• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year.
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

A sensible Discussion on the existence of the "Illuminati"

Aw, by that logic, everything you buy imposes an order. Commercial purchase does such.

Personally, I dig the notion of stayin' outta caves and wood hovels. Would take VERY little time to be without the resources to live comfortably, given the natural war-like tendencies that have proven themselves in our species, over and over.

Say, d'ya think that the big I oppressed BigJim so he'd stop outting them? 😉

The topic still fascinates me, as conspiracy theories oft do. It's one o' them puzzle-in-a-puzzle deals...
 
Illuminati, are there any left?

Dave has some good stuff on this the other day:

“If I understand the Society of Freemasons correctly (at whose head resides said alleged Illuminati), there IS a code of silence regarding the specifics of the higher orders.
As the Illuminati are believed, from outside the Freemasons, as being the head of that group, and, outside, are a hidden caste of that society, it's not surprising that not much about them is known.”

“There is a way to learn - join the Freemasons and avail yourself to rise to the higher echelons. “



I attended a fascinating lecture on the 1st of February given by Lon Milo Duquette, who at the present time is not merely a good magician (in the ‘olde’ sense) but the likely sitting heir to the Ordo Templi Orientis, once Breeze either kicks or abdicates. OTO was hinted to have contained the remnants of a few German Illuminati around the turn of the century, before the illustrious “beast” himself Aleister Crowley took over. What surprised me, was when Lon mentioned that in his area, Bay area of California, most of the new members of the Freemasons are hailing from the ranks of the OTO! At one point in history (early 20th c.), neither order would have likely invited any of the “others” in.

Do the Freemasons have any Illuminati inside their own; or even know if they have any? I don’t know. I think it’s a bit unlikely. From what I’ve gathered, the term, Illuminati somehow rose or was discovered in the mid 19th century, in both Germany and France, both seeming to have cross pollinated each others lodges and groups with Illuminism thought. Yet within a short 100 years or so the term, at least to identify a particular membership, seems to have fallen out of favor. Were there those who still thought of themselves as Illuminati? Probably, but along with holding actual memberships and affiliations within at least named and recognized, even if semi underground and “irregular” or renegade groups of defrocked Masons!

In France it was Pasqually, then later Willermoz, and finally “Papus” or Gerard Encausse; in Germany it was Weishaupt and Von Hund. Many of the Brit and US Masons, of the deeply occult and mystical bent, seemed to have barely clung to their Masonic lodge affiliations, Yarker, Blitz, Westcott, etc.

But I can’t answer all or really many questions with authority, as I’ve never been a Mason, but I’ve known a few. No, I think the answers since the end of the last century tend to lie outside of regular Freemasony.


Then Jim added:

“Problem being Dave, once you reach the top (33rd Degree in the case of the Sacred Scottish Rite) you've had 20 or 30 years of training (indoctrination) in doing things to the "agenda's" line. On top of which, by the time you've got that high your job, pension, liveliehood etc will be in the power of people who've got your nuts in a G-clamp.”



This is right-on. The Freemasons, I do believe, all the way up their lineage, and even if they do go to the top of the degree ladders, adhere to the traditional histories, mythos, and objectives of their ‘fraternity’. In many cases the adventures of the lodges in France and Germany that were –expelled- in the period about 1780 to about 1860, shocked and almost frightened many good Masonic brothers.

”I'd like to re-itterate here, that the Freemasons aren't THE Illuminate. They're just one organisation through which they work. (If you believe they exist of course.)”



Agreed again. Some of todays FM’s could easily hold membership in traditional lodges and also join many various and sundry “irregular” groups, as well as almost any fringe “new age” following going today. There are of course likely to be some practicing their more occult explorations in the form of “solitaries”.

The Illuminati’s are then not so much as an order, or an organization of any kind. I believe that many folks who have attached to some of the various esoteric bodies in the Western Occult swarm, probably do at least “think” of themselves as illuminates, but simply to say they follow “illuminist beliefs”.

And more, “they” themselves seem to have no inclination for conspiracy or motivations of any worldly empowering nature. The conspiracy theorists, and they’ve been around since about the time of the French Revolution, do love to point blame for a dark, secret, manifest, and unified conspiracy just being continually laid by these sinister Illuminati. Probably one of the most recent and most lurid of these was Robert Anton Wilson with his “Illuminati Trilogy” written about 1976. It’s a fabulous read, but altogether one of the most convoluted pieces of comedic sci-fi of this century.

Now, … all this being said, do I still believe there is “a” or are “some” conspiracies that underlay known socio-political and cultural structures of the West? Yes indeed. The trickiest thing about it, from what I’ve surmised is that even the most knowledgable, such as the elements of the notorious Prieure de Sion (if you believe they exist), a very precious few members of the “College of (Vatican) Cardinals”; e.g. Josef Ratzinger, and perhaps some of the most astute investigators of Western Occultism have glimpses of some of these darkest and most gravely kept secrets. And I also surmise that they hold the impact and weight of each other’s secrets in a perilous balance, that if any of them revealed to the public the mass of secret that they held (and providing they could get the public to believe them), that Western society as we know it would collapse like a house of cards.

