The Owners of YouTube are really gay.

[footickler]

Ladies & Gentlemen It's Official. The Owners of YouTube are really gay. I dont know if anyone has noticed, But it seems to me like any tickling clips that pop up on YouTube involving females being tickled get deleted almost immediatly. Meanwhile Vids involving these jockguys seem to live on YouTube rent free. Its a disgrace to folks that arent into male on male tickling. I do feel bad kinda by singling out M/M tickling, But I feel something should be said. Its not fair.

 

[Kalamos]

And you created a thread to say this? 😉
It's old story already over TMF.

Dunno if they condone M/M clips as a "personal" preference.
Maybe they remove */F stuff, because it smells like porn to them.

I seriously doubt they even pause to check what ppl post.
It is more likely they got some spider script, checking site referrals, and removing clips linked by adult forums.

...

I know Youtube is easy and all, but quality is really too low.
If you really love Youtube, you should try Porntube.

 

[Camel26]

So...are you saying the owners of YouTube are "gay" in the sense that they are sexually attracted to members of their own gender? Or are you saying they are "gay" to replace a myriad of other derrogatory terms?

Wow...must be blissful...

 

[Kalamos]

So...are you saying the owners of YouTube are "gay" in the sense that they are sexually attracted to members of their own gender?

In this particular case, myth is: Youtube staff has a thing for M/M clips.
Over TMF they've been arguing for months about this stuff.
Apparently, YT mods keep removing F/F tk clips, while leaving unscathed M/M and kids clips.

...

Dunno what is fact and what is drunken-driven chat.
They sure try and remove anything that smells like a copyrighted clip.

What makes tough figuring them out is, they seem to put no rhyme or reason in removing clips.
I think we are not being picked upon as tk fans, cause foot fans are suffering the same fate.

We are just more aware, because they are removing stuff we are interested in.

...

🙂

 

[MistressValerie1]

It seems that YouTube welcomes M/M erotica but deems anything involving a female as being "pornographic." Several OCMB members have reported that M/M trampling clips are allowed to stay but F/M clips are deleted as soon as they are posted. Even clips of females crushing inanimate objects have been removed from YouTube for supposed TOS violations.

I urge all forum members to use adult-friendly file hosts like the one Kalamos recommended, to reduce the likelihood of deletion.

 

[Kalamos]

I should add, Myspace apparently has similar policies, towards different gender clips.

M/M, M/F, F/F, kids, they are all mixed up.
And since they must turn a blind eye over fringe adult contents, I doubt they'll get them sorted out, ever.

...

Porntube is nowhere as user friendly as YT is, but at least, they provide gender filters, and are much less likely to remove tickling clips as questionable.
Sure, you get exposed to vanilla porn contents, but I guess it better like that.

I mean, I can stand just so many teen tickling clips, before throwing up.

😉

...

Which reminds me...

* Passes a Cure Light Wounds potion over to Miss Val. *

 

[MistressValerie1]

* Passes a Cure Light Wounds potion over to Miss Val. *

Thank you, Kal. I have a horrendous flu and have been subsisting on green tea and vitamin C tablets for the last two days :unwell:

 

[FeatherDaemon1]

[DMG Mode] Ay Kalamos, a Cure Light Wounds won't heal a cold. It'll just heal 1d8+1 points of damage. Great, if say, Mistress Val rolled a 1 accidentally whacked herself with her own whip for 2 points of damage. It won't do a lick for statloss. She needs a Cure Disease potion.
[/DMG Mode]

Sorry about that... couldn't be helped. :]

 

[Kalamos]

[DMG Mode] Ay Kalamos, a Cure Light Wounds won't heal a cold. It'll just heal 1d8+1 points of damage. Great, if say, Mistress Val rolled a 1 accidentally whacked herself with her own whip for 2 points of damage. It won't do a lick for statloss. She needs a Cure Disease potion.
[/DMG Mode]

Sorry about that... couldn't be helped. :]

I kind of expected something like that.
What if, by sheer chance, I were trying to poison Miss Val, by swindling her the wrong potion, and cause a Cure Wounds overdose, eh? 😉

You meddling kids! You'll never get me! Ah!

