Hi there, thought I'd chime in:
"As a whole, I just think there are better things to do than to waste time and energy dealing with hookers when they've managed to maintain their workforce for a couple thousand years...lol Seems it's just making it easier on the men who use them than making it better for the females."
I say make it easier for both. As long as it's still illegal, it's not a waste of time or energy to those involved. If they ever make filming tickling videos illegal you'll hear a bunch of us screaming across the globe, though many wouldn't care.
And trust me, it would make it easier for the females as well. I have several friends who are sex workers, called 'escorts' in these parts. I'm always amused when reading about how they 'had nothing else to turn to and had to do it for the money', since my friends have college degrees and other skills. They're sex workers primarily because they love sex with no strings attached, with the excellent pay being a lovely bonus. Their bodies belong to them, and as adults they shouldn't be penalized by the government for using those bodies to earn a living anymore than massage therapists or exotic dancers. One may question why I place massage in the same category as sex; yes I realize the big differences, but you're still using your physical skills to give another physical pleasure. Who cares whether you're rubbing a penis or shoulder to give ecstacy and satisfaction?
"Personally, I realy don't care. It just seems like the trade off of one set of problems for another wouldn't be worth all the trouble involved in legalizing it. *shrug*"
Again, it would be very worth it to those involved. I'd love for my friends to not have to worry about undercover cops and such, and just do what they love without that hanging over their heads.
"Tickle Hookers...lol Sounds like a Cinemax special! "Now, Mr. Jim, if you'll just walk with Candy to the last room on the right, your girl is just changing the sheets from the last customer. She'll be right with you. She's ticklish...a little on the used side, but ticklish."
Eeew! ICKY-ICKY! BLECH! Sorry, but I just can't get aroused at the thought of some slimy, multiple partner infested love chickie.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81adc/81adc88ed5c0116e13405467a64fedb5c7335a8c" alt="Disgust :disgust: :disgust:"
"
Unless you're a virgin we're ALL a little on the used side (g). The cure for sliminess is a simple shower and freshening-up between bouts, along with new sheets and such. Many folks out there have more than one sexual partner in their lives without being 'infested' with anything, and from what my sex-worker friends tell me they work hard at making each encounter special for each client; that includes everything being fresh and ready just for him. Since many people want sex without the relationship, I imagine that occasionally going to a sweet lady and getting exactly what you want in a pleasant setting can be just what they needed. And I see nothing wrong with being well paid for excellent service.
I've always been annoyed at intercourse and ejaculation being toted as the end-all be-all of sex; there is sooooo much more to it than that, depending on who you are. Seriously, if a foot-fetishist gets his most sexual satisfaction from his time with the little pedicurist he sees twice per month, should she go to prison? Of course not. But the woman who rubs other parts is a criminal. It's not right.
I suspect the reason we can get uncomfortable with this is because doing it for money seems to make it...pedestrian. Less special and intimate than we've been taught it should be. Personally I say it can be both, like the difference between a rubdown from your personal trainer and one from your spouse. Sex should be what YOU make it, not Washington.
Bella