I believe it is for this reason, plus that most academics (and traditional Freemasons) have been so trained, so acclimated to believe the specific set of traditions that are accepted as “fact” in the West, that very very few have come that close to any of these hypotheses that may turn everything upside down.

There is a fascinating Yahoo group that recently shifted itself (last week or so) to a non-Yahoo server, so as to finally get some control over things, that has a lot of great material along these lines, and anyone can pose any questions they’d like to open discussion. It’s “Antiquities of the Illuminati”, and I’ll see if I can locate the new server URL for the group.

Spenser

Anyone reading, in addition to Dave and Jim, who’d like to write also, my e-mail address is:

[email protected]
 
I like your point about the G-Clamp. That's what it is all about. Order. All orders are them same ultimately.
 
Hello Guys ,
i also heard about the "Iluminati" and it reminds my on some Mysteries about the History of my Country Germany.I'm talking about "Odessa" or "Commando Werwolf",for those who don't know what whi I mean "Odessa" is said to be a Big Nazi Society Operating over the whole world with the main target to gain Power with a new Leader someday.Commando Werwolf is a bigger Mysterie,it is said to be a Secret SS-Society founded only by former SS-Member ,thats the difference to "Odessa",with the target to create a new SS that will conquer the world..There are rumors about Camps in South-America but it was never proofed,some other believes that there could be a hide-out at the South-Pole or North-Pole but it was never proofed,too..Some other said the "Phantom" Class Submarine would be a proof,Phantom because of the German Submarine that were found at the atlantic next to New York ,but there were no papers or something written about the submarine from the Nazis in Germany. The submarine was build to stay long-time at the Pole-Region.
If I hear about stuff like that ,it reminds me ,at the Office of Fox Mulder in the Basement, about the Poster at the wall with the Fying saucer and the Title : "I WANT TO BELIEVE "
This is how i feel about it
 
del said:
Nice topic but I'm a bit late.

In my observation, the strange thing is everything we enjoy in this world has been created by people who have imposed order of some kind.
The illiminati probably think they are doing the human race a favour by working to create world order.

Possibly they do, but if they do, it's beside the point. Even if they didn't believe it they'd still do it. The whole point of their existence over the years has been to safeguard the reign of power and secrecy for themselves. Those who are at the top of the Illuminate chain, probably believe they are living gods.

I think there are some misinterpretations when people assosciate the word "Illuminate" with Bavaria or France and Germany in the 19th century. Certainly there was/is an organisation called the Bavarian Illuminate; but when I use the word I refer to the people at the very top of everything that features in our daily lives. (And thus has a part to play in controlling us.) That means banking, politics, the military, television, radio, fast food joints etc. ( I can't picture Ronald MacDonald in a Shriner fez though! 😱 ) It's a very loose term that just indicates that someone is privy to knowledge that normal people aren't. People tend to think of Freemasons straightaway when the think of the "I word", but the Masons are no more influential than TV in our lives. (As an organisation I mean. You can depend upon it that Conrad Black and Rupert Murdoch are both very high degree!) Steve did get upset by a remark that Biggles made about Shriners and Masons, but neither of Steve's relatives were anywhere near being close to Illuminate functionaries. Both of them were far too lowly ranked in the organisation to have any effect on world politics.

The sad thing is, there is much more about this subject to tell than I or anyone else has written on this thread; but talking about that sort of stuff is more than likely to get it censored or destroy any credibility in the minds of anyone un-illuminated.
 
As I think I mentioned in another thread, religion is one of the biggest tools of mind conrtol and theft of spirituality in the world. It's ruined and ended billions of lives over the centuries and if you believe in the "Illuminate", then it's been their biggest and most effective servant ever. Sadly, just about every religion in the world is based on absoloute shite and is mostly provably so. In another forum on the net, I wrote an extensive series of articles about this, based on a lot of research I've done and books I've read. Here is the URL for the thread in question. My username is BigJim there too. The forum is one that promotes spirituality and is based in the UK, although there are a lot of members from around the world too. If you're curious to know about how religion has been used by the "Illuminate" to further their own ends and to no good for the mass of humanity, then check it out.

http://www.spiritjourney.co.uk/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=829

---------------------------------


The first two posts by me in this thread has been reproduced below, to start you off.

BigJim: I've been thinking about putting this thread up for weeks now. I've procrastinated for various reasons, but I've finally gotten my backside in gear and done it.

