Cherie Deville admitted she's not ticklish on TikTok

[Cyberknismo94]

This is why so many guys with a tickle fetish have an unrealistic expectation when it comes to tickling, and absurd standards. I think this is where a lot of "theories" comes from. Guys who think race or hair color matters, or that spots aren't ticklish, more ticklish, the oppression with brushes, thinking lotions and oils have any affect. To many tickle videos and not enough actual tickling experience. This is why legitimately ticklish models are a treasure.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e602/4c5a31dc00d0697e14db284151330ceca397.pdf
Actually there is a study about ticklishness and correlations but for some weird reasons you are stubbornly against any of that. Even for the sake of curiosity lol. This is really beyond annoying

 

[Hiphophooray2]

Uh yea....either she's lying thru her chattering teeth or that's not actually her answering. She is absolutely ticklish, and I've never really ever been much of a fan of hers. Lol

 

[duderino84]

Oh well. That's one less in the world to play with.

 

[jayson752003]

I know. Years ago, I had two models admit to me that they faked their videos. One of these models even stated that faking or exaggerating was very common in the industry. Recently, we have had several models come out publicly, and we still have people who will refuse to believe it. I go back to my example of Tickling Paradise's non-consensual tickling video. For years, I met people who claimed there was no way on earth that it was fake and that it had to be real. People wanted to believe it. Therefore it was real in their minds, and no amount of common sense would persuade them otherwise.

Anyone that doesnt see how anything dubbed "non-consentual" can be horse malarkey, needs to either go start on a new coloring book or get a lifetime membership to any local psychiatrist.

 

[Jon56]

I recently saw that video and was definitely disappointed. I know there's a lot of faking out there in videos but I thought Tickle Abuse was different. You think a company as big and popular as them would make their models sign a legal document or something to not disclose that information to the public since they claim their tickling content is real, especially if they know the models are faking. And if a company like Tickle Abuse did claim that she didn't know she was faking I wonder if Tickle Abuse ever addressed this and at least apologized since it seemed like they actually respected their customers and the tickling fetish community and know that some of their customer base feel cheated? I mean it can be argued that what she said damaged the credibility of Tickle Abuse and other companies she worked for which is a shame. I wonder if there have ever been any lawsuits or other consequences to models or companies for blatantly admitting to deceiving and misleading their customers? Especially if they are on the record saying they themselves are ticklish and then admitted they lied about it. It's like someone admitting they lied on a resume. And it's not like Cherie said she was just mildly ticklish or became desensitized. She basically admitted she's a fraud. And if all the companies know their models are faking it I think it's pretty funny how they ask the viewers to be honest and pay for their content and not watch it for free when they themselves aren't even honest themselves if that's the case. I feel like some people in the fetish community should form some kind of committee lol and investigate some of these companies and let the public know if they give their seal of a approval or not. I know there's always going to be faking but I don't think it's right when someone like her openly admits it. That's like a slap in the face because it's disrespectful. You know she knew her customers thought she was ticklish.

 

[COOLCAT88]

Anyone that doesnt see how anything dubbed "non-consentual" can be horse malarkey, needs to either go start on a new coloring book or get a lifetime membership to any local psychiatrist.

People actually think non consensual videos are real?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

 

[Jon56]

People actually think non consensual videos are real?

Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

A lot think the tickling part is, even if the models are cosplaying or playing a part in a skit. Kind of like when an authentically real ticklish couple roleplays and has a safe word when the tickling gets too intense. Some companies allow the viewers to see those are the kind of tickling videos they produce or at least lead the viewer on to think that's the kind of videos they produce because of the audition videos/interviews they film before the models act in a skit and even show behind the scenes footage and outtakes that looks like they are genuinely ticklish. Some people are upset because they feel cheated when they discover a model admits they were always faking it even after being shown pretending to be ticklish when they aren't playing a role. Of course they can argue they are always playing another character even behind the scenes, but not all models do that. Some people viewers care if a model is really ticklish, others don't. But anyway, I think everyone knows that no video a big professional tickling company puts out is never really nonconsensual since the models have a safe word and their are other people on set. But people thought at least they were really ticklish.

 

[Wolf]

Fetish performers are just that...performers.
Has no one ever explained that to you?

 

[frankied21]

Let's not forget that maybe there could be sarcasm amongst some models saying they aren't ticklish?

 

[Phineas]

Let's not forget that maybe there could be sarcasm amongst some models saying they aren't ticklish?

The autists on this forum don’t understand sarcasm

 

[jayson752003]

I disagree, there's plenty of incentive to lie. Not saying that's what Cherie (or Michelle Bauer) did in those instances, but regardless of whether someone did or didn't do something, there is a very real possibility that they simply don't want to be associated with it anymore.

A tickle model claiming she's not ticklish and was faking it the whole time is a good way to get people to leave her alone about it.

Yep this is correct!

 

[P[a]pi]

In general I think it's rare for gals to like to be tickled. So hypothetically if 50% or less of tickle models actually like being tickled, then of course a lot are faking it. Cus it's rough to let someone torture you, even for money, and especially over and over again.

If you see a gal in 1 clip, ticklish as hell, then never see her again, that girl is really ticklish. Cus she was like fuck this shit, never again lol.

 

[Xlproservices]

I call bs on the "admission"

 

[ihatethisyo]

It’s funny that this has been brought back up again.
Because I was doing a Cherie Deville deep dive recently. On several BDSM sites, that are not catering to tickle fetish, she has punishments done to her feet. The punishments themselves are not presented as intended to be tickling. And yet her reaction is that of being tickled.

I just made a post about this too. You can see it here: https://www.ticklingforum.com/threads/cherie-deville-negative-confirmation.438186/post-5834740

There seems to be this recurring theme of her not being able to prevent herself from having ticklish reactions in non-tickling shoots.

I think she’s a liar lol. There’s strong evidence that she’s in fact actually very ticklish.

 

[TickleYeti]

Ah, well that's a bummer if true I've not watched her stuff specifically, at least that I recall; but I also do skip over stuff when I get the vibe that a model is faking so it's possible I skipped her stuff.

Sounds like everyone has really gotten into exploring a lot of the implications too, but I guess one point worth considering is whether the studio (or any studio) has promised/sworn to only ever have ticklish models on. Like others have mentioned, if a model can pull off the faking sufficient to fool most users (easier I imagine as most users come into a clip already 'fizzy' lol), then it sounds like they've delivered a product to the satisfaction of the user. Suspension of disbelief is a factor for sure in stuff like this. Admittedly maybe there is a workaround where models can own up to being ticklish or not in their about page on a studio site or something, but maybe that undercuts profit? Hard to say.

Personally, I absolutely prefer a genuinely ticklish lee/switch in a clip, but even without that, I still get some value because I like to study the Ler techniques to up my game for my own private play, so it's a win all around haha

Definitely worth noting that physical appearance is a factor for many as well. In my aceness, I tend not to get hung up on looks. I'm not looking for some insane pornstar standard of beauty in women, I so greatly prefer women in their natural state (if