Seurity Guard Tales

[flecke1]

Hello everyone,

This is my first post but I thought I had to share the recent details off my new job. I work for a Hostpital as a Security Guard, and I work at night. I discovered recently, that we have people the sleep over in the Intensive Care Units waiting room. Now, don't get me wrong I am sorry that they are going through a stressful time...but it has opened up avenues for me. Here are a couple of them:

One night when I was on Interior patrol I happened to walk through the ICU waiting area to discover a woman sleeping on a couch. She was face down and had a blanket over her, but to my satisfaction, it was not on her feet. She had on black nylons and I could see that she also had socks on at one time because they were in her shoes on the floor. I also noticed that her nylons had several holes in them around the toe area. So I went to our security desk and grabbed a pair of scissors and went back. I went down very quietly and cut the nylons off her toes only, and went to work. I ran my fingers all over those exposed toes and we delighted to hear her giggle in her sleep. I knew I didn't have much time to I peeled back one of the nylons to reveal a bare, soft wrinkly sole and went to work there tickling all over it. I was happy that her sole started to wrinkle even more and her toes curl up. One last final touch was that I got to tickle her toes with my tounge...boy that was good. The next shift I was asked if I knew anything about alterations done to a womans nylons...I said no.

Last one. We have a Indian Reservation about 30 miles from where I live and so there are several Native American people that come into the ICU as well, and with them comes thier families. Well another night I was walking through the ICU and I found a gold mine. A 20's female with her bare feet draping over a couch arm. Now let me tell you. Female Native Americans have the best feet. Her shoe size was probably 10 or 11, they were thick, very soft and very pink (soles) and those toes...OMG....big plump...to die for. Anyways I knelt down by them and started to tickle those soles...they started to move and bounce and wrinkle and those big ole toes started to curl. Wow, I did this for about 20 min...then To top it off I licked with a full tounge up each sole about 4 times each....and at the end of each lick I was greeted to curled toes....My point is...anyone wants to tickle on the job...become a Security Guard at night at a Hospital

Happy tickling.

 

[joker-champ]

you are sick....cutting off nylons...licking feet you need help. you give us honest fun ticklers a bad reputation. couldn't you have just tickled the bare or nylon foot and left it at that?

 

[XxMystxX]

you are sick....cutting off nylons...licking feet you need help. you give us honest fun ticklers a bad reputation. couldn't you have just tickled the bare or nylon foot and left it at that?

One day...when I am finally made a mod and "Red Hammer" law comes down upon this forum, annoying trolls like you are going to be banned for good.

Just you wait...😡 just you wait...

---------------------

Excellent story, friend, continue to post more at your leisure.

 

[GEORGIATKLER]

It Was #3 With Scissors And A Ball Point Pen...

"someone Call Security"....... Oh, Yeah ....... I Think You Are Taking A Big Risk And Will Sooner Or Later Get Fired( At Least). You Are An Adult, But The Scenes Read Like Somthing Out Of A Crime Blotter Section In A Newspaper Or Magazine.

 

[trainmaster500]

I agree with everyone here... people come in to ICU because their loved ones are seriously injured. Taking advantage of them because they are vulnerable is completely wrong... someone ought to locate your IP address and report you to the authorities for that kind of actions. That is called sexual assult and can result in a stiff sentence.

 

[a1532b]

Cutting off her nylons while she's sleeping in the ICU waiting room and then licking her feet? Sir, don't you have any moral values? -.-

 

[XxMystxX]

It begs to question if the story is even true.

I agree his actions aren't totally admirable, but as this is an internet forum, and these two "victims" have not been stated to be underage, I feel it is a member's obligation to criticize in a wholesome manner as most of you have done.

However, a sudden, "U stup3d! You disgust me!" reply is still trolling, regardless of the original post.

 

[coloman]

You are very lucky that you have not been cought in the act and fired. You truly are a sick man to take advantage of people in an ICU who are exhausted because they spend every moment they are awake with a family member who is very sick or maybe even terminal. If you had written a story about tickling your girfriends feet like this while she slept it would have been fine but you were way out of line to tickle and lick the feet of the women you did this to and you never should have written a story about your demented exploits.

 

[bigpoppadiesel]

i really hope that isnt true. if it is i highly recommend taking a piece of rope, tieing one end to a tree and one to your neck. next jump off chair. repeat as necessary.

 

[flecke1]

All of you are just jealous and I bet that you would do the exact same thing...so fuck off.

 

[skev4]

Oh, the pain of the outcasts is insufferable!

I hate fetish-mongerers who insist their fetish is more appropriate than others.