I would like to hear everyone's thoughts on religion. (As opposed to spirituality.) I had a long discussion with GenesGal98 on Yahoo about this very subject the other night, and I would guess that most people who've known me from the chat room or these forums, would find my opinions and views pretty shocking. (Because I have an obvious spiritual side to me, but a very negative view of religion.)

Two or three people I've discussed it with in the chat room have expressed interest in this sort of thread, so here it is. Most people here would consider themselves spiritual, without being pigeon-holed into any particular religion, I would say. Even so there are many here who believe in the stories of Jesus Christ walking among men and doing his works. What do you all think about Him? Do you believe in him? What are your thoughts and opinions? What about your conception of God, or the 12 disciples of Christ? Do you think they were real "flesh and blood" men, or mythical figures?

Anything and everything you care to write about what you think would be invaluable. I myself have been researching religion and spirituality for 3 or 4 years and there's a lot of material I'd like to share with you all. I would like to hear everyone else's opinions first though.


BigJim: Okay, who am I talking about here? His father was the king of the spirit world/heaven. He was the only begotten son of the chief deity. He was born of a virgin as a result of an immaculate conception. He was born on earth on December 25th and walked among men as a great king. He was a threat to the established order of the time. He was brutally murdered, laid dead in his tomb for 3 days and then came back to life. He reapeared to his followers and then ascended to rule the heavens at the side of his holy father.

Sounds like a simple question I'm sure. I'm even more sure that every one of you would answer that I was talking about Jesus Christ. However, you would'nt be correct. All of the above have been attributed to an almost endless string of deities, of whom Jesus Christ is only one of the most recent. A few years ago, the Archbishop of Canterbury objected to having a Christmas tree in the cathedral because it was a pagan symbol. What makes that so funny is that the whole of the Christian religion is pagan! And not just christianity either. Islam, Hinduism, Bhuddism, Judaism and just about every pre-christianity multi-theistic religion are all exactly the same. They all tell exactly the same story about exactly the same characters. The only difference is the names they give them. Now you might think that would be a perfect corroberation of official religious history, but again you would'nt be right. For millenia now, religion has been nothing (according to what I've studied) but a forcible hi-jacking of human spirituality; for the purpose of controlling masses of people by fear and guilt. The figures you'd read about in just about any religious story are at the very best, loosely based on real people. Often they are flat out fictional and nothing more. What is even worse is that a slightly different version of events has been peddled to different peoples, with the express intention of making sure they hate anyone else who doesn't share their own desperatley limited vision.

To understand where the blueprint for control by religion came from, you have have to look very closely at the oldest pagan religions, of ancient civilisations. The main focus for these was the sun. Whether it was Apollo, Ammon-Ra, Helios, Sol Invictus or whoever, the sun god was always highly venerated because the sun was so important. There were two reasons for this. Firstly it was because of the obvious dependancy of civilisation upon the sun. It provided warmth and light; was directly responsible for how good the harvest would be. In all these ancient civilisations you had a trinity. A chief god, a female and a son figure, who walked amongst mortal men. In ancient Babylon these three were called Nimrod, Semiramis and their son, Tammuz. Tammuz was a "great king amongst men". He was murdered in his 30's by being hung on a tree with a lamb at his feet. They laid his corpse in a tomb and 3 days later the tomb was found open, with the body gone! I've definatley heard that somewhere before...........

And the thing is, that this supposedly happened five to six thousand years BC!!!!!! As time passed there was the same theme in Egypt. There the trinity was Osiris, Isis and Horus. Osiris had an evil broher rebel against him in heaven (called Set or Seth) who murdered him. His sister Isis miraculously conceived a son by him, ressurected him and then bore the infant called Horus. This Horus chap was called a saviour, ruled amongst men, cast down the evil Set and restored his father's kingdom on earth. Horus also had 12 followers and was refered to as "the Kryst". (sp?) Everything that dated from Babylon and Sumer from about 6,000-7,500 BC miraculously transported itself across to Egypt for the Pharohonic period. The legends were identical, butthe names had changed. On a completely different landmass in Central America, you had an identical situation with Queztalcoatl and Tezcatlipoca. But there's more............

In Phrygia there was born a "Son of the gods" called Attis. He was born on December the 25th to a virgin mother. He was refered to as "the Saviour of men, the only begotten Son" and he died to save humanity. He was "crucified" on a Friday and his blood was spilled to redeem the earth. He suffered "death with nails and stakes". He was the Father and Son combined in a human body. He was laid to rest, went down into the underworld, but three days later on the equivalent of March 25th, his body was found missing. Later on, he was found walking about again. His body was symbolised as bread, which was eaten by his followers as a sign of taking him into themselves.

