Ms.Torture
Registered User
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2006
- Messages
- 4
- Points
- 0
CHECK IT OUT:
www.clips4sale.com/3683
www.clips4sale.com/3683
-
If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread -
Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year. -
The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us. -
>>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
Don't forget to include your username
The Most Severe Ballbusting Ever Caught On Film!
- Thread starter Ms.Torture
- Start date
Goodieluver
3rd Level Indigo Feather
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2003
- Messages
- 6,718
- Points
- 36
...how are men able to pee or live after all this?
Armpit_licker
TMF Master
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2004
- Messages
- 989
- Points
- 0
Quit spamming. This is a tickling forum.
maniactickler
Level of Ruby Feather
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2002
- Messages
- 23,141
- Points
- 48
Thats just wrong. 
thats so sick
who could possibly be turned on by that? squeezing someones balls, squeezing til they cry... squeezing til they come, 200 kicks, non stop abuse... thats SICK. they must have to pay the men in the videos a very LARGE salary... they probably need surgery after 1 of the clips.
who could possibly be turned on by that? squeezing someones balls, squeezing til they cry... squeezing til they come, 200 kicks, non stop abuse... thats SICK. they must have to pay the men in the videos a very LARGE salary... they probably need surgery after 1 of the clips.
method11236
TMF Master
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2002
- Messages
- 883
- Points
- 0
Maybe she thought TMF stood for Testicle Mashing Forum...
Meth
Meth
T
Tidas
Guest
yeah, seriously fuck off. We don't need this sort of tripe around here. Especially if some of the 'lees are getting ideas about when we umm 'don't hear' the safeword..... 
Interesting. Awful, painful, and... consenting, is he?
Yeah, (some of) you guys don't want the 'lees to get any ideas.... 🙄
and I agree, it IS quite "mean." And I don't understand how anyone can be turned on by this either....
However, a lot of you, not all, seem to have no problem whatsoever with WOMEN getting tortured to (and beyond) the screaming point, while bound helpless, exhibiting every sign of real distress in what I've seen pushed as non-consentual videos, and they do look & sound quite real to me
BUT the sight of one guy who's not bound, who very likely *paid $$$ for this session,
(rather than having gotten paid for something that turned out to be much worse than he expected,
which he could have run from, unlike those women in NC videos who're strapped in for hours? whether they like it, can stand it, or not....)
getting his nuts pummelled is too much for many of you.
For many veteran S&Mers, direct pain is more bearable than tickling.
Maybe next time the Macho Cheezeballs among you who laugh and snicker at a woman's agony will think about what the truly unbearable might be like in your terms.
Ya know, I don't think I've ever seen a MALE featured in non-consentual tickling videos, either.
Not that I'd like to see anyone in one, but that's interesting.
Please note: For those here who are not in the Cheesy category I apologize, kindly disregard my disgusted observation. This was not directed at those I quoted, either, as I have no idea if they're among the above-mentioned.
As for those of you who have no problem with the torture of women, however, I hear this particular dominatrix does have a few openings in her busy schedule, and is more than willing to accomodate the deserving few.... 😀
Yeah, (some of) you guys don't want the 'lees to get any ideas.... 🙄
and I agree, it IS quite "mean." And I don't understand how anyone can be turned on by this either....
However, a lot of you, not all, seem to have no problem whatsoever with WOMEN getting tortured to (and beyond) the screaming point, while bound helpless, exhibiting every sign of real distress in what I've seen pushed as non-consentual videos, and they do look & sound quite real to me
BUT the sight of one guy who's not bound, who very likely *paid $$$ for this session,
(rather than having gotten paid for something that turned out to be much worse than he expected,
which he could have run from, unlike those women in NC videos who're strapped in for hours? whether they like it, can stand it, or not....)
getting his nuts pummelled is too much for many of you.
For many veteran S&Mers, direct pain is more bearable than tickling.