One time, a long long time ago, there were two people. Both were cursed by their makers to be obsessed with a solitary item. For the Tystists this was a large green scarf that was passed around to the women in the village, and that woman became a local goddess for the week that she wore the scarf. In the other village, named for the Ugurnams who lived there, there was a special loafer which granted any woman who wore it unending love from any of the suitors she chose, so long as he was from the Ugur village. Eventually, through an expansion of both villages, their small empires collided at a huge valley named Intrarar. New to the Tystists, the Ugurnams wore odd shoes modeled after the sacred icon. Also, when the Ugur-dwellers saw the strange scarves wrapped around most Tystists' neck, they were in awe. Soon, after speaking amongst themselves and mostly agreeing, the two factions decided to hate each other. Given this present hate, war erupted, and it was named the Moral War. After eight years of brutal fighting, the Tystists emerged victorious from the war. The only thing was that there was only one Tystist left, and he, bloody and vicious-looking, lay on the ground with no arms and no legs, and yelled,

"I R BETTER THAN u BECAusSE YOU R TEH LOSER U DIE HAHAHAHAHA!"

 

[jim66bbc]

Oh, the pain of the outcasts is insufferable!

I hate fetish-mongerers who insist their fetish is more appropriate than others.

One time, a long long time ago, there were two people. Both were cursed by their makers to be obsessed with a solitary item. For the Tystists this was a large green scarf that was passed around to the women in the village, and that woman became a local goddess for the week that she wore the scarf. In the other village, named for the Ugurnams who lived there, there was a special loafer which granted any woman who wore it unending love from any of the suitors she chose, so long as he was from the Ugur village. Eventually, through an expansion of both villages, their small empires collided at a huge valley named Intrarar. New to the Tystists, the Ugurnams wore odd shoes modeled after the sacred icon. Also, when the Ugur-dwellers saw the strange scarves wrapped around most Tystists' neck, they were in awe. Soon, after speaking amongst themselves and mostly agreeing, the two factions decided to hate each other. Given this present hate, war erupted, and it was named the Moral War. After eight years of brutal fighting, the Tystists emerged victorious from the war. The only thing was that there was only one Tystist left, and he, bloody and vicious-looking, lay on the ground with no arms and no legs, and yelled,

"I R BETTER THAN u BECAusSE YOU R TEH LOSER U DIE HAHAHAHAHA!"

I don't think this is a case of one fetish being more appropreate than others. This is a case of time and place. Taking advantage of tired people in an ICU is just that, taking advantage of people. From a person who is supose to insure their safty. Not only that the person brags about it and encourages others to do the same. Not to mention he damaged a visitors clothing. Thats disrespectful, illeagel and just wrong.

 

[TicklingisLife6]

amen jim

 

[skev4]

I don't think this is a case of one fetish being more appropreate than others. This is a case of time and place. Taking advantage of tired people in an ICU is just that, taking advantage of people. From a person who is supose to insure their safty. Not only that the person brags about it and encourages others to do the same. Not to mention he damaged a visitors clothing. Thats disrespectful, illeagel and just wrong.

Not to mention that this is the story section, where one should be free to tell stories. Whether this original poster performed the action in question or not is irrelevant, I in fact think that he did not, as much as he might try to convince me otherwise. The dumbby moral battle that so many constituents of this forum concern themselves with is predictable nonsense: someone posts a questionable piece of media (in this case, a story), someone complains, someone talks about how bad things are, blah blah blah. We have no problem with women being forced to endure what they do not wish to, but if someone has an odd fantasy that involves taking advantage of a woman in another way, we get all up in arms about it.

Fact of this particular matter is, he posted a little story for the benefit of himself and others around him. Thus we have the point of this whole forum: to release feelings which we restrain in public, and take part in enjoying the feelings that others are releasing. Must you assault him with such "taking advantage of her" oohs and aahs when he merely wishes to benefit those around him? So you don't like the story. Move along then, and don't discourage him from telling his stories. An online forum is no place to threaten blah blah blah legal action and question others' values: the integrity of all information presented as fact is impossible to read into. For all you know you have (once again, as has been done with other first-time posters and mature picture posters) ostracized one of your fellow outcasts from the normalcy of society, and caused a great misdeed to the internet tickling community. Perhaps someone could have benefited from this original poster's story, and future stories (again, whether they are true or merely stylized, fantasized versions of almost-incidents of recent memory), but instead you decided to purge that person's outlier ideas from the tickling community. Why don't we just purge all deviance anyways: we don't need tickling, or oral sex, or foot fetishes; we can all just have boring procreative sex intended not for pleasure and void out one of the last remaining sources of bliss in the world.

Good idea. Kill all the deviance. Actually, let's take anyone who doesn't look normal and kill them. And all the children. Kill them too, so they don't grow up to be abnormal and different. Slaughter the teenagers so they do not become stuck in rebellion. Then we've got 1984ish Nazi 60 year olds who can't enjoy anything and pull a lever all day to generate nothing but the single light bulb above each one of their heads.

This forum is stupid tinder in the rain.

 

[a1532b]

Well, Hlidskajalf, take your own advice then. If you don't like it, move along then. There is quite a large difference between telling stories about how you tickled your spouse and how you sexually assaulted a sleeping woman in the ICU! Society has it's own set of moral standards, and when someone violates those standards debates like this sprout. From the looks of this thread, the majority of the people here frown upon his actions. Everyone has stated their opinion here and nobody's opinion is going to change anyone elses. Especially posts like yours that call everyone stupid and use hyperbole in great extent to compare everyone to nazi's just because most people don't see the same way as you.

