Wall$treet Pic$

[WallStreet]

It's been a while since I've posted new pic$ to my Yahoo group. I have just added some new photos today. I recently did new shoots with Playboy model Mandy, as well as the gorgeous Nicole, who was recently featured in the June edition of TickleTown. This was the second time I have worked with each beauty.
There are 15 new pic$ of Mandy, and 7 of Nicole.
3 of the Mandy pic$ are foot tickling, and 2 are underarm tickling (I poke her with the handle of my feather duster.
As far as the Mandy pic$ go, these are not the old pics where my feeble photography skills failed to capture her true beauty
These are NEW pics where my feeble photography skills have once again failed to capture her true beauty. In the armpit shots you get a good look at what her face really looks like. She strongly resembles actress Gina Gershon, and I am very pissed at myself that I have once again managed to screw things up. But don't worry, because only the poses came out a bit blurry. The tickling shots are on the money.
As for Nicole, there are 4 pics where I tickle her feet with a toothbrush (excellent buttocks angles included), and one shot where I use the feathers on her gorgeous ass.

This link should work.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wallstreettickling/
If it doesn't work, click on the link on my profile page.

Feel free to post comments on my message board. I hope you all enjoy.

 

[Traveler]

Excellent,stuff,those are great pics.I really liked the old feather on the ass.I think she probably liked it to 😉 😉 Thanks for the picx

Ever wonder how many celebrities read the stuff posted here

 

[WallStreet]

Traveler-- Actually, she did like it. I've never met a woman who didn't enjoy getting her ass feather dusted. I usually pull the skin tight and tickle the bikini line. That always gets a great reaction.

I've got to improve the quality of my photos. Perhaps I should hire a photographer to come to my shoots.
But where in the world were I find someone who would want to spend they're day watching me tickle gorgeous women in bikinis?

 

[Raul]

Yeah, you're right. That is a tough one. Well, good luck.

Raul😉

 

[WallStreet]

I'm glad you all liked the pics. I just picked up new digital photo equipment today, so my future updates will be of a much higher quality than the crap I have posted now.
I think that the bulk of my yahoo members are mutes. They never post messages. They all just want to see the pics. Good thing I provide photos, or that place would be pretty boring.
I've added about 200 new members over the last two days.

 

[WallStreet]

Vandalism

Apparantly not everyone likes my new pics.
It appears that someone has hacked into my yahoo group and blurred all of the photos.
I have the originals of all of these pics, so this person is not hurting me. He is merely taking away from the enjoyment of all those who visit my group.
That's really the bad thing about the internet. It provides an outlet for friendless people who can't get laid, can't find a real job, can't find happiness, and can't find any productive direction in life.
So what they do instead is try to ruin things for the other people who are just looking for a little enjoyment.
I will try to rectify this problem. I apologize who didn't get a chance to look at the "pre-hacked" photos.

 

[WallStreet]

I believe I have repaired all of the photos. It should be good to go.

 

[mabus]

Don't worry about those little turd hackers, Wallstreet. Everyone knows who Wallstreet is, but no one knows, or cares, who they are. You're producing entertainment, they're just mucking up everyone's good time. They always fade away.

Get a book on model and/or portrait photography. That will help a lot. It looks like you used the light on the camera, an the hotel lights. That's why the black pantyhose looks almost white. (I'd prefer tan or nude pantyhose, but hey, pantyhose is pantyhose! Great job!)

Go down to your local photography shop, and get some small lights. Professional lights are better than hotel or consumer bulbs. They produce more light, and cover a larger area. Camera's need a lot of even light. Too much in one place, or if the light is too close to the model, and the image wil be washed out, too little and it looks dark and amateurish.

Photographers usually use around three lights. Two on either side of the model, and one to light the back area behind her. (Basically, light the "set.")

If your camera has an exposure setting, practice with that, too. If it set too high, the picture will be washed out, if it set too low, it wll be too dark, no matter how many lights you use.

Good luck!

 

[WallStreet]

Mabuss-- I actually do use a large light which does a good job of illuminating my video shoots.
But a cambination of cheap film and bad angles are what brings down my photos.
I have rectified the cheap film, as everything will now be digital.
And I will heed you're advice and be more conscious of the angle that I am lighting.
I'm usually pressed for time when I shoot, so I can't do set changes the way I'd like to.

