Whoa MTP Whoa!!!

Neutron · Oct 11, 2001

I noticed what I consider an EXCELLENT trend in 3 of MTP latest videos and also something I think would be a pretty decent idea from their 4th latest video.

In three of the videos they've tied a gorgeous lady (Phoenix, Esther, and Angelical) face down on a table and take a damn fine run at their upper thighs and ass. I find this totally hot especially since they've gone straight for the kill. Excellent wiggling, excellent response!!! I plan on ordering these videos very soon the only reason I haven't is I have another habit, that is a lifelong love of Battleships and I've had a wonderful opportunity to buy two expensive Battleship Books for a price of 75 each. ( Original price over 300 each , low proce I've seen is 145. A guy from another message board offered my his volumes on british Battleships for 75 each, Some damn decent people are on the net.)

Ok my idea. And anyone can poke holes in it if I'm out of line. I sort of got it from the latest Ashley and Dita clip and my latest tickling session with an escort.

Jeff has this Sabrina girl (or any other lady who's a master tickler can do. I found it totally smoking when Magic touch had Dita and a man just start in with Ashley while they sat on that couch. So here it goes.

I woul;dn't mind seeing one of the bigger girls, say an Eshter or Angelica type in their panties (and a bra if you wish) They can also start out in a school girl skirt. Have them standing. Tie their arms behind their back. Tie their legs spread with a spreader bar or a broomstick. Basically they'd be able to walk and move but not escape. Then have a female, or two females, or hell even Jeff. Just start tickling them. Tickle them all over and watch the fun!!!. If they fall or end up in another position just go after them. Every so often give them a break. Then start over again!!!. The reason I mentioned a skirt would be ok is at times it adds some additional mystery and of course tickling can be done under the skirt. You'd still get some wonderful views of her bikini and/or panties. (I saw something similar to this under skirt in another video and it was totally hot). Of course she can't keep the skirt for the whole video! I know a video like this wouldn't offer too much foot tickling (for those who like it) But I think the chase and struggles would be excellent.

Everyone often says the latest Paradise video is very fresh and unique. Personally I think the above video could be better. If you want to make it hotter. Maybe tie two ladies in this position and go at them (Alexis and arianna!!).That's just my cut.

By the way I bought Strip Tickle from Magic Touch and Real Tickling Fantasy from Realtickling. Both are excellent. Good buys. I love Ember and of course I could watch Sara get tickled in a cage all day!

Be safe all

Tron

Strelnikov · Oct 12, 2001

Battleship Fetish?

Dang! I thought that I was the only one. $75 for a $300 book is great! Jane's Fighting Ships for 1910, maybe?

About 15 years ago, I had an opportunity to steal "Ironclads In Action" (2 vols, 1897) from my local library. Honesty won out, and I didn't. Went to check it out again to read last year, and some @#$% had STOLEN IT!!!

Strelnikov

Neutron · Oct 12, 2001

Janes

Stelnikov,

I wouldn't touch Janes Fighting Ships if you paid me. It's a rag. I bought british Battleships by Oscar Parkes. Damn thing is about a 1000 pages long. If you're a serious battleship buff go to www.warships1.com

I go to the Battleships vs. Battleships board. A MUST stop for your internetting battleship fun

Tron

Strelnikov · Oct 12, 2001

Thanks Neutron. I'll have to check the site out.

I disagree about Jane's. Illos aren't the best, but there's a wealth of technical and reference info and it gives an overview of the WHOLE fleet in question.

At least, that's true of the old ones. Don't know about the current Jane's, after 1945 I lose interest. To each his own, I guess.

Strelnikov

Neutron · Oct 12, 2001

Nope Strelnikov AND what about my video idea???

Strelnikov,

Nope. Janes is relatively interesting fiction, but if you do research you'll find about the only things they're accurate on are ships length and armament. They give very missleading facts. particularly te old ones. For instance the HMS Agincourt is listed in janes as having a 6 inch armoured deck. Which would have made her one of the best protected ships of her time. When in fact a ship with that many turrets couldn't have a 6 inch armoured deck. She had 4 decks with 1.5 inch armor A PIECE. Which isn't the same thing. Also she only in very few places was that armor in a configuration where the the 1.5 inch decks were lined up so they had a total of 6 inches.

That's my problems with Janes and also the History Channel. Look into some of the stuff they put out and it just doesn't stack up. Janes is decent, but not if you're really into it.

Janes perpetuates the Bismarck myth, that is the Bismarck was the most powerful warship of her time. Which isn't the truth by any means. Bismarck was the most popular battleship DESIGNED to fight a WW1 style engagement, whic fought in WW2. A decent ship but outclassed by ships which were built even 15 years before her.

I always encourage people to get involved in Battleships because they're fascinating pieces of machinery and politics. So if someone says they read Janes I'll say great. Have fun. It's a decent starter (kind of like a beginners reader text for kids). But so far as a reliable resource. Not hardly. I used to get a real kick out of reading what Janes said about the submarine I was on when I was in the navy. Funny stuff but not accurate by any means.

Go to www.warships.com and mention Janes and see the laughs you'll get.

NOW what do people think of my video idea???

Tron

Now back on topic.