It's a good question! I'm not in any way put off by the vids with the younger women but as I got older in my late 40's I do find women my age far more attractive. My favorite types are all in the MILF category LOL. No explanation, just like there is no explanation for my love of tickling beautiful female feet.
-
The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us. -
>>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
Don't forget to include your username
The TMF is sponsored by:
Your thoughts about Tickling Clips with 18 & 19 year old girls
- Thread starter mancunian
- Start date
Lord Doctor
4th Level Violet Feather
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2005
- Messages
- 7,885
- Points
- 0
None that I'm aware of.
I'm sort of on the fence with this issue.
On one side of it, yeah, there are very few places that allow pornography at all that don't think that 18 is an acceptable minimum age, best as I know. Morally speaking, I think the Western world has largely accepted that 18 far enough along in life to be able to make some "adult" decisions. To some degree, this is true; it's when you're expected to start making them. The difference between a 17 year old and an 18 year old can be as little as one day. You need to give kids some time to build up experience making these sorts of adult decisions before you let them start making decisions that they might come to regret later, more from the stigma of a porn shoot being discovered by somebody you know than the actual incident itself.
Basically, I feel like 18 year olds are still teenagers. The magical number in the US is 21. By then, you've had at least 3 years of doing stupid shit after highschool under your belt, and have gained some sense of the consequences. I think that anyone concerned for the models involved could probably check their moral burden at this number.
On the flip side, we let people who've just turned 18 make the decision to ship themselves off to shoot guns at other kids who've just turned 18. I mean, if we're setting that age as the one at which we recognize the right to choose to participate in mortal violence (I know this sounds sort of anti-war, but it's not, I'm just stressing the point), then I think that letting people choose to expose some or all of their flesh on camera isn't too big of a leap.
Anyways, if they're at least of legal age and they fit my individual aesthetic sense, I'm all in regardless. For my personal tastes, I've found that all the 'lees that seem to suffer the most are in the 25-35 range, and nothing else about tickling is as important to me as the suffering of the 'lee.
On one side of it, yeah, there are very few places that allow pornography at all that don't think that 18 is an acceptable minimum age, best as I know. Morally speaking, I think the Western world has largely accepted that 18 far enough along in life to be able to make some "adult" decisions. To some degree, this is true; it's when you're expected to start making them. The difference between a 17 year old and an 18 year old can be as little as one day. You need to give kids some time to build up experience making these sorts of adult decisions before you let them start making decisions that they might come to regret later, more from the stigma of a porn shoot being discovered by somebody you know than the actual incident itself.
Basically, I feel like 18 year olds are still teenagers. The magical number in the US is 21. By then, you've had at least 3 years of doing stupid shit after highschool under your belt, and have gained some sense of the consequences. I think that anyone concerned for the models involved could probably check their moral burden at this number.
On the flip side, we let people who've just turned 18 make the decision to ship themselves off to shoot guns at other kids who've just turned 18. I mean, if we're setting that age as the one at which we recognize the right to choose to participate in mortal violence (I know this sounds sort of anti-war, but it's not, I'm just stressing the point), then I think that letting people choose to expose some or all of their flesh on camera isn't too big of a leap.
Anyways, if they're at least of legal age and they fit my individual aesthetic sense, I'm all in regardless. For my personal tastes, I've found that all the 'lees that seem to suffer the most are in the 25-35 range, and nothing else about tickling is as important to me as the suffering of the 'lee.
Given that the legal age in the U.S is 18 and younger in most places I see no harm in it. People that age can choose to join the army if they want, I think they dice to show some skin if they want as well. Whether or not it is the smartest thing for them to do is another debate, but I think at that age they are ready to weigh the pros and cons
a7hgsir4h3jk
Guest
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2014
- Messages
- 2,283
- Points
- 0
That sounds pretty good, actually...
hornyhornet89
Registered User
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2014
- Messages
- 8
- Points
- 1
Seeing as how I myself am 19, I like these clips.
ticklishdanny
TMF Expert
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2012
- Messages
- 480
- Points
- 16
They're only 3 years younger than myself so I'm fine with it, I've dated one girl who is 3 years younger than myself and she loves tickling me, didn't even have to ask her to 
duderino84
2nd Level Orange Feather
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 2,288
- Points
- 38
Friends before or after the videos tho?
On the OP....idk, I mean, it feels kind of odd, but legal is legal I guess. I kind of hate how traditional porn has branded the phrase "BARELY LEGAL!" onto fresh new people but I guess they make their choices. Tickling is tickling. I mean, most of French tickling's material is pretty ....gentlemanly. And the girls are just getting tickled, getting oriented to what they like and what they may not like to return to. Kind of like Last Laugh Productions. There's another company that (for me) made it erotic by just putting the tickling out there. They use good quality models. Much as I like the occasional tickle abuse or tickle intensive video, it's just starting to feel like sex WITH tickling thrown in. Last Laugh and French Tickling remind me of like dating (except I'm not bilingual, so where the hell I pulled that from, who knows.).
tickletherapist
3rd Level Red Feather
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2013
- Messages
- 1,721
- Points
- 38
Age restricting is totally subjective. In some countries girls get married in the age of 14. Sometimes, you woudn't really guess if someone is 16 or 19, nor by looks, nor by intelligence.
What our brain is really concerned about is if it's legal or not. In particular culture that we belong to. It seems weird not to see a 16y.o. person tickled, but to see a person of non-legal age by law for shooting in video. We are so lawful in our minds actually.
I'm not saying if it's wrong or right. It's what it is. And we should just respect the law.
Also, pure tickling and explicit porn get confused much, as they are mixed by pornographic studios.
For me tickling is in itself. If it involves natural beauty of a girl or a boy, genuine emotions, beautiful smiles, laughter, chemistry. And what's more - it's actually healthy and greatly stress releasing. Then what's not good about it?
At most I call it - emotional erotics.
You might remember this definition. Because it's about the beauty of real emotions (as soon as there are no fakers), and pure innocent sexuality.
Because tickling positively develops sexuality, teaches it, to make each other smile and be sensitive. Like having cats teaches kids kinesthetics, so they can touch girls nicely then. It's the better school of touch than fighting in the streets and pulling braids.
What our brain is really concerned about is if it's legal or not. In particular culture that we belong to. It seems weird not to see a 16y.o. person tickled, but to see a person of non-legal age by law for shooting in video. We are so lawful in our minds actually.
I'm not saying if it's wrong or right. It's what it is. And we should just respect the law.
Also, pure tickling and explicit porn get confused much, as they are mixed by pornographic studios.
For me tickling is in itself. If it involves natural beauty of a girl or a boy, genuine emotions, beautiful smiles, laughter, chemistry. And what's more - it's actually healthy and greatly stress releasing. Then what's not good about it?
At most I call it - emotional erotics.
You might remember this definition. Because it's about the beauty of real emotions (as soon as there are no fakers), and pure innocent sexuality.
Because tickling positively develops sexuality, teaches it, to make each other smile and be sensitive. Like having cats teaches kids kinesthetics, so they can touch girls nicely then. It's the better school of touch than fighting in the streets and pulling braids.
