• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

UK student auctions her virginity on the internet.

BigJim1

TMF Expert
Joined
Oct 10, 2002
Messages
390
Points
0
One of the tabloids reported this rather shocking story yesterday, and today the girl herself was interviewed on Richard & Judy. (A married couple who present a tea-time talkshow over here in the UK.) Here is the low-down for those of you who aren't familiar with the details...

This girl is a university student who is gradually sinking into an ever deepening mire of debt. Her student loan (grants being a thing of the past) barely covers her rent and tuition fees. She works for a waitressing agency afor the princely sum of £4.50 an hour (roughly $6.00) for little things like food and clothing; all the while studying full time for her degree. As her debt mounts she has put her VIRGINITY up for sale on an internet auction site. The sum she's specified is £10,000 (around $16,000), which won't clear all of her debts by the end of her course, but will eat a significant chunk of them.

Before I go on, I should mention this: in America you are used to paying six figure sums for a university education, but over here, the situation is somewhat different. American tax-payers pay about a third of what the British public does and a significant amount of this tax is spent (allegedly) on the funding of higher education for all those with the capability to go for it. The tax system in the USA is vastly different, with parents getting much larger tax breaks on investments in future education over a number of years. Here is is normal to consider that education should be paid for mostly by the state, and just how much a student has to pay back is worked out from the income of their family.

Now this is the point that sticks in my craw...
This girl's parents are both professionals. One is something like a registrar or a surgeon, a job that attracts a salary of between £55,000 and £80,000 ($70,000-$100,000); the other is senior admin, grossing over £30,000 per annum. (Around $45,000.) This caring pair decided in their wisdom that they had no moral obligation to help her through her education once she reached the age of 18, as her support was no longer their legal concern.

I'm not a parent yet, but my personal opinion is that these cretinous bastards should be hanging their heads in shame!:angry: :angry: :angry: When I eventually become a parent, I'd like to think that giving them assistance through college would be something high on my list of priorities. Legally becoming an adult wouldn't free me of my desire to help them achieve a decent education, nor would it prevent them from taking charge of their own life and becoming a responsible young man or woman.

Quite frankly I don't believe these two deserve the priviledge of parenthood and I think they are the worst kind of hard-hearted scum imaginable. I can't imagine anyone who'd rather see their young daughter driven to prostitution to solve their debt crisis, rather then help them out when they both have such high-paid jobs. To make matters worse this girl is actually a lesbian, which puts paid to any theories about her doing what comes naturally for money.

I'm all for teaching your children the value of self-reliance and responsibility, but is helping your daughter through her education really a gross deriliction of parental duty? Is it even that unusual? I've never heard of parents who didn't help out in some way, even if they couldn't afford to financially support their kids. That this pair could afford to send half a dozen children through education makes this even worse. They basically are the most hard-hearted pair of shits I've ever heard of.

Richard & Judy looked gobsmacked at the thought of parents being so utterly uncharitable and I must say, I can't blame them!

Remember this too: just how much a student has to pay is worked out from the income of their family. This girl will cop for the highest bracket of tuition and top-up fees (when they become legal, as they surely will in the next few days) because her parents are such high earners. But because the scum-sucking sacks of worm excrement have cut her off without a penny, she'll be responsible for the lot! where, pray tell, is the reasonableness in that?
 
Last edited:
More so than her scum parents, perhaps this is also a damning indictment of a sucession of governments who have butchered a fine education system to the point where it can't stand upright.
 
... Oh well... it seems barely believable to me.

But I'm a doubting Thomas most of the time.

...

Reg's!
 
Kalamos said:
... Oh well... it seems barely believable to me.

But I'm a doubting Thomas most of the time.

...

Reg's!


I know exactly what you mean, it beggars belief doesn't it? If it had only been in the tabloids then I'd maybe feel more skeptical, but it seems to be for real.
 
I'd say she had better to start off a family on her own... And get fees calculated on a lower monetary gain.

...

Dunno if it is possible at all, in UK.
Sure, ppl are weird.
 
If that is true......all I can say is that the parents are scumbags. I am with you 100%, teaching self reliance is one thing, but this is more like dereliction of parental duty.
 