In India there was a godling called Krishna. He was born to a virgin mother on December 25th. His father was a carpenter. A star hovered over his birthplace and there were shepherds and angels of heaven there. The local ruler slaughtered thousands of infants to try to eradicate him, buthe somehow survived. He performed miracles, healed lepers, the sick, the lame and the blind. He died in his 30's, crucified on a tree or post. His close followers refered to him as "Jezeus" or "Jeseus" which translates as "pure essence". It is said in the writing of the Vedas that he will return on a white horse to judge the dead and fight the "Prince of Evil".

Then in Greece there was Dionysus/Bacchus. He was born to a virgin mother on December 25th; put in a manger and covered in swaddling. He was a teacher who travelled throughout the land performing miracles and healing. He turned water into wine. He rode into town on the back of an ass. (As did Seth from Egypt, funnily enough.) His monikers included the ram or lamb, God if the Vine, God of Gods and King of Kings, Only Begotten Son, bearer of sins, the Redeemer, the Anointed One (translated frmo the word "Christos") and the Alpha and the Omega. He was hung and crucified on a tree, but rose from the dead on March the 25th. He was worshipped in Jerusalem during the first century BC. A book called Antiquity Unveiled by J.M. Roberts says that "IES, the Phoenician name for Bacchus, offers the origin to Jesus." This chap reckonsthat IES can be broken up into I (meaning "the One") and ES. (Meaning fire and light.) When these two fragments are amalgamated then, it becomes IES which means "the one light". He then says, "This is none other than the light of St. John's Gospel; and this name is to be found everywhere on christian altars, both protestant and catholic,thus clearly showing that the Christian religion is but a modification of Oriental sun worship, attributed to Zoroaster. The Christians read the same letters "IHS" in the Greek text as "Jes" and the Roman Catholic priesthood added the terminus "us". "

And again, it doesn't finish there. Here is a slightly more complete list of deities and demi-deities, all of whom had similar or identical lives to "Jesus", or were involved in legends around the figure. Apollo, Hercules and Zeus of Greece; Adad and Marduk of Assyria; Buddha Sakia and Indra of India and Tibet; Salivahana of southern India and Bermuda; Osiris and Horus of Egypt; Balder and Frey of Scandinavia; Crie of Chaldea; Zoroaster of Persia; Baal (also known as Bel or Bil) and Taut of Phoenicia; Bali of Afghanistan; Jao of Nepal; Wittoba of Bilingonese; Xamolxis of Thrace; Zoar of the Bonzes; Chu Chulainn of Ireland; Deva Tat, Codom and Sammonocadam of Siam; Alcides of Thebes; Mikado of the Sintoos; Beddru of Japan; Hesus or Eros and Bremrillaham of the Druids; Thor, son of Odin of the Gauls; Cadmus of Greece; Hil and Feta of Mandaites; Gentaut and Quetzalcoatl of Mexico and Central America; Universal Monarch of the Sibyls; Ischy of Formosa; Divine Teacher of Plato; Holy One of Xaca; Fohi, Ieo, Lao-Kium, Chiang-Ti and Tien of China; Ixion and Quirnus of Rome; Prometheus of the Caucasus region; Mohammed or Mahomet of Arabia (only true Prophet, rather than Son); Dahzbog of the Slavs; Jupiter, Jove and Quirinus of Rome; Mithra of India, Persia and Rome.

The worship of the god Mithra pre-dates Christianity by literally millenia, but yet again tells the story that would later become Christianity in acute detail. It is even said that gold, frankincense and myrhh were offered as gifts to him. By the time that the character of Jesus was literally invented, the worship of Mithra and his rites were widespread throughou the Roman Empire. When they founded Christianity in Rome, they used the very symbols and rituals that had been the Mythric myth. Mithra's holy day of the week was Sun-day, because like Jesus he wasn't a real person, but a symbol that represents the sun. Mitra's followers called this "the Lord's day" and they celebrated their main religious feast on what is now Easter in our calender. Mithric initiations were held in a cave adorned with the signs of Capricorn and Cancer, being symbols of the winter and summer solstices. He was portrayed as a winged lion (a solar symbol or depiction in a lot of lands) standing within the coils of a spiralling serpent. The lion and serpent are and have been major symbols of power, religion and royalty all across the world, throughout the ages that humans have existed. The Roman church absorbed the Mithra Eucharist into it's rituals and supplanted the whole religion in that region. Mithra was also recorded as saying......"He who shall not eat of my body nor drink of my blood, so that he may be one with me and I with him, shall not be saved." Now that rings a very loud bell to me. The very site that the Vatican stands on was a massive site of Mithra worship. In a way it still is; they just re-named him Jesus.