Maybe next time the Macho Cheezeballs among you who laugh and snicker at a woman's agony will think about what the truly unbearable might be like in your terms.
Ya know, I don't think I've ever seen a MALE featured in non-consentual tickling videos, either.
Not that I'd like to see anyone in one, but that's interesting.
Please note: For those here who are not in the Cheesy category I apologize, kindly disregard my disgusted observation. This was not directed at those I quoted, either, as I have no idea if they're among the above-mentioned.
As for those of you who have no problem with the torture of women, however, I hear this particular dominatrix does have a few openings in her busy schedule, and is more than willing to accomodate the deserving few.... 😀
OBleedingMe
TMF Expert
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2001
- Messages
- 530
- Points
- 0
Oh Babbles... my dear Babbles, where do I start?
Your post is a complete contradiction in terms. You cannot support the maiming/mutilation of one gender and condone the maiming/mutilation of the other.
You seem to forget that NON-CONSENSUAL male genital mutilation is something we see every day in television and the media, usually perpetrated by the opposite sex. Women are taught through the media that mutilating a man's genital's, usually by beating it with a blunt object or kicking it, is perfectly a justifiable retaliation or punishment to met out against their male counterparts. It is displayed over and over again in the feminized media/culture as a completely justifiable act. In fact, I can recall a recent beer commercial where a group of women were actually fantasizing about mutilating a man's genitals in various ways - electrocution, blunt objects such as bats and metal clubs, and (of course) the "classic" kick to the genitals. I don't seem to recall any outrage over this commercial by females. Show me one instance in the mainstream media where mutilating or beating a woman's genital's is portrayed in a justifiable or comical light. Just one.
Can you imagine the outrage if there was a commerical that showed men fantasizing about beating a woman's vagina? I think we'd have Gloria Allred screeching her little head off about that one.
When it comes to the BDSM community (a community I have been a member of ever since I discovered my sexuality), there are very FEW truly non-con videos out there, and they're quite old. In today's climate of trigger-happy lawsuits, it would be foolhardy for any production company to create a truly non-con video. The lawsuit that would ensue would bankrupt them. No "pay off" at the end would deter the victim from suing. The proof is on tape and they'd take the company for everything they had. If you truly believe these "non-con" videos are what they say, you're a very gulliable person.
It's interesting that you mention femdom because when you compare the amount of femdom sites (female on male) to maledom sites (male on female), you can see a huge disparity. Femdom sites outnumber maledom sites almost 5 to 1. This ratio has increased due to the recent Obscenity Laws that have been put into effect. For instance, the maledom site www.insex.com has been forced to shut down and open up a much tamer version of itself called www.hardtied.com. Yet, it's sister femdom site www.insexm.com has remained untouched. Another example: on clips4sale.com, there are virtually NO maledom stores, yet there are literally HUNDREDS of femdom sites. Men being electrocuted, whipped, urinated on, and suffocated by women. Clips4sale.com's answer? They don't condone torture. In other words, men dominating women is considered wrong, but women dominating men is considered entertainment. That is sexist in every sense of the word.
I'm an Equalist. If women humilating/dominating men is acceptable, then men who humilate/dominate women is also acceptable. You can't condone one and not the other. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
I'm sure a Master or two could clear a spot in his busy schedule to accomodate those of your ilk... a few single-tails with your name on them. 😎
Your post is a complete contradiction in terms. You cannot support the maiming/mutilation of one gender and condone the maiming/mutilation of the other.
You seem to forget that NON-CONSENSUAL male genital mutilation is something we see every day in television and the media, usually perpetrated by the opposite sex. Women are taught through the media that mutilating a man's genital's, usually by beating it with a blunt object or kicking it, is perfectly a justifiable retaliation or punishment to met out against their male counterparts. It is displayed over and over again in the feminized media/culture as a completely justifiable act. In fact, I can recall a recent beer commercial where a group of women were actually fantasizing about mutilating a man's genitals in various ways - electrocution, blunt objects such as bats and metal clubs, and (of course) the "classic" kick to the genitals. I don't seem to recall any outrage over this commercial by females. Show me one instance in the mainstream media where mutilating or beating a woman's genital's is portrayed in a justifiable or comical light. Just one.