 

[Paper#Boy]

Dunno what is fact and what is drunken-driven chat.
They sure try and remove anything that smells like a copyrighted clip.

Have you actually tried doing a search on there yourself ? it will become obvious as soon as you do that a bias exists on YT, you will find that 75% of the clips are gay/gay tickling clips that seem to constantly be at the top of searches.

But something regardless taste everyone here should concern themselves about is that there are many underage footfetish/tickling clips that seem to constantly be on there. These clips seem to be from kids tv programs as well so even if they are so dense as to believe all these clips of kids were just innocently posted they are still most likely copyrighted material.

I used to believe that maybe someone was flagging all the female footfetish/tickling clips purposely and youtube were just responding to that, but i have tried to flag the underage clips as inappropriate and they are still there now ! 😡 ...

maybe an email to there admins would be more persuasive 😡 ....

 

[Kalamos]

Have you actually tried doing a search on there yourself ?
it will become obvious as soon as you do that a bias exists on YT, you will find that 75% of the clips are gay/gay tickling clips that seem to constantly be at the top of searches.

Spare me the lecture? Please? 😉

Now, I don't mind gay clips too much.
I do find them distracting, though: YT staff should really find a way to filter contents out.
But for some reason, they are being hypocrites about it, so they can turn a blind eye over forbidden contents.

And this leads me to point two...

I used to believe that maybe someone was flagging all the female footfetish/tickling clips purposely and youtube were just responding to that, but i have tried to flag the underage clips as inappropriate and they are still there now ! 😡 ...
maybe an email to there admins would be more persuasive 😡 ....

Now, this is a real issue.
And you have my support on that.

Underage contents are a problem.
I don't mind mainstream shows too much. After all, YT is supposed to be family, so we could accept ppl to post stuff from family shows.

I have a prob with teens.
And I don't know how to deal with it.

...

The underlying problem is, fetishes are para-sexual interests.
Feet are not sexual in themselves: they are hot to foot fans.
Same with tickling, bellies, and so on.
And this means that safe family vids can become hot stuff for a niche audience - that is, us.

YT, Google vids, and so on, should become more fetish aware, and allow ppl to brand *how* a particular vid is unsuitable for other users.
Allow for real self-policing.

But they should first admit they are accepting questionable contents in the first place, and trust users with more power than a silly "questionable contents" flag.

...

I would suggest stopping with this "YT is for gays" stuff, because you only come off as homophobes, without getting to the heart of the prob, kid clips.

Just my thought.

 

[Camel26]

Seriously...saying things in the manner in which you've posted, especially the title, which you should feel free to change immediately, COMPLETELY detracts from the real issue here...

If you're pissed about there not being enough female lees in clips on you tube, feel free to spank somewhere else...but don't get ignorant over it...and feel free to not use the word "gay" as some awful slur...seriously...

If your issue is with kiddie porn, rant about that, and don't blame gay people for any of it...

Seriously...

 

[Kalamos]

Seriously...saying things in the manner in which you've posted, especially the title, which you should feel free to change immediately, COMPLETELY detracts from the real issue here...

Camel, sweetest hon, the way you quoted me, makes it look like I am the bad guy here. 😉

:leaf:

 

[FT Genikit]

No offence, but I'm starting to think that all foot fan - like me - are begining to dislike YT more and more. However, I could be wrong.

 

[Kalamos]

No offence, but I'm starting to think that all foot fan - like me - are begining to dislike YT more and more. However, I could be wrong.

Dunno. YT is not meant to be a foot site. It is not patterned after our tastes.
We cannot expect it to be.