So Mithra was a symbol for the sun and so was his christian counterpar, Jesus. (The light of the world.) Jesus walks on water. (So does the sun's reflection if you want to get picky. lol) Jesus started his Father's work in the temple at the age of 12 and started his main ministry at 30. (The sun reaches it's daily peak at 12 noon, hence Jesus was first known then, and it enters each zodiacal sign at 30 degrees, hence he starts his ministry at that age.) Jesus turned water into wine. (At the root of nature the sun does the same because it makes the vine grow.) There is soooooo much symbolism in these accounts and not least in the bible itself; which is almst entirely pure symbolism. There are the fish, (Pisces) and the 12 disciples (sign of the zodiac) to name just two. To understand that last one, look at a picture of Da Vinci's painting "The Last Supper." We are very much talking two levels of knowledge here. In the most basic form, the people worshipped the sun because of it's effect on the crop; but the people in the know who were doing the manipulating worshipped it because they understood it's power over nature entirely. This is where we start talking about secret societies and conspiracy theories I'm afraid. Leonardo Da Vinci was very high up as an initiate of secret societies as they existed in his day, and he certainly understood what Jesus really was. When you look at that painting, you can see Jesus sitting in the centre and the 12 disciples gathered with 6 on either side of Him. Look even closer and you'll notice that the 12 disciples are gathered in 4 groupd of 3 men. (They're actually huddled into these groups pretty obviously, so it isn't too hard to spot if you're looking for it.) The painting is wholly symbolic of the sun (Son) surrounded by the 12 signs of he zodiac! The reason they're gathered in 4 groups of three is because they symbolise the 4 seasons of the year, with three months in each one.

then let's take the Pisces and fish symbolism even further. Jesus was refered to as the "fish" and the "fisher of men". Perhaps this may have been because at the time that he was alleged to have been born, the Earth was entering the sign of Pisces. Because there is so much symbolism for Jesus and all the other gods assosciated with similar tales througout history, we really can't afford to ignore any possible connection with fish-like or amphibious gods, of ancient peoples. The Nommo of the Dogon people and also the Annedoti were both like this. also, their respective worshipers claimed hey came from the star we call Sirius. (When you look at my profile, you'll begin to understand how I gravitated towards this area of research.)The Dogon people said that the amphibious Nommo had told them that one of their own would be "crucified" too.

And here's another part that makes a nonsense of religion. The most widely used, translated and debated version of the Bible, is the King James version. A survey by the church in the 19th century discovered that the KJB had, wait for it............NEARLY 40,000 TRANSLATION ERRORS!!!!! One of the most noticable of these errors was the translation of the word "Elohim". This was taken to be the singular "God". However the word for God was "Elo". The h-i-m part pluralises it, which means that the bible should have been refering to "the gods" instead of "God". Big difference. This makes more sense when you try to compare Christianity, Islam and Judais which all have the same roots, with the much older, multi-theistic, pagan religions. (It also makes "the Son of God" into "the sons of the gods". Perhaps that refers to the Nephilim of the book of Genesis?) Another big-time translation error was the translation of "the end of the world". (Armagheddon.) The word for world was mistranslated from the Greek word " aeon" and refers to the end of an age, not the whole world. The "end of the age" refers to the earth astronomical/astrological progression from one sign of the zodiac to the other. We are soon to leave the age of Pisces and enter the age of Aquarius. I think this progression more or less syncs with the Mayan's prediction of the end of the age/world as they knew it in 2012. Expect big changes soon then! Perhaps this is why people are beginning to discover their spiritual abilities again, instead of living in fear and guilt?

