Women Pay for Tickling?

[TickledToDeath]

Curious question here.

Knowing that guys will go out and pay a professional "Mistress" or "Submissive" or "Switch" for tickle sessions..... will any women do this?
Would women pay to tickle a guy or BE tickled by a so called "Professional" or business person in this "field"?
Say a couple was in this for business reasons. Would women or a woman pay to tickle torture one or both of this couple or pay to BE tickled by one or both of them?

Your responses, comments and feedback would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks.

TTD

 

[MistressValerie1]

I don't see why not, although historically, across many cultures, women rarely pay for any kind of intimate service, even where it is fully legal and acceptable. I recall reading about a legal brothel in modern-day Germany for women customers only, attached to a beauty salon. The business closed because it went broke from lack of customers.

 

[nessonite1]

Interesting, TTD....
I think it would be too weird for me. I wouldn't be into it if the other person (be they lee or ler) was doing it out of obligation.

 

[guilimoi1]

I discussed about it with prostitutes in Amsterdam (Holland).
A young blonde in her early twenties told me a lesbian (around 20-24 y old) once paid her to be tied up and tickle tortured. The blonde prostitute didn't mind to be tied up and tickled herself.
Another one a bit older with long black hair told me she had often clients for tickling. Most of the time, they were couples. The man wanted to see her wife or girlfriend tied up and tickled by this prostitute with long finger nails

 

[TickledToDeath]

Interesting, TTD....
I think it would be too weird for me. I wouldn't be into it if the other person (be they lee or ler) was doing it out of obligation.

I understand your point and couldn't agree more. HOWever, what if the person or people offering this service were genuinly INTO tickling and tickle torture? (Had the reputation and were KNOWN to be this way)


TTD

 

[TickledToDeath]

I discussed about it with prostitutes in Amsterdam (Holland).
A young blonde in her early twenties told me a lesbian (around 20-24 y old) once paid her to be tied up and tickle tortured. The blonde prostitute didn't mind to be tied up and tickled herself.
Another one a bit older with long black hair told me she had often clients for tickling. Most of the time, they were couples. The man wanted to see her wife or girlfriend tied up and tickled by this prostitute with long finger nails

LMAO! guilimoi, from what I know and heard about Amsterdam, they are into just about anything and everythign and are definitely UNinhibited to say the least along with people who visit there as well. That is definitely one place I would like to visit someday before I am too old to enjoy it! 😎

Women HERE in the USA are somewhat different I would think.

TTD

 

[TickledToDeath]

I don't see why not, although historically, across many cultures, women rarely pay for any kind of intimate service, even where it is fully legal and acceptable. I recall reading about a legal brothel in modern-day Germany for women customers only, attached to a beauty salon. The business closed because it went broke from lack of customers.

I too personally don't see why not. Although I can see your point but there is a difference between a "Brothel" and a service offering Tickling and tickle torture to its' clients.
Definitely more men frequent these services. Why not women.

TTD

 

[MistressValerie1]

This is an interesting topic. 🙂

"Conventional wisdom" states that women supposedly require more of an emotional attachment than men in order to enjoy intimate activity, although the modern phenomenon of "free love" calls that into question. Some women do maintain lasting relationships with a particular sexual worker (as in the classic "gigolo" relationship), but apparently few women seem to enjoy intimate services that they have to pay for.

I don't know why this is true, even in open-minded societies and across different cultures; it makes one wonder if there is at least a weak biological basis of some kind. In favour of a biological basis is that among animals observed trading food or other goods for intimate services, the same pattern exists: the female is the one who is paid for services, while the male is the one who pays.

Love to all,

 

[USATKLR]

i agree. Women should have the same right as me do to be tickled. Im not just sayin this because its in the froum, but because, i am a strong believer in equallity. If me pay to do it, women can do. No problem with that whatsoever.

 

[morgandee]

I find it kind of lame that anyone would charge for such an activity

Not because of the fact that it could be a service to those with the crazy fetish for it or that I would be mad that anyone would sell such a thing and dare take my good hard earned money of walking around and doing nothing from me for something so menial

But the fact that it is a normal activity turned into some entrepreneurship and all it is then is whoring which I guess is appropriate even though it closely resembles people selling used ticket stubs on Ebay

But if you want to pay for that kind of stuff be my guest

 

[nessonite1]

Of course then that would change things entirely, TTD. 😀 But I'd have to be really in need to want to pay for it. 😀

 

[sXeTickleDiva]

I would perfere it be pure from someone I know and are close to. So no I would not pay.