And it is not like they are taking away something we are rightfully entitled to.
We are getting to watch vids we would not normally have ready access to.
It is like getting free colas, and complaining because they forgot the straw.

...

I am not saying that YT is perfect. Far from it. And the kid thing bugs me.

But, really, when ppl complain because it is - as they claim - gay-aligned, it is nonsense to me.
And even if it were the truth, I would not give a damn about it.

To me, ppl, any ppl, gay or not, are potential customers for my drawings.
Pecunia non olet.
And I would be a bad businessman if I were to insult ppl just because they have different preferences than I have.

😉

 

[FT Genikit]

Dunno. YT is not meant to be a foot site. It is not patterned after our tastes.
We cannot expect it to be.

And it is not like they are taking away something we are rightfully entitled to.
We are getting to watch vids we would not normally have ready access to.
It is like getting free colas, and complaining because they forgot the straw.

...

I am not saying that YT is perfect. Far from it. And the kid thing bugs me.

But, really, when ppl complain because it is - as they claim - gay-aligned, it is nonsense to me.
And even if it were the truth, I would not give a damn about it.

To me, ppl, any ppl, gay or not, are potential customers for my drawings.
Pecunia non olet.
And I would be a bad businessman if I were to insult ppl just because they have different preferences than I have.

😉

You're right. YT is not really a foot site, and you're also right about YT not being perfect (and I admit the truth). In fact nothing is perfect around here.

It's just that...well....

 

[Paper#Boy]

Spare me the lecture?

lecture ?? no lecture more like sarcasm as i assumed you actually already knew all that 😉🙂 ...

I don't mind mainstream shows too much.

agree trouble is that there are people on there who have accounts with collections containing only kids getting tickled taken from mainstream tv programs. One clip i tried to flag because the keywords were very suspect and it had an unsuitable content warning on it ! and bear in mind this was meant to be for a kids tv show depicting a kid being tickled, so if that doesn't demonstrate that users motives ! 😡

but i see your point about family shows because that is what a lot of people on there will post perfectly innocently, i just think people like i mentioned above can take advantage of that fact. 😡

I would suggest stopping with this "YT is for gays" stuff, because you only come off as homophobes, without getting to the heart of the prob, kid clips.

Just my thought.

I don't think it's a case of YT is gay ! what all of them ?? :umm: ... no i think it' a case of YT being way to PC with it's content policing by ignoring gay clips and taking out straight content. 🙄

If your issue is with kiddie porn, rant about that, and don't blame gay people for any of it...

well since i brought up that issue i guess you mean me ? when did i blame gay people for it ? 🙄

 

[Tickle4444]

I do dislike how tickling and feet have become so sexualized. I have my own personal issues with YouTube - but I don't complain, since I get to see a lot of Michael J Fox clips there. Even though I do like feet tickling, I wouldn't say that it's my main interest. I write lots of fanfic stories for Back to the Future, and most of them don't involve tickling.

 

[Big_Dogg85]

Let's just say that Youtube sucks for removing clips of ladies receiving the "divine treatment", end of discussion!!!

 

[Kalamos]

In fact nothing is perfect around here.
It's just that...well....

Come on, I am the only one that gets to be nihilistic around here.
You must have a positive outlook about it: consider what you've gained, not what you've lost.

Remember when ppl had to smuggle pics over geocities accounts?
Pics. Not even vids.

but i see your point about family shows because that is what a lot of people on there will post perfectly innocently, i just think people like i mentioned above can take advantage of that fact. 😡

Well, we are taking advantage too, under our own fashion, of shows with tickling or foot scenes.
Point is: we should not need to.
We all, users and YT staff, should be so mature as to realise that some vids have a "double value", as vanilla shows, and fetish scenes.
And come up with something smarter than plain removal or "inappropriate" flags.