The deeds attributed to Jesus christ are huge and momentous. Someone like him would have been a serious thorn in the side of whoever held the reigns of power at the time He lived. However, not all seems to gel on this point. Outside of the books of the New Testament, there is no record, sign or account of Jesus Christ anywhere. A brief mention in the words of a Hebrew scholar/historian called Josephus is a rather blatant and obvious attempt at the priesthood trying to cross reference their meal ticket. There are literally scores of writers, historians and philosophers who laid down the history of the Israel/Palestine area at the time Jesus is said to have lived and NOT ONE OF THEM mentions him in so much as a footnote. Philo was alive and kicking through Jesus' whole "life" and wrote extensivley about the Judeans. This covered the whole period. The man lived in or near to Jerusalem all througout the time that Jesus was born of immaculate conception, wowed the elders in the temple, performed miracles and healings,overturned he money lenders tables, drove out demons, nearly gave the local authorities multiple heart attacks, was crucified, returned to life and ascended to heaven. Quite a life. And what does Philo say about this larger than life character, who so dominated his time and place? That's less likely than Mike Tyson turning vegetarian. It is exactly the same with all the very complete roman records, and the work of all of Philo's prominent contempories. There is no simple answer, just a very blunt one from my perspective. These events never happened, because there was no "Jesus". The man himself is symbolic of the sun, and his deeds and miracles are symbolic of the sun's power because of it's importance in pagan religion. And the main reaosn that the hierarchy of these religions worshipped the sun, wasn't because of it's effect on the crop, although that is very important, obviously. It was because they understood the power of the sun's electromagnetism. After light and heat, this is the sun's most effective power on our planet. The sun is quite simply, boiling with electromagnetism. The earth itself it crisscrossed with electromagnetic meridians that were known as "ley lines" in the olden days. On top of that, every living cell on the planet is a conductor of electromagnetic energy. Now this is the power that makes that train in France levitate!!!!! Electromagnetism can do that! It can also transfer information via an electromagnetic wave through the air. Military communication do this all the time. (At least EXTREMELY important ones do.) Now if you can picture a human being who is so in tune with this process that his or her body can channel the energy in the same way that a train or transmitter does; you have scientific explanations for telekinesis and telepathy! Not myth! Not science fiction! Not hogwash! FACT! The sun vastly affects the earth's meridian grid all the time. Whenever two or more of these meridians cross each other, you get a vortex point of seriously intense energy. It's also at places like this that you'll find monuments like Stonehenge, Avebury, the Giza plateau and the temple at Ankhor Wat in south east Asia. These things were massive harnessing focuses for the earth's natural powers! So why havn't we still got them today? you might ask. We have. They're all over the world at points where energy meridians meet. And what's more they're even designed after the fashion of the old esoteric structures, because every shape has a vibration and a wavelength that affects this energy. Egypt is the most ready example to hand. The male energy was represented by an obelisk, symbolic of the penis of Osiris; which was severed by Seth's sword. The female energy was represented by a dome or bowl, symbolic of Isis's womb. Typical male/female energy representations. these symbols were the focused representations of the manipulated energy; the natural energy itself was often depicted as a river. Hence the Egyptians would often build an obelisk on one side of the Nile and a symbol of Isis on the other. Well one of the biggest "vortex points" in europe is in the British Isles, under the City of London. Now get this......near Oxford, the Thames river is refered to as "the Isis". Coincidence? Possibly. But follow it into the city and then stop when we get to the financial district. On one side of the river you have Canary Wharf, the biggest obelisk in the country and right across the river from it, (a stones throw almost exactly) you have the Millenium Dome. In the space of a few hundred square yards you have the river, the obelisk and the dome. The trinity. The father, mother and the product. Massive symbolism on a scarily modern scale. Why the hell would modern architects be following designs practiced in ancient Egypt? I would suggest the answer is because the people who designed the damn things knew perfectly what they represented. What we're talking about is knowledge on two levels, all over again! And I can feel the "I word" coming up pretty soon.

When I use the term "Illuminate" I'm not talking about any one group, or society. I'm refering to all of them as a whole. The whole upshot of this thread, is that these people knew the power of nature and the cosmos. If it's a power that gives normal, ordinary people the sort of abilities that this forum was created to promote, then it would frighten people who had created religion after religion on pure symbolism, and murdered anyone who didn't take it literally. Some of the people here are religious in the conventional sense. That's fine, I don't decry that at all. But when you get to the bare bones of any of the major religions, you see nothing but hate, murder, racism, damnation and fear. According to the Bible itself, the biggest and mosr prolific racist and biggot of them all was God Himself! It makes me damn angry to think that someone could twist Divine Spirit into such a horrible mis-representation. The people here who believe in Jesus, but promote the values of this forum, (patience, tolerance, pychic ability etc) are wonderful people, but don't fit the original mould of religion at all. It was the character called Jesus Himself who said "I come not to bring peace, but a sword!" Conventional religion was a deliberate creation. It was created to imprison humanity and disconnect it from it's infinte power and possibility. That's why so many poor sould were murdered in the name of "God". But it's ending, the stranglehold is breaking. The people who use this forum are the proof of that. Humanity as a whole can hear the ticking of some cosmic, spiritual alarm clock, that is waking them up. I think personally that is why so many people who think of themselves as christians (including me about 3 years ago) do not fit the description at all.

Before I sign off from this mammoth thread, here is one more point about Jesus the Son/sun of God/the gods that I would like to make. As is widely accepted, the sun was the focus of ancient religion and as I've said I believe, Jesus is symbolic of it; not a factual person. Well one of the biggest holy days of any pagan calender was the winter solstice. It was the holiest because it was the end of one solar year nd the start of the next. On December 21st-22nd the sun had reached it's nadir in the northern hemisphere. (Where most ancient civillisations were located.) The ancients said it had "died". By even the most rudimentary of observations/calculations it had begun it's journey back to life and it's full summer strength, by the time 3 days had passed. The pagan/ancients would then have a massive celebration of the sun's rebirth on their calender's equivalent of December the 25th. So let's re-cap...........
1/ The sun/Son dies.........
2/ It spends three days dead or in the underworld.......
3/ It then is re-born/born anew........
4/ And the sun's birthday would then have been on.........DECEMBER 25TH!!!!

