Your preferred ticklee's age

[stan327]

When tickling someone, do you prefer the 'lee be a certain age in relation to yours? Please explain why if you care to.

Although I love tickling all ladies I prefer them to be older. I think it's because when I was a kid, older ladies were always in positions of authority. Teachers, nurses, librarians, my friends' moms. So to turn the tables is exciting in it's own right let alone the rush one feels when doing some tickling.

 

[KoocheeKoo]

Well, in my younger days....as a teenager, I tended to tickle girls who were close to my age more than older or younger girls (the only younger girls I ever tickled was my sister and a few of her friends, and they were only two or three years younger than I was). I didn't tickle many older girls because they were only a couple in my neighborhood, and one of them was already married at age 17).

Now in my early 40's I honestly don't tickle very many women (Traci is the first lady I've dated since 1996); but if I did, it would most likely be women several years younger....because just as with Traci, I'd tend to date women 3-4 years or more younger than I am (I guess it's a family tradition: dad is over 13 years older than my stepmom...and was almost 5 years older than mom; granddad was 9 years older than my grandmother).

 

[Mitchell]

I probably prefer someone younger. At 34, I probably would want to date someone 25-30. Hopefully she would be a very ticklish 25-30 and also be at least tolerant about being tickled.

Mitch

 

[mgctouch]

The only important thing about age for me is that the 'lee be of legal age.

As I am only looking for friendships with tickling benefits and not relationsips or marraige, I am a bit more liberal age range. As long as the lady is of legal age I would consider a meeting.

The more important thing for me, though, is basing the friendship on trust and respect rather than tickling because a friendship based on trust ans respect with yield much better experiences and greater comfort levels. I detest when somebody plays the headgames or decpetive games which are so destructive to friendships.

 

[chi_tickler_jon]

Well, I guess you could say that I would prefer someone younger. I guess that's because I'm 32 now and I've always hoped to tickle someone who's got that sweet innocent "girl next door" look. Just so that she's at least 18 lol, but preferably in her 20's.

 

[TickledToDeath]

Technically, I have no pref. HOWever, being 43, one has to have some limitations. Definitely over 18 for sure but I think I would have to go with no younger than 21 and as far as the ceiling goes...probably depends on the the physicacality of the lee at her age. Couldn't really put a number on it. 50's ish?

TTD

 

[steph]

well

I dunno TTD--I'd be willing to bet there's a lotta guys on this board who wouldn't mind getting their hands on Sophia Loren, Goldie Hawn, Raquel Welch...I'm not a guy but as someone who looks younger than their actual age, I'd hope it's more of a "case by case" basis...

XOXO

Technically, I have no pref. HOWever, being 43, one has to have some limitations. Definitely over 18 for sure but I think I would have to go with no younger than 21 and as far as the ceiling goes...probably depends on the the physicacality of the lee at her age. Couldn't really put a number on it. 50's ish?

TTD

 

[TickledToDeath]

Re: well

I dunno TTD--I'd be willing to bet there's a lotta guys on this board who wouldn't mind getting their hands on Sophia Loren, Goldie Hawn, Raquel Welch...I'm not a guy but as someone who looks younger than their actual age, I'd hope it's more of a "case by case" basis...

XOXO

Good point and great examples of the exceptions to the rule. For sure it would be on a case by case basis as to where the time/age line is drawn.😉 😉 😀


TTD

 

[steph]

Re: Re: well

Claps hands

--good answer baby!

XOXO

Good point and great examples of the exceptions to the rule. For sure it would be on a case by case basis as to where the time/age line is drawn.😉 😉 😀


TTD

 

[mgctouch]

Re: well

I dunno TTD--I'd be willing to bet there's a lotta guys on this board who wouldn't mind getting their hands on Sophia Loren, Goldie Hawn, Raquel Welch...I'm not a guy but as someone who looks younger than their actual age, I'd hope it's more of a "case by case" basis...

XOXO

Having personally had the opportunity to work with Morgan Brittany in a play called LADIES AT THE ALAMO, I can confidently add Morgan Brittany to Steph's list. She is a gorgeous lady both externally (Looks) and internally (How genuine she is with us ordinary folk).

I would have loved to have an opportunity to tickle Morgan Brittany but I didn't know her well enough on a personal level to take such actions.

Bottom line, though, is that Steph is right. It is a case by case basis.

Now I just have to figure out how to hook up with Steph for some tickling fun. What do you think, guys? Do you think I have a chance???

 

[steph]

Re: Re: well

LOL--Mgctouch--
you big flatterer, you! Hate to burst the bubble but although I'm waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay younger than the above mentioned hotties and am always mistaken for looking younger than my own age (shhhh! almost 40!), I'll never be in the same league with such beauties (I wish!) But Morgan Brittany, wow! There's a lovely--hey, how about Connie Selleca! Still looking REALLY good guys...Hey Magic--didya notice how all those that said "20s" got REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAlly quiet??? <giggles>

XOXO

Having personally had the opportunity to work with Morgan Brittany in a play called LADIES AT THE ALAMO, I can confidently add Morgan Brittany to Steph's list. She is a gorgeous lady both externally (Looks) and internally (How genuine she is with us ordinary folk).

I would have loved to have an opportunity to tickle Morgan Brittany but I didn't know her well enough on a personal level to take such actions.

Bottom line, though, is that Steph is right. It is a case by case basis.

