Fully Nude: (or just a small area)

[tickletorments1]

I got to thinking (yes i know it can be painful when i do that :lol)

I wondered if being clothed with just a small amount of flesh exposed for tickling say like a gap between jeans and a shirt or blouse, socks half off.

Or completely naked which would give the best tickle result i guess there are a lot of factors involved here.

From a ler point of view just so long as i hit that most ticklish area i don't mind.

If i were in the lee situation i think the humiliation of being nude, would get me half way to breaking point before the tickling even started.

(hmmm i should be so lucky:rolleyes)

(sorry in us speak nakkid spelt it wrong now anyway )

 

[IndyTicklePhile]

There are merits to both. I can be driven to hysteria and tears with long fingernails under my shirt, socks, or boxers. I think it is the inability to see the contact with the skin that is maddening.

Speaking as a 'lee (most of the time), nothing is better than the vulnerability of being bound and nude, knowing the entire surface area of my skin is at the tickler's whim until the tickler gets tired. Just seeing the wicked glee my wife gets is an aphrodisiac.

If you want the best of both elements, I would suggest bound, nude, and blindfolded. I think I may try the blindfold next time, along with bondage that better exposes the hypersensitive man areas and bum to the wife. : ) Happy tickling!