That is why symbolic deity after symbolic deity was born on that date; in civilisation after civilisation; millenium after millenium. That is why christianity took all the festival dates from the pagan calender and that is why the Archbishop of Canterbury dropped a clanger when he said Christmas trees were pagan. Christianity IS pagan!

If you got to the end of this post, then congratulations! It took me the best part of two and a half hours to write, and it's totally bushed me. lol I would like to hear your thoughts on all of this, especially those of you who would consider yourselves religious in the conventional sense. There is more information in my head about more specific things, but I can't write any more in one post. If anyone has any questions they'd like to ask, please feel free. If I've come across anything that might be able to answer them, I'll be happy to oblige. What you've just read is the product of about 4 years deep research into every book and paper I could find on the subject. I've read everything from the sublime to the ridiculous. I've gone through authors like Robert Bauval, Maurice Cotterell, David Icke, Diane Stein, Diana Cooper and others I'm too tired to remember now. Some sound credible, some sound dopey and air-headed; but I read them anyway to see if there was anything there. Most of what I learned on religion is included so far, but if there's anything else that anyone wants to know about, please ask.
 
WHO IS REALLY ON THE LEVEL?

CHAOS (Male) opens the way for female
There has always been and will always be a battle between civil behaviour and individual freedom. Anybody who is against order is a fool and will be crushed by the strength of the mass sooner or later as it is well said that "no man is wiser than a city".

ORDER (Female) creates the desire for Male
On the other hand it is so sad and indeed painful to see people completely robbed of their individuality because they are completely blind and cannot see the control systems they are a part of. These people are Zombies. Zombies exist and have always existed. Zombies build beautiful things. If you survive by doing something you do not want to do you are a Zombie. That's just the way it goes.


THE WISE
There are a few who fully understand the balance between the 2 and move between Order and Chaos at will. These people deserve to be at the top because they have no hang ups and understand human nature completely.


I hope I get that knowledge before I'm old. Then again maybe it is not possible as I have read in both ancient and mordern writings that there are stages to life and you have to be superhuman to transcend stages without blowing your mind.
 
Last edited:
Hi BigJim ,
i like your topics very much and i would like to show you my Point of View about Religion.I'm an Atheist and I like Philosophie very much
I think that Religion itself changed and turned into Ways and Forms ,that was not good for Religion.
What I mean f.E.that Christianity in former times has nothing to do with what the katholic Church did during the middel ages.
Today and during the middel ages Religion became a Tool of Power and Control of people and with it ,it lost its purpose.
I for myself can understand why people want to believe in Jesus or a God.
1.)Psychologically said : Mankind is always looking for Excuses for their actions , they don't want to take responsibilty for it.
And Jesus is a good excuse ,because he suffered for every sin and B_shit people are doing.That means I can do everything and with one Pray to god or jesus it's done,it's very easy and Comfortable isn't it ?

2.)Like the first argument people are lying their lives into hands of Beings they don't know ,than they try to live a good life for those beings but obviously they are doing it for themselves without knowing it and they feel very good about it.This is what Marx meant with "Religion is Opium for the people."

3.) It makes us easier to explain our Race and the behavior of the race and to catalogalize Behavior Norms.
 
I guess we differ on spiritual views NoobSaibot, because I'm not an atheist. I am a spiritual person, but I believe that as soon as you put an "ism", "ist" or "ianity" on the end of yourself, you are limiting yourself to believe within the strictures of a particular dogma. Even atheism is included in this, because there's no room for movement.

As for behavioural norms, well setting them is how the Illuminate manage to manipulate us so easilly. All they have to do is make the common people of one race or country hate the common people of another race or country and Bob's your uncle. They're doing it right now with the conflict in the Middle East. We are supposed to hate Iraq because Saddam is a loony, militant muslim and is on the side of Osama; helping him with arms and funds etc. (Not to mention being a general pain in the arse with his own weapons.) The problem with that little scenario is that Osama and Saddam are not, and never will be allies. To be frank the two of them hate each other's guts. They could no more be allies than Reverend Ian Paisley and Gerry Adams from Northern Ireland could be. Both are Christians, so they should be allies and best buddies right? Of course not! Adams is catholic and Paisley is protestant, so they hate each other's guts. Osama and Saddam enjoy a similar relationship; but you won't hear that on CNN (Claptrap No News) because it's owned and run by Illuminate front-men like Tony O'Riley and Rupert Murdoch. You won't read it in the Washington Post either because Mary Whatshername who owns it is a member of the Bilderberg Group, and so is controlled by people like the Rockerfellers and the Gettys, who also are superior to every US president in living history. In the near-ish future I'll have a shit-load of information about the 9/11 attrocities too. I doubt it will do much for anyone who's let themselves be manipulated into thinking that Saddam and Osama are best mates, but bollocks, I'm going to put it up anyway. Information is information and anyone can do what hey like with it.
 
