This is sort of.. on topic. As it is about baseball.
Did anyone happen to buy or read the 2011 Sporting News Baseball preview magazine that came out this week? The magazine had an article which proposed an interesting idea.
Supposedly, there is discussion about expanding the playoffs to include two extra teams, in each league, as soon as the 2012 season. The article floats several ideas. One idea proposed would be a one game, winner take all, sudden death game, and another, is a three game series, with the winner of that series, advancing.
In 1995, when baseball expanded the playoffs to include the wild card, I was in favor of it. (I'm not just saying this because the Braves won the wild card last year, and have a shot for it this year. Remember, at the time it happened, the Braves were in the middle of their division titles streak). I think the idea of extra teams is exciting, as the playoffs is always a crapshoot. We've already had an all wild card World Series, and.. wild card teams have already won a few championships.
Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing the playoffs expanded. The problem is weather concerns. If the postseason is pushed deeper into November.. there is worry about the possibility of extremely cold temps, or winter precipitation for night games, in places like Boston, New York, Philly, etc. They have floated the idea of perhaps shortening the regular season schedule to the old pre 1960s one of 154 games, to accomodate extra playoff dates. However, doing such would mean each team would have only 77 home dates a year instead of the current 81, and doing such might mean a significant loss of revenue for teams, especially teams like the Yankees, who draw large crowds every night.
If they do expand the playoffs, I hope they decide to use a format where the extra playoff series involved would be a three game series, rather than a one game, winner take all game. This would keep the playing field more level. Say, for example, a team needs to pitch it's ace in the regular season finale, because their regular season finale will determine if they make the playoffs or not. A three game series, with travel days, would ensure that their ace would definitely get to pitch during the series in a possible elimination game, thus making the idea fair for all teams involved. If a team has to pitch its ace in Game 162, and wins that game, but then has to face a winner take all game, with only one chance to win, two days later, the ace won't be able to pitch again. A three game series is more condusive, it would seem, to determine the fate of a team advancing.
Did anyone else hear about this idea, or read this article? Thoughts on it, if any?
Mitch