Would you pay to play?

[FatJay]

OK, I sense that this thread may wither and die on the vine judging by the amount of manga there is floating around. Nothing against younger members, I wish I had been so in touch with myself 10 years ago. Still, my point is it seems the majority won't have the money to do this, but I'd like to be proven wrong.

The question is, have you ever paid anyone professional to either tickle you or be tickled? This particularly goes for Stateside tickle fiends. There is (or at least was) a place in NYC called something like Rebecca's Hidden chamber. It was basically an S&M place, but they had subs and switches, most of whom stated that they were into tickling and were up for being tickled. Did anyone out there do anything like that? Would you?
And here's a moral question thrown in, do you think it's wrong to tickle someone else if you have a girlfriend/boyfriend (assuming nothing happens beyond the tickling and nothing is exposed beyond the more traditional tickle areas).
Was that two threads? Am I going to get a whupping from Mistress Valerie? Apologies if I've gone on too long. Anyway, anyone?

PS Nothing against manga, it's just I'm 31 and I don't get it. I'm assuming those who do are younger. The Family Guy kills me though. I'll shut up now. 😀

 

[David Tyler]

Right now I'm involved and she knows my fetishes... if she found me tickling someone, she would consider it cheating... HOWEVER, SHE isn't very ticklish. How do I satisfy those urges without going outside of the relationship? It's a real problem for me.

The only time I really got to her was immediately after sex. After she orgasms, she's very sensitive down there. Read 'ticklish' into that. I had her laughing and in tears.

So, is it cheating to us? Since it's sexual to me, MAYBE. Still, if it doesn't result in sex and I bring my state of excitement home to her, isn't it the same thing as if I went to a strip club and got a lap dance? She doesn't consider that cheating.

Someone help me figure this out.

I'd definitely pay some girl to let me tickle her pretty stocking feet but I feel I'm stuck.

 

[CheshireCatNY]

I don't pay for what I believe I can get for free if I just work at it hard enough. There actually used to be a woman who provided such a service named Evania who operated in the eastern U.S. but I hear tell she traveled around quite a bit...

And dude, don't get us wrong....us manga fans will ALWAYS be more interested in the real thing as opposed to artwork. Trust me! LOL

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

the hollywood brother ought ot have people pay him to get tickled by the hollywood brother himself but i nall seriousness the hollywood brother is not sure if he would pay someone although the hollywood brother if he was rich would probably do so in a heartbeat

 

[FatJay]

And dude, don't get us wrong....us manga fans will ALWAYS be more interested in the real thing as opposed to artwork. Trust me! LOL[/QUOTE]

Actually I get the tickling artwork entirely, some of it is hotter than the pictures. I hate it when you have bored looking models with grotty feet, you can always tell which pictures are taken by a real fetishist and which are done by a porn artist who is trying out tickling as a sideline. Artwork is all about the fetish and that's all good in my book.

BTW Cheshire Cat, I like your sig pic. I actually have a Cheshire Cat tattoo - I used to actually live there (in England not Wonderland). Random, useless information but I felt a bond and felt I should share it.😎

 

[Sockstickler]

I think I'd have to agree with Cheshire Cat. I don't know if I'd feel right paying for something that I could, with a little effort and a lot of luck, get for free. It would mean more to me too, since the tickling would be between two people who actually liked it for what it is, as opposed to the other person just being paid to act like they like it, you know?

 

[catmac]

I have never nor would I really consider it. I agree with CheshireCat, that all it takes is a little work and you can do it for free. I think that anyone who wants to make you pay is just trying to exploit whoever they are asking.

 

[Kalamos]

Yes. I would.
Nothing beats *owning* somebody for a night or one hour.

...

It's like having slaves, without the hassle of feeding them.

...

😀 😀 😀

 

[catmac]

Oh Kalamos

Yes. I would.
Nothing beats *owning* somebody for a night or one hour.

...

It's like having slaves, without the hassle of feeding them.

...

😀 😀 😀

Haha.....that's kinda funny. I don't know if I would put it that way, but whatever works.

 

[Sockstickler]

Well, Kal has a pretty...unique outlook on stuff. This is just one example 😎

 

[MistressValerie1]

I would have no objection to paying for it if I could afford it and wanted some variety or experimentation.

 

[CheshireCatNY]

BTW Cheshire Cat, I like your sig pic. I actually have a Cheshire Cat tattoo - I used to actually live there (in England not Wonderland). Random, useless information but I felt a bond and felt I should share it.😎

Thats awesome. I still have to get my Cheshire Cat tattoo when I have enough money. I already have an image of Alice with the flamingo croquet mallet on the upper right side of my back and am getting the White Rabbit done as well....

 

[FatJay]

Thats awesome. I still have to get my Cheshire Cat tattoo when I have enough money. I already have an image of Alice with the flamingo croquet mallet on the upper right side of my back and am getting the White Rabbit done as well....

Sometimes I think mine backfired a bit. I've got the face and the tail with nothing inbetween. Usually when people see it they say 'Oh, you've got two tattoos. What are they? If I give it time they usually get it. I still think it's pretty cool though and I've not seen anyone else with it which is pretty important.

Sorry, off subject. Actually the two bits of the threads I started are kind of linked. Fair enough getting it for free if you can, I agree. But what if the one you are with really isn't up for tickling? Is paying for it in that situation better because you're not inflicting your wants on someone? Or is it just cheating?

I checked the Bible - couldn't find anything about this in there. So I'm calling on the High Priests of Tickling ...
I could check Hinduism, there seem to be more bare feet and more arms (and therefore more fingers) involved.


I should probably quit smoking this stuff.

 

[DarkPoet]

I would never pay for it, but mostly because I'm not into that kind of tickling. For me, tickling is something that should be playful and innocent. I tickle my friends all the time, and when we get together for parties and hanging out, there's usually someone being held down and tickled for a little while, with people tickling each other through-out the day (especially me tickling them).

To pay for someone, or even have someone tied down / done for the purpose of exciting me, would be a breach of my own comfort level. Tickling excites me, yes, but I don't want to do it in order to get excited. Does that make any sense?

Well, anyways. You can probably see how hiring someone to be a 'tickle-slave' would not fit into what excited me about tickling. I would actually invite you to see how often happens in my daily life and how I enjoy it by showing you my home forums, but it's a private community for my friends and me to stay in touch, and they're mostly all under 18. But I'm always willing to talk on the subject, if anyone wants to drop me a line.

 

[-Kunoke-]

Sure, why not. Just not excess amounts of money. After all, I could go to several different friends and get it for free. 😉

 

[CellarDweller]

I've never paid anyone for it, but I don't see anything wrong with it.


I seem to remember a post on another site (maybe Jack's Rack) from a guy who claimed (probably just a story he made up) that he would cruise in his car to seedy sections of towns, where there were male prostitutes. When they would approach the car, he would offer them the money, not for sex, but for tickling. He said he got quite a few takers.

Somehow, I don't see that happening.