Re: WHO IS REALLY ON THE LEVEL?

del said:
Anybody who is against order is a fool and will be crushed by the strength of the mass sooner or later

That's all very well, but there's a difference between a just order that genuinely keeps the peace of civillisation, and a fascist or communist regime that masquerades as democracy.
 
Re: Re: WHO IS REALLY ON THE LEVEL?

BigJim said:


That's all very well, but there's a difference between a just order that genuinely keeps the peace of civillisation, and a fascist or communist regime that masquerades as democracy.

Well, some people might say the USA nearly fits your description of an ideal world goverment. From what you say the USA needs to get much bigger and more powerful to pass the criterior of an "order that genuinely keeps the peace of civillisation".
 
Spooky $#@&, no?

Frankly, you guys are prolly gonna have mysterious accidents, all boldly talkin' about the Invisible Hands that REALLY run everything, behind the scenes. Yuppers. Gonna get disappeared by The Man. Nice knowin' ya, guys.🙄 😉 :blaugh:

Anybody remember that Illuminati card game from Steve Jackson Games? That was fun. Yeah, too much X-Files, my ass. They're out there. And what better disinformation than to mock the possibility of their existance? Conspiracy Theory? Dark cabals, meeting in secret places with funny hats and signet rings and secret handshakes? LoL "You're Paranoid!", they say. Suuuuuuuurrrrrrrrrre I am. The best trick the devil ever played was convincing the world that he didn't exist. Okay, so I'm rambling. It's after midnight, and my caffiene is wearing off. 😛
 
Re: Re: Re: WHO IS REALLY ON THE LEVEL?

del said:


Well, some people might say the USA nearly fits your description of an ideal world goverment. From what you say the USA needs to get much bigger and more powerful to pass the criterior of an "order that genuinely keeps the peace of civillisation".


Whaaaaaaaaaaat?????? The USA is nothing like a conception of my ideal world government. Every time there's a presidential election, the voters are given two candidates who were selected by the people with the real power,(as that much laughed at author, David Icke has said, they are selected by blood, not elected by ballot) are related to each other and the British and other European royal families. Dubya and Gore the Bore were cousins of each other, Prince Charles and Queen Liz and can both trace their geneaology back further than Charlemagne and Alfred the Great! That ain't true democracy, it's an elected dictatorship! It parades as a government for the people, by the people yada yada yada, but it ain't even close to being that.

The system that most wesern people have been conned into believeing they have is a very good one, but sadly they're being deluded; they don't have the system they think they have, or anything like it. But a slave will not complain about his captivity, if he believes he is free will he? The USA has had hundreds of millions of people live in it, since 1789 when George Washington was elected the first president. And all those people came from a fantastically diversified genetic background. The USA had people of all races, creeds, religions and colours from day one. You would have thought therefore that there might be a bit of genetic diversity in the people who were elected as it's leader? Nope, not a bit of it. Of the 44 (I think it's 44?) people who've been elected president, 35 have been closely related enough to European royalty to trace their family trees back to the two monarchs I mentioned earlier; Charlemagne of France and Alfred the Great of England. In truth it probably goes back much further than that, to the Caesars and the Pharaohs of Rome and ancient Egypt. The remaining 9 or 10 either had lesser genetic ties to European royalty and nobility, or they were married to someone who did. What are the odds of that happening, given the massive genetic diversity in the USA? One in a googol-plex at least.

I've heard a lot of people say that if you don't vote, you don't have the right to complain about the system. In my opinion, that's bullshit. :sowrong::disgust: I don't vote because the system is rigged and there is no fair, democratic, representation in it. I think it's far more important to make your voice heard through whatever forum you can find. The media, the internet, TV, radio, letter to a newspaper, bothering the shit out of your MP or Congressman; whatever. Putting your cross on a slip of paper every four or five years to decide which Illuminate puppet you want to sit in the White House or Number 10 Downing Street, won't affect your life one bit. Vigorously campaigning for the end of party politics and the start of true democratic representation just might, if enough people wake up and smell their slavery.
 
amk714 said:
Thanks, BigJim, for trying to explain this to me. But...

WHO CARES? No offense to everyone who's posted on this topic! 🙂

Boy, Amk is gettin' grumpy in his old age. Shall we say "Wanka!!" together, BigJim, or as a seperate ensemble?

Btw, for those of you wanting to know, Moses is the OG Luminite.
Yeah, that's right, you heard me boy...

Cheers.😀
 
Moses25 said:


Boy, Amk is gettin' grumpy in his old age. Shall we say "Wanka!!" together, BigJim, or as a seperate ensemble?

Definatley together! 😀😀😀 Maybe that way the old tosser won't need his hearing trumpet to be able to pick it up. 😛
 
This is the thread Ann, let me know what you think.
 
What's New

2/22/2025
Visit Clips4Sale for the webs largest selection of fetish clips in one site!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top