I think that real true to life stories about things that are illegal like that, and beyond a point of humane action, borderline sadism should not be allowed. I mean, lets face it, there are alot of people out there sort of weirded out by the tickle community, and things like that, stories of true life illegal situations, obductions, half rapes and violations on our sites isnt really helping that fact.

I haven't seen any stories like that here.

In fact, thignsl like that are probably turning alot of people off of the site. (Im not talking about fantasy stories of it, everyone has weird fantasys, one of mine being tickling natalie portman for a week straight to punish her for saying that bad dialouge in episode 3 😀 ) but when sometihng is real, and has happened in actuality, thats illegal, totally imoral and inhuman like that, and its posted on the site for people to get off of, it makes us look really really bad. and is bad for crying out loud.

I see your point. Things of that nature are wicked.

isnt extreme extreme and merciless non consensual tickling kind of the same thing to us? ESPECIALLY when private parts are brought into it. I mean, situations like that can have reprucissions on someone their whole life. Just the same as a rape.

I agree.

Does anyone agree with me on this? That real life tickle rape stories of that extreme should be banned cuz they are not only illegal but immoral??

please someone agree with me here. please, let me kno I'm not alone.

(kinda feeling like a loner here on this one.)

You're not alone on this. Until you told about the dude who let those guys do that to his poor, drunk wife it didn't sound so bad but, now it does. That is just disgusting!


EDIT: Hold up! When you said "Tickle Rape" you didn't mean a combo of tickling and rape, did you? If that's the case then maybe I need to revaluate my position on this. I'll just have to read the story/stories for myself before I make my decision on this. That is if they are still here.

 

[sydarris]

Alas and indeed, if anyone/everyone of you emails me regards my privately emailing you back my story(stories), that will work. Getting an email from you acts as an automatic disclaimer, tells me you WANT more, and without question or complaint (Bob and Linda know few limits)

 

[sydarris]

My email addy is [email protected]

And also, I am the one who first here coined the phrase rape-tickle. In this 'rape' is meant to be an adjective/adverb to intensify 'tickle'. I.E., serious tickling, severe tickling, tickling that is opposite of the merely playful or momentary. Agressive, relentless and endless.