 

[mabus]

First off, broaden your horizons.
What does a director do all day long?
Solve problems!

A good director can take a limiting situation and make it unlimited. A hotel room doesn't have to be limited.

First off, do you realize you have a hallway? You can have a model walking down the hallway and into the room, if you'd like to incorporate that into a shoot. (Assuming, hopefully, you make a full video one day to sell.)

The quality of the camera is very important, as you noted. Digital, like MiniDV, is the best today, and the camera's are now around $400 or $500. Look for one that has manual controls for brightness/exposure, focus, and a lot of light sensitivity. Check the instructions well to see how to work all the menu's and buttons, because my camera has three different settings for lights: halogen, sunlight, and fluorescent. The wrong light setting, and the picture will look too red, or too blue. If you get a camera with a white balance, even better. You will need a white posterboard to white balance it, which sets the level of the colors to true white, so the image looks like real life, not too green or red, or whatever.

The one large light is the problem. The background stays dark, and the foreground area is too bright because the background is so dark. If you've ever taken video of the clouds and trees, if you aim up at the clouds, the trees become dark. If you tilt down to the trees, the clouds become washed out. That's because the color difference is too great. The more sensitive cameras do a better job of matching everything than the cheaper analog VHS-C models do.

That's why when you light the set, you have a light on either side of the model, and one more to light the back set, the room. On a movie, the director will be lighting the fricking ceiling sometimes, and you'd be wondering, "What the hell is he doing?" - making sure you can see the ceiling so that when the monster comes aross it, you can actually see it.

The way to not be pressed or time, is to start doing pre-production. That's why you can hand me or anyone who has studied directing in college, and hand a camera to just some guy having fun, and our stuff will look better. We will sit down and actually plan out everything, and he'll just shoot whatever.

We'll set up a tripod, and lights and stuff.

Basically, use storyboards. I suggest you look at photographs of people in bondage, or people being tickled, ones that are really good positions, that people would wish would become live action, and base your work on that. Or just invent something different. Harmony Concepts actually has a lot of great poses in their regular videos, and you could use those poses and carry it into tickling. Or look at all the artwork out there. Or pictures in magazines, or movies.

Get an editting program like Adobe Premiere, many now come with new digital camcorders and are already installed in computers.

Think about costumes and dress. If the colors kind of match, it will be exposed better. Like, a white outfit with tan pantyhose and white shoes will look a little more clear than a black outfit and white pantyhose. The outfit or pantyhose will be washed out. (But then again, black looks so nice with a nice pair of tan pantyhose, or bare legged for the barefoot fans, so you may not care, or want that look!)

Since I love pantyhose, I suggest the barely there, really thin no RHT ones. It will almost look barefoot, and will be more ticklish since they are thin, and will photograph better. FM Concepts use those baggy ass brownish RHT nylons, and they look like crap. I've always believed that's why so many people don't like pantyhose, and for that I can't blame them. It doesn't photograph well and looks bad.

Lets say you want a model to be working at the desk, waiting for her tickle to come. (Like, the hotel has a tickling service!) You want her to sit at the desk and dangle her shoes. Or she has on sandals, or she has taken off her shoes, and you want to show her and cut to her feet bobbing back and forth. You shoot her at the desk, which is against the wall. Light her, and under the desk so you can see her legs. But then you want to see the front of her feet, but it's really cramped under that desk, so you don't think it's possible. This is where your directing sense comes into focus. Video is all about illusion. Just move the desk away from the wall, and light under the desk, and shoot her feet. People will assume it's natural, because they can't see that the desk is moved away from the wall!

There are all kinds of stories on the forum, too. I see that Tickle TV is making small plot films. Why not try that yourself?

 

[sole seeker]

I enjoyed your site, Wallstreet! Some great pics there.

BTW, I'm registered on your site as Sole_Seeker_7. Someone already had my name in use on Yahoo. I hope he/she's a decent person. Hate to get a bad rep based on someone else's posts.

 

[WallStreet]

Sole Seeker-- I'm glad that you enjoyed my pics. If the other sole seeker gets out of line, we'll just have to kill him.