Now I just have to figure out how to hook up with Steph for some tickling fun. What do you think, guys? Do you think I have a chance???

 

[chrisheaven]

being ticklish is the important factor

 

[steph]

it's in the bag.

 

[mgctouch]

To tell you the truth, Steph, I don't care if my tickle partner is 21 or 45. The following criteria are important for me when meeting with a new tickle partner:

1) LEGAL AGE. As long as the lady is 18 or over, I will galdly meet with them as long as my other stipulations are also met. I can participate in platonic tickling and I can also particpate in erotic tickling which can get sexual if that is the desire of both parties. For those reasons, as well as legalities, the lady must be at least 18.

2) RESPECT. When I chat with a lady about tickling and the possibilities of tickling, I give, and expect to receive, total respect. After you have chatted with a person long enough, you can get a sence of whether the respect is there or not.

3) HONESTY. When I consider meeting a person, I want to know that the person is being honest and above board with me. I look for ladies who I can build a good, trusting friendship with and I am weary of the few who play deceptive headgames. Just look at what happened to the college football coach (Coach Price) who took a "dancer" to his hotel room for the purposes of touching and tickling her. She ran up over $1,000 on his credit card and blabbed to the press causing him to lose his job (and possibly, his marraige). Granted, he fooled around but the point is, I need to trust the person I am developing a friendship with.

4. TICKLISH? As long as the first three stipulations are completely satisfied, the fourth obvious stipulation is that she be more than just "slightly ticklish". It is always frustrating to tickle a person who is either not ticklish or totally able to control the tickling so that they don't react. Just takes all the fun out of it.

4) LIKES TO TICKLE. This is not as important as the first four as I would willingly tickle a ticklee. I, however, enjoy the pleasures of being tickled so I prefer to meet ladies who will tickle me as well.

I can understand how many members of this group as partial to younger looking 'lees & 'lers and I cannot fault anybody for their preferences. My only 'warning' is that you might miss out on a very special 'ler or 'lee if you don't take things on a case-by-case basis and base it entirely on age and looks.

I will now climb off of my pedistool.

 

[steph]

oh well then

I'll reveal my actual age to you--it's 85 (shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!) My munchmates are all REALLY GOOD LIARS!

P.S. I paid the girl on those pics from Ray & Tracy's site...CAT'S OUTTA THE BAAAAAAAAAG...<gg>

XOXO

 

[mgctouch]

Re: oh well then

I'll reveal my actual age to you--it's 85 (shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!) My munchmates are all REALLY GOOD LIARS!

P.S. I paid the girl on those pics from Ray & Tracy's site...CAT'S OUTTA THE BAAAAAAAAAG...<gg>

XOXO

You don't look a day over 21!

(Does that score me any brownie points???)

 

[steph]

Re: Re: oh well then

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, it is possible.

It's tempting but I think I'll have to think about it (is that redundant??) and get back to ya on that one mmmmmmmmm'kay???

XOXO

You don't look a day over 21!

(Does that score me any brownie points???)

 

[mgctouch]

Re: Re: Re: oh well then

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm, it is possible.

It's tempting but I think I'll have to think about it (is that redundant??) and get back to ya on that one mmmmmmmmm'kay???

XOXO

I wouldn't say that it is redundant but it might be repetitive. I'll patiently await your reply.

 

[steph]

well

Ok then --you win--Brownie Points big time for you-ONLY if you don't say that to ALL the chicas--which I'm sure you do--Hmmmm? <gg>

XOXO

 

[mgctouch]

Re: well

Ok then --you win--Brownie Points big time for you-ONLY if you don't say that to ALL the chicas--which I'm sure you do--Hmmmm? <gg>

XOXO

I plead the fifth!

If you really want to find out though, you'll have to tickle it out of me!

 

[steph]

hmmm

Then I guess you're in trouble noooooooooooooooooooooooooow....<gg>

XOXO

 

[Faramir]

Re: oh well then

I'll reveal my actual age to you--it's 85 (shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!) My munchmates are all REALLY GOOD LIARS!

P.S. I paid the girl on those pics from Ray & Tracy's site...CAT'S OUTTA THE BAAAAAAAAAG...<gg>

XOXO

...I just HAD to reply to this one Steph...I about fell outta my chair I was laughing so much...!! I'm going to be 100 on 3/13...howsa 'bout a date...??? we could break out our candy apple red walker's and paint the town...!! etc.


Oh...and mgctouch...I REALLY hope you didn't mis-spell this word I'm quoting from one of your earlier post's (pedistool) on purpose...leaves WAY to much room open for interpretation. I believe the word you were thinking of is...pedestal (btw, my comment is not a flame, merely an observation).

 

[mgctouch]

Re: Re: oh well then

... Oh...and mgctouch...I REALLY hope you didn't mis-spell this word I'm quoting from one of your earlier post's (pedistool) on purpose...leaves WAY to much room open for interpretation. I believe the word you were thinking of is...pedestal (btw, my comment is not a flame, merely an observation).

Good eye, Faramir. It was unintentional. That is what happens when you start posting at 2:30 AM after 10 hours on the job. My faux pas.

 

[mgctouch]

Re: hmmm

Then I guess you're in trouble noooooooooooooooooooooooooow....<gg>

XOXO

Steph, Is that a promise or a threat?

 

[steph]

hmmmm....

maybe little bit of both???