I am not optimistic about it, though.
We would need somebody that understands what fetishes are all about.
Somebody so keen-minded as to see dubious intentions behind apparently innocent vids, and yet so open-minded to know that most fetish vids are not harmful or evil.
First problem is: we should stop watching and sharing grey-zone vids.
I mean, vids with 15 yo teens, copyrighted clips, and so on.

Unless we can be 100% honest abour our intentions, we can't expect them to be 100% honest with vid removal.

I don't think it's a case of YT is gay ! what all of them ?? :umm: ... no i think it' a case of YT being way to PC with it's content policing by ignoring gay clips and taking out straight content. 🙄

...

well since i brought up that issue i guess you mean me ? when did i blame gay people for it ? 🙄

This wasn't aimed at you, specifically. I typed "homophobes", after all. 🙂
And you're quoting Camel, so I cannot really reply on her behalf.

...

Now, what I am upset over are kid vids.
I stumbled upon an older brother slapping his younger sister for "fun", and she was in tears.
I felt like punching straight through my screen.
All I could do was reporting the vid, but they had nothing that resembled what I found wrong in it.
Generical copyright issues, adult scene. Nothing about, "he is a moron, doing something idiotic, somebody please kick his demented bum".

And so much for self-policing too: some of the comments were enthusiastic about him mauling a 5 yo...

Frankly speaking, I'm starting to think we, as fetishists, should steer clear of YT, before *we* get a bad rep just hanging around it.
We are not lacking, for liking some spice in our lives.
They are, for giving morons a tool they are misusing.

 

[MistressValerie1]

According to its TOS, YT was never intended for sharing fetish or erotic materials, so it should be no surprise that it fails miserably as a fetish file host.

...and feel free to not use the word "gay" as some awful slur...seriously...

Based on the context of the discussion, I believe the thread starter meant the term literally, not as a pejorative. I agree, however, that a different choice of wording would have been more tactful.

 

[Cbarton]

Maybe I'm thinking waaaay to logically (that has been known to get me in trouble a time or two)...and I'm in no way defending YT's policies...but has anyone considered the obvious alternative reason for the male erotica staying on YT and not the female is because perhaps straight WOMEN maybe making the decisions? The hypocrisy may be in the direction of women 'censors' knowing what they like to see...

It's a wild idea, but makes sense on a pure logical standpoint.

 

[OriamRepus1]

In this particular case, myth is: Youtube staff has a thing for M/M clips.
🙂

What if the YouTube staff had women in it? Are they still gay? :leaf:

It's a mystery why stuff like this gets deleted while some crap featuring teenage sluts stripping stays on. It's really up to what people flag. That's what really gets the staff's attention. I doubt they go so deep as to venture into the tickling videos to find something to delete.

 

[baubaloo]

I had a bunch of my vids on there and they took every last one of them off. Then killed my account... I think youtube has some serious issues... It's cool, their loss...

Bobaloo

 

[Kalamos]

What if the YouTube staff had women in it? Are they still gay? :leaf:

Dunno. This is not my thread, I'm just relating myth as it is being told. 🙂

I could as well rephrase it as: "they say that YT staff is made up by straight women who kill female erotica".
Personally, I don't buy either explanation.
They could be gay males, straight females, asexual apes, multisexual aliens.

Point is: I see little rhyme or reason in how they remove stuff.
And they might get in trouble for that.
They can't remove just *some* vids from the same genre, while leaving other vids behind: ppl are bound to complain.

...

YT is just a tool. It works for me, I'll keep at it.
It works no more, I look elsewhere.

For instance, for toons YT is good enough for me.
Funny thing is, posting complete tv series happens to be illegal, so they risk fines and closure, unless they do something fast...
Killing fetish erotica should be the least of their concerns.

Yet... some ppl are weird: while illegal, keeping whole toons seems harmless; on the other hand allowing fetish erotica could be branded as immoral, even if vids themselves are not commercial, or if the producer itself is posting them as ad stuff.

And what about that brazilian celeb suing YT for allowing a sexual vid of hers?