• The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The TMF is sponsored by:

Clips4Sale Banner

Just me ?

ftmench

TMF Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2002
Messages
799
Points
0
Or are most members in early teens?
I am 43.
 
Last edited:
Considering you're not even allowed to be here unless you're 18 or older, I don't see how that could be so.
 
I imagine there's more than afew teens sneaking in here, dispite the age-disclaimer. Hell, I've ever seen people post saying that they lurked around while they were under-age.
Wish they wouldn't, though. That poses a danger to the forum.

Hey kids! Fuck off! Adults only! Dig?
 
Dude....I posted here since I was like 14. There's probably a ton of underage people's here. Just stay safe, okay kid?
 
I, Garimto, have noticed far more many of our generation, the ancient wisdom of which I am to become accustomed, grazing quietly on the farthest reaches of the space of our here, spending what is to become most certainly the luminous years of the life in comfort and happiness. Such is a gift for all?
 
I, Garimto, have noticed far more many of our generation, the ancient wisdom of which I am to become accustomed, grazing quietly on the farthest reaches of the space of our here, spending what is to become most certainly the luminous years of the life in comfort and happiness. Such is a gift for all?

lmfao. I love you. You make me giggle.
 
I think that Ftmench meant "Is it just my opinion ... ?" rather than identifying himself as underage. We take every precaution to protect the forum as best we can, but ultimately, parents need to take some responsibilty by using appropriate filtering software and monitoring their children's Internet use. Many ISP's offer free filtering software to parents.
 
Many parents are competely computer illiterate and are completely beside themselves when it comes to computer technology. Their kids know more than they do, and thats a part of the problem. The parent chooses to be ignorant.
 
Not chooses. My mother is 57--she's become unable to learn anything new related to the computer. Some part of her brain got locked off between about 1994 and today. It's cognitive.

Whether thats true or not, thats why I said "many". I did not say what I did in a general way, as there are many circumstances which could keep a parent from learning, especially one from an earlier generation such as our mothers who grew up when PC computers were a relatively new concept (my mother is 56 and doesn't know much about computers either, but it's out of her being too busy to learn and there not being a computer she can call her own. She's otherwise eager to learn when she retires or has more freetime, and with her wits she'll quickly get the grasp of it and would be computting away in no time ^^).

Mainly, I was refering to the parents of children, teens, and just underagers in general. These parents are likely younger and are bombarded with technology all the time and many of them make extensive use of it themselves, just not computers. It is these parents, whom have access to the technology (it's in their house and they bought it), and the state of mind to be able to learn without there being such a gap in technological exposure (as it would be with an older parent) that choose not to involve themselves with their child's computer activity. Younger parents have less of an excuse, since they're statistically more likely to be making extensive use of the computer(s) themselves, whether for business, leisure, or both.

Even when thats not the case, and you have young parents who are still ignorant, then its a matter of knowing that there are dangers online and of course pornography (thats something they don't have to hear about from the computer, they hear that on tv, the radio, and in the newspapers). Even then, the parent should have enough presense of mind, dispite their ignorance of how to work a computer, to look into what their kids are doing.
 
Last edited:
I actually started posting here when i was 15 :p

But luckily now i am the Grand age of 18 now :D

Teehee! ^^
 
lol 4chan

You mean e/b/aums, amirite?

Anyhow, I first signed up to ticklingforum.com when I was 16...even wrote some stories on there, which were rather well received. This was a couple of years after when my parents learned how to check the history on the family computer...something at that point I didn't know I could delete. I got out of it by saying they were popups, and suggested getting better anti-virus software as a result. Pretty snappy of me I thought. But then they found me logged on the TT some time later, and my mum got scared and said "you're moving with your auntie and uncle in bel-air". I whistled for a cab and when it came near the license plate said 'fresh' and it had...oh never mind.

The moral is - alot of the 'older' generation are rather good with computers, but they trust the 'younger' generation more, so its easier to blag stuff with them. I'm sorry, I just thought that was an awesome story.
 
I joined the forum around 18 or 19... Can't remember exactly when. I lurked for a while, though. Now I'm 21. ^^ Hurray!

EDIT: Oh, hey, my own profile says I joined in Oct of 2004. I would have been 18 then. ^^
 
Last edited:
Yeah, joined at sixteen here. Good thing I did. I was suicidally depressed:p For the record, I'm 20 now :D

~K
 
Is that true? Your profile says you are 21.

Even if they are telling the truth, their honesty is not to be admired or considered, IMHO.

If they are not telling the truth, which you could not possibly know for sure, then you're merely taking their word for it, which means you're breaking the rules you're supposed to be enforcing if you choose to do nothing or turn a blind eye to what someone is overtly displaying as factual.

I guess the real question, rather, is why this person would willingly admit they are underage knowing that it should get them banned. This then leads one to think whether IP bans are more in order now than ever, these days.
 
I agree 100% with Vladislaus Dracula on this matter. Most stuff, I'm pretty easygoing on, and tend to be pretty silly and downright childish myself at times. BUT, I'm over 40 y.o., and am part of an ADULT forum. I don't want kids around here. I understand that they have legitimate tickling desires and fetishes, just like me. After all, I have had mine my entire life. It's just that, legally speaking, they shouldn't be here, for my sake and theirs.
 
Even if they are telling the truth, their honesty is not to be admired or considered, IMHO.

If they are not telling the truth, which you could not possibly know for sure, then you're merely taking their word for it, which means you're breaking the rules you're supposed to be enforcing if you choose to do nothing or turn a blind eye to what someone is overtly displaying as factual.

I guess the real question, rather, is why this person would willingly admit they are underage knowing that it should get them banned. This then leads one to think whether IP bans are more in order now than ever, these days.

Where I live (and in other jurisdictions as well), a person is legally allowed to rely on the information in a user's profile to determine if that user is a minor. His post contradicted his profile information, so I felt it prudent to inquire as to which of his statements was false. If he had indicated that he were joking in his post, the forum could rely on his profile as displaying his real date of birth.
 
What's New

5/6/2024
Check out Clips4Sale for the webs largest one-stop fetish clip store!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
NEST 2024
Register here
The world's largest online clip store
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top