HisDivineShadow said:
If that is true......all I can say is that the parents are scumbags. I am with you 100%, teaching self reliance is one thing, but this is more like dereliction of parental duty.



I agree mate. I did hear Neutron say that he'd called a "friend in England" and this friend's opinion was that it was a stunt to give publicity to the anti-Blair/anti- top up fees camp. I do find that reasonably plausible, but have to wonder just what exactly makes this friend of his so infallible.
 
It could be Newt spouting again, which we love him dearly for, but I can never tell. Even if it IS false, I'll bet it's happened to some poor British girl out there.
 
Blair is a ridiculous mofo; wasn't he the PM for the LABOUR party??? As far as I know, labourparty doesn't mean conservative bitchassed lame asshole party... 🙄
 
HisDivineShadow said:
It could be Newt spouting again, which we love him dearly for, but I can never tell. Even if it IS false, I'll bet it's happened to some poor British girl out there.

You don't have to bet, it's a certainty. Several of my friends who work in Southampton know full well that a few of the girls who go to Southampton Uni are working as escorts to cover the astronomical bills. Thankfully they're sensible enough to be discreet about things, so they get left alone to work their lives out as best as a fucked up government can let them. Quite frankly, who but a total arse-bandit of a wanker would want to arrest a girl who's just trying to cope with college? :sigh:
 
SadisticTickler said:
Blair is a ridiculous mofo; wasn't he the PM for the LABOUR party??? As far as I know, labourparty doesn't mean conservative bitchassed lame asshole party... 🙄


It never used to mean that, but apparently it does now. I'm not a socialist and never will be, but it's necessary for some socialist thinking to creep into government to balance the effect of the tories. What we needed was a Labour Party leader who gave a shit about the poor, rundown bastards of the country; not a male Margaret Thatcher without fewer testicles and far less courage. :sigh: :sigh: :sigh:
 
I can think of many, sadly. The thing that makes me a wee bit ticked off is that if the people who made the laws that force these students to sell themselves were in the same position, you can bet your life the laws would change faster than Bush can make up a new word.
 
squirmer30 said:
I hope to God that one day Blair is forced to sell his arse for £16,000. I for one would take savage delight in making sure the bastard paid income tax on it as well.


I think he already sold it to Gordon Brown for a second term in office. 😀

You a Brit Squirmer?
 
squirmer30 said:
I hope to God that one day Blair is forced to sell his arse for £16,000. I for one would take savage delight in making sure the bastard paid income tax on it as well.


Don't get me wrong, I don't morally disapprove of prostitution. But I do believe that it takes a special kind of mindset to deal with the implications of selling your body for money. I DO NOT believe that students should be made so desperate by such an uncaring and unfair system that some be forced to resort to it to pay their bills.
 
squirmer30 said:
Absolutely. I'm with you there Jim. I just loathe and despise everything this "Labour" government stand for, and would enjoy seeing Blair or indeed any of his mates humiliated.(But I have felt that way about the government since long before Blair was in it) This vote tonight shows what a shower of faeces they all are. But then again, who ever heard of politicians voting with their consciences ?
And a pound says that the Hutton report won't have anything bad to say about President Blair.


A single quid? I'd bet my pension on it! Hutton's a gutless turd, like all the rest.

I assume from your comments that the bill allowing top up fees was passed then?
 
Last edited:
All I have to say is that I feel so sorry for the girl, and I will pray for her and hope that she gets her education. I have to count my blessings and realize that I'm not struggling as much as I think I am. I have help (financially) from just about every family member in my family. If I could help this girl financially, I certainlly would!!


HANG IN THERE GIRL!!!
 
nessonite said:
Unfortunately the boy is indeed guilty of this.
Bahh!

Guilty Ness? You make it sound like a bad thing. I'll have you know that the most depraved and sadistic torturers of history were mostly English! 😀 I certainly don't break the mould. *sprouts horns*
 
What's New

11/10/2024
There will be Trivia in our Chat Room this Sunday evening at 11PM EST. Join us!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** Jojo45 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top