Can you imagine the outrage if there was a commerical that showed men fantasizing about beating a woman's vagina? I think we'd have Gloria Allred screeching her little head off about that one.
When it comes to the BDSM community (a community I have been a member of ever since I discovered my sexuality), there are very FEW truly non-con videos out there, and they're quite old. In today's climate of trigger-happy lawsuits, it would be foolhardy for any production company to create a truly non-con video. The lawsuit that would ensue would bankrupt them. No "pay off" at the end would deter the victim from suing. The proof is on tape and they'd take the company for everything they had. If you truly believe these "non-con" videos are what they say, you're a very gulliable person.
It's interesting that you mention femdom because when you compare the amount of femdom sites (female on male) to maledom sites (male on female), you can see a huge disparity. Femdom sites outnumber maledom sites almost 5 to 1. This ratio has increased due to the recent Obscenity Laws that have been put into effect. For instance, the maledom site www.insex.com has been forced to shut down and open up a much tamer version of itself called www.hardtied.com. Yet, it's sister femdom site www.insexm.com has remained untouched. Another example: on clips4sale.com, there are virtually NO maledom stores, yet there are literally HUNDREDS of femdom sites. Men being electrocuted, whipped, urinated on, and suffocated by women. Clips4sale.com's answer? They don't condone torture. In other words, men dominating women is considered wrong, but women dominating men is considered entertainment. That is sexist in every sense of the word.
I'm an Equalist. If women humilating/dominating men is acceptable, then men who humilate/dominate women is also acceptable. You can't condone one and not the other. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
I'm sure a Master or two could clear a spot in his busy schedule to accomodate those of your ilk... a few single-tails with your name on them. 😎
Start by reading my post.
That would be a good beginning.
I make it very clear, if you read it at all, I don't support this, except for the jerks who get off torturing women (non-consenting, and restrained). And there are a lot of them in any of the BDSM spheres. The non-consensual stuff here is all aimed at women, if I'm not mistaken.
This guy was consenting, and even then I stated I didn't like it at all.
So I'm afraid your response makes no sense following mine.
Except to illustrate that, once again, SOME guys only see discomfort from their own perspective, and no one else's.
That would be a good beginning.
I make it very clear, if you read it at all, I don't support this, except for the jerks who get off torturing women (non-consenting, and restrained). And there are a lot of them in any of the BDSM spheres. The non-consensual stuff here is all aimed at women, if I'm not mistaken.
This guy was consenting, and even then I stated I didn't like it at all.
So I'm afraid your response makes no sense following mine.
Except to illustrate that, once again, SOME guys only see discomfort from their own perspective, and no one else's.
OBleedingMe
TMF Expert
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2001
- Messages
- 530
- Points
- 0
My psot makes perfect sense.
You seem to disregard (or refuse to acknowledge) the fact that there are plenty of WOMEN in the BDSM community who enjoy torturing or otherwise harming men, whether the video or story be consensual or non-consensual.
You seem to disregard (or refuse to acknowledge) the fact that there are plenty of WOMEN in the BDSM community who enjoy torturing or otherwise harming men, whether the video or story be consensual or non-consensual.
Babbles said:
That is a BIG assumption. We don't know the story behind this, the fact that it is on clips for sale dosen't mean this guy is either an actor or is not being coerced into this. The only thing that makes me feel it might be a fake, is the total absence of vomit in the pictures (and if you have ever been caught there you know what I am talking about).
I do agree overall with Babbles point though (and something we should never forget) Tickling is excruciating and miserable for a lot of people (think: nausea, asthma, loss of bladder control, panic attack, painful muscle spasms). So non-consensual tickling is no better than this tripe.
