An Echo to qjakal's "Oh no...not again!"
Thank you, qjakal!
And I WHOLEHEARTEDLY agree, as most of you probably surmized I would! Beside the "Russian Novel of yore...," initiated by someone who was once considered a dear friend to this forum and ergo, the community-at-large (hint...hint...hint...*forced smile*)to whom qjakal's post in this thread refers, I have some thoughts and amplifications of My own I so bravely offered more recently. Those thoughts and reflections can be found at this
Giving up tickling for lent link. My post is can be found as the third down in that thread.
I would generally agree with the amplifications offered about tickling one's significant other, in a communal setting, as Tickling Duo and drummer_punk have so bravely, yet thoughfully, offered on this thread. The exception being, perhaps, (for ONE example, I am confident this forum could relate MANY others and that would be welcome here)when My tickle companion jen and I mutually agree to tickle with "select" other singles and couples in a more intimate setting. I CANNOT amplify ENOUGH, how important it is to include ALL parties at ALL phases of the CRITCAL pre-scene negotiation that SHOULD ALWAYS precede tickling in such an intimate, but communal setting! COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE, COMMUNICATE! And respect each other's moral values in that process. If you proceed as intelligent, respectful, courteous, and thoughful adults, the quality of tickle play shall be revered by ALL involved and will, GENERALLY, be high.
Nuff said, I yield to the rest of this fine forum!
*GuitarPeteTklr shreds his way into tickling oblivion*
Hackneyed, but useful, quote of the day: " I REFUSE to have a battle of wits with an UNARMED person..."