Haltickling
2nd Level Green Feather
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2001
- Messages
- 4,353
- Points
- 0
I just saw the movie 'Sirens' on German TV, and I must say it aroused me more than many tickle videos. For those who don't know it, here's a short description of what caught my attention so much:
Some time in the 1920s. A young vicar and his wife are sent to a small community in Australia to clerically influence the infamous painter Lindsay who seems to lead a lascivious life: His wife and three nudie models live together in a house and play all sorts of erotic games. One of their favorite games obviously is to tickle the youngest model Giddi (Portia de Rossi, the other 2 are Elle MacPherson and Kate Fisher).
The most fascinating scene is where the three models lie around (fully clothed but barefoot) on the lawn, and Elle MacPherson threatens Giddi: "You're sooo ticklish! You know what? One day we will really tickle you out of your skin, over and over and over, tickle you till you'll squirt your inside out!" - "NO you won't!" - "Oh, we will, and do you know who else will tickle you? He!" (pointing at an athletic young servant whom Giddi has a crush upon). The conversation revolves around tickling for several minutes. I was ecstatic!
There are quite a lot of other references to tickling in other dialogues, and even two very brief tickling scenes (one with Portia de Rossi, one with Tara Fitzgerald as the vicar's wife after she got tied to a tree), but these scenes didn't get to me as much as the long conversation about tickling. The whole atmosphere at the painter's house transcended so much eroticism, with lots of visible skin, many barefoot scenes, and so many paint brushes around everywhere. Still, it's not a porn movie; TV declared it free for over 12 years old viewers.
Why are we so fascinated when tickling is mentioned in mainstream movies? We got hundreds of videos with real tickle action to choose from, many of them very good. Yet, we get so thrilled when the mere word 'tickling' gets mentioned in a mainstream movie. Any explanation attempts from movie or psychology buffs? 🙂
The TV appearance caught me unprepared, and I didn't tape it. They rerun it tonight at 4.15am, and as my VCR timer is broken, I'll have to get up to switch my VCR on. And I'll certainly try to get the English original, if possible in an uncut version.
Some time in the 1920s. A young vicar and his wife are sent to a small community in Australia to clerically influence the infamous painter Lindsay who seems to lead a lascivious life: His wife and three nudie models live together in a house and play all sorts of erotic games. One of their favorite games obviously is to tickle the youngest model Giddi (Portia de Rossi, the other 2 are Elle MacPherson and Kate Fisher).
The most fascinating scene is where the three models lie around (fully clothed but barefoot) on the lawn, and Elle MacPherson threatens Giddi: "You're sooo ticklish! You know what? One day we will really tickle you out of your skin, over and over and over, tickle you till you'll squirt your inside out!" - "NO you won't!" - "Oh, we will, and do you know who else will tickle you? He!" (pointing at an athletic young servant whom Giddi has a crush upon). The conversation revolves around tickling for several minutes. I was ecstatic!
There are quite a lot of other references to tickling in other dialogues, and even two very brief tickling scenes (one with Portia de Rossi, one with Tara Fitzgerald as the vicar's wife after she got tied to a tree), but these scenes didn't get to me as much as the long conversation about tickling. The whole atmosphere at the painter's house transcended so much eroticism, with lots of visible skin, many barefoot scenes, and so many paint brushes around everywhere. Still, it's not a porn movie; TV declared it free for over 12 years old viewers.
Why are we so fascinated when tickling is mentioned in mainstream movies? We got hundreds of videos with real tickle action to choose from, many of them very good. Yet, we get so thrilled when the mere word 'tickling' gets mentioned in a mainstream movie. Any explanation attempts from movie or psychology buffs? 🙂
The TV appearance caught me unprepared, and I didn't tape it. They rerun it tonight at 4.15am, and as my VCR timer is broken, I'll have to get up to switch my VCR on. And I'll certainly try to get the English original, if possible in an uncut version.