 

[TickledToDeath]

Very interesting responses so far. Thanks to all for doing so and please continue! Keep em coming!

TTD

 

[TickledToDeath]

I would perfere it be pure from someone I know and are close to. So no I would not pay.

Definitely understandable. Pure makes a difference. Paying for it may indeed take away from the enjoyment as well especially when specifically "Timed".
Knowing when it will end deminishes from the mental aspect too.

Thanks for your comment and response, TicklishDiva.

TTD

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

the Hollywood Brother feel women should not have to pay for it. as a Hollywood Brother true gentlemen, it is the Hollywood Brother's life's work to give his future lady whatever she desires, whether it be bondage, tickling, vacations, jewels, a family pet or anytihng else. it will be the way of the Hollywood Brother to someday dedicate his life to whoever is dumb enough to fall or the charms of the Hollywood Brother

 

[TickledToDeath]

the Hollywood Brother feel women should not have to pay for it. as a Hollywood Brother true gentlemen, it is the Hollywood Brother's life's work to give his future lady whatever she desires, whether it be bondage, tickling, vacations, jewels, a family pet or anytihng else. it will be the way of the Hollywood Brother to someday dedicate his life to whoever is dumb enough to fall or the charms of the Hollywood Brother

LOL.........Hollywood, a response any less from you would have been a surprise my friend.

HOWever, Brother of wood Holly, twas not a question of whether or not women should HAVE to pay for tickling or being tickled but whether or not they WOULD.

Furthermore though, I am sure the single gals out here or there will be happy to know that a future with you will include, bondage, tickling, vacations, jewels and a pet.

TTD

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

if we will allow the hollywood Brother to be serious then the answer is yes, there is no reason why a lady can not pay for the tickling session. However the Hollywood brother still think it a crime that a lovely lady (and all ladies are lovely) has too pay because no one wants to volunter there hollywood brother tickle services for free

 

[Papabear1]

Nessie, I could be obliged to tickle you without any remuniration whatsoever. But more on topic why not since there have been gigalos for plain sex why not special fun. Back when I thought 30 was old I dreamed of being an older woman's tickling gigalo. Though I do not look like Richard Gere, unless he has been hit by a bus recently it was a dream.

 

[TickledToDeath]

Hmmmm so as I would probably see it.....women would be more apt to pay TO tickle then they would pay to BE tickled?

Safer I guess and they can be very evil too since they will expect to get what they pay for.
lol

TTD

 

[bare-bellied]

Hmmmm so as I would probably see it.....women would be more apt to pay TO tickle then they would pay to BE tickled?

Safer I guess and they can be very evil too since they will expect to get what they pay for.
lol

TTD

All this is nice to ponder TTD, but if we were to have a Tickle Challenge, where the women could earn prize money from a purse or bets, based on their tickling skills, we would still have no takers. They are just not into a scene where tickling strangers is involved, for free or pay.

 

[pennyg]

sounds like a fun business. Count me in. The Dutchess

 

[carolinatickle]

I'd be happy to do it free of charge!!

 

[jonareed]

This is an interesting topic. 🙂

"Conventional wisdom" states that women supposedly require more of an emotional attachment than men in order to enjoy intimate activity, although the modern phenomenon of "free love" calls that into question.

Well, it's not really called into question at all. It's simple evolution.

There's a major difference between men and women when discussing the topic of sex, and that is that women are the ones who may be stuck with the result of the sexual encounter if the man leaves. The man, outside of moral responsibilities, of course, has nothing to lose by impregnating a female and then leaving.

The point is this- it's not "conventional wisdom" or anything like that that makes a woman want to have a little more emotional attachment before sex. It's instinct.

There's nothing wrong with that instinct. When it doesn't work properly, we get (in America, at least) a woman known as a "welfare queen".

 

[MistressValerie1]

My observation is that female sex workers as well as promiscuous amateurs have little trouble enaging in sexual encounters with large numbers of men, with little or no emotional attachment to most. It seems that while women generally don't want to pay for intimate services, many can be comfortable with being paid. I don't know the reasons behind that, but the same behaviour has been observed in non-human animals in which the male of certain species offers food or objects to the female as a way of attracting her; however, I haven't heard of any case where the roles were reversed 🙂

 

[nessonite1]

very interesting Missy Val....I never thought of that...