For all you nay-sayers, here it is... :grind_tee
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\04\13\story_13-4-2006_pg7_53
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2006\04\13\story_13-4-2006_pg7_53
TickledToDeath said:It almost appears as if that ONE LINE "they tickled his armpits...." was casually added in by someone else and not part of the story.
I would not worry about that.The normos out there ca'nt understand the concept of tickle torture.The guy in the article obviously was being tickled,but everyone thinks the"goat lick" shreds the skin off your feet.I've actually tried this,and let me tell ya,It's the ULTIMATE soft tickle.It would take 100 years for a goat to shred any skin,even after you soften them in salt water. The only animals that I know of ,that have been known to lick the skin off of humans, are lions.Complexity said:The first story was more understandable. The ancient Japanese Empresses used this to make their prisoners confess, it was a form of torture in which left no permanant physical or mental mark. I can understand their use of it. It's pretty conventional and I doubt it's any worse then what any of us do to our 'lees. The second story made me realize how much of a SOB that guy was. I never understood the exact extent of his...
wretchedness before. When you think about it, Saddam could be giving normal, american ticklers a bad name. For example: "So, do you like tickling? I do.." "You mean like that Sodamn Insane guy? Police! Police!" Though this may be a bit exagerated, you get my point. I wish some people just knew when to stop.
IrishTickle said:What's odd is that in the stories section, stories involving women being kidnapped and quite viciously tickle tortured are very popular. Art imitates life and peoples morals change.