By the way, what is the difference between stupid tinder and regular tinder?

 

[Dragon321]

i'm afraid i both agree and disagree: i recognize that Hlidskdyalf has a valid point about hypocrisy on this forum (perhaps that is too strong a word): you came down like a ton of bricks upon this first time poster, and not with any kind of constructive criticism to reason out why his actions were wrong but rather with a stupidly thought out knee jerk reaction of "you're fucked dude" or, "you're sick". way to go people, way to go. on the other hand no one seems to be complaining about the enormous number of NC or 'non-consensual' tickling posts on this forum. i am personally against both what the guy originally posted and also all of this non-consensual tickling: i feel that it is a violation of a female (or male)'s personal rights. i am purely a consensual tickler. i dont doubt that i enjoy bondage etc. but it is an important part that the woman in question consent. this i believe is the ultimate inviolable boundary that distinguishes sexual practices, and what makes paedophilia wrong as opposed to merely another sexual practice. hey, i love tickling, but for me it needs to be with the consent of a friend or loved one.

i also disagree with H-skalf's opinion of the forum's purpose as a mere release of tension: surely that is part of it, but nonetheless, do we have a duty to promote acceptable activities? personally, i have to say i disagree with what you did. perhaps it reflects negatively on you as a person, i dont know and dont care, and i have no quarrel with you other than asserting that i would not have done the same had i been in your position. i do however think you were justified in retorting, although perhaps in a more reasoned form. let's cut the bad feeling here, shall we? i also apologize in case i have inadvertently added fuel to the fire.

 

[Licknticklefeet1]

I enjoyed the story. This is a story section. And I like the freedom for an author to "be bad" in a story.

When I go to the movies, We don't get all morally bent out of shape because someone gets shot, stabbed or blown-up. Likewise, just enjoy the stories and don't take them to be the gospel truth.

 

[trainmaster500]

but this does'nt appear to be a story.... from what I seem to gather he is a security guard actually conducting this act at a hospital ICU center.

Flecke:

Very little jealousy takes place in this forum. As a matter of fact we usually commend people on their tickling adventures with their wives, girlfriends etc ie- people who would normally consent to tickling or at least wouldn't be offended. In your case you are tickling people in and at an inappropriate place and time. You are tickling them while they are sleeping. You are tickling them while they are in ICU waiting for their loved ones to recover. The rest of the people who have responded to your story have morals and know right from wrong. When are you going to start?

 

[TicklingisLife6]

AussieMonkey: Just because I decided not to type out a paragraph of why I thought this story was wrong doesnt mean anything. I can express my views as I see fit and to be completely honest I was so taken back that thats all I could really say. So dont put yourself above people like we are inferior to you. Thats great that you can express yourself better, good for you.

 

[skev4]

a1532b, society's moral standards state that masturbating or obsessing over tickling is wrong. To "society" (which you oddly generalize as the first people who responded to this post), we are but freaks, be us on the lower end of the freakishness spectrum. Therefore, pointing to any moral values is worthless! You may begin to define the morals of the tickling society--which would be more in tune--but then you again begin to generalize the vastly different stylings of this odd little community.

Obviously your statements on society, in general, are correct. If I don't want to wear pants, but I want to fit in to a world which enforces pants, then I shall wear pants. However, trying to put restrictions on a world which does not, and should not, enforce anything of that nature is, in effect, morally wrong! By setting up morals, you defeat the no-moralism (according to the rest of society) of the tickling community.

Now, some righteous respect-gatherer may spout up and say, "I HAVE MORALS!" Have you Christian morals or elsewise, it is YOU whose morals exist, and your morals affect your interpersonal experiences with other people, and essentially what vague niche you allow yourself to fit into, in that time period of your life. However, the tickling community, and in large part the online tickling community, like most online "societies," which are generally shunned by the public for being "too weird," cannot be governed by morals which the ones who say "too weird" set. I don't care if you've "got morals" or if you "don't agree with this," and frankly, you're a detriment to this society if you wish everyone else to gulp down your morals about mature tickling, illegal tickling, or non-consensual tickling. Some people enjoy these things, and it is not your place to purge them from the society; they are just like you, insofar as they happened to slip through the fingers of conformism when they were developing, and as such are separated from the vast majority of people who have sex in the world, and they like tickling. For the sake of all involved, do not control them, and negatively influence them to only post material which you may enjoy. By streamlining the process (in effect, purging all aspects of tickling which you do not like), you sit us closer to the edge of non-existence or exclusiveness, two things which I'm sure a large majority of "tickling constants" (the "normal" ones who like consensual, free tickling) and "tickling deviants" (the ones who like the odd things about tickling) don't want to happen.

I'll no longer post. Stupid tinder is stupidity which draws flames, even amongst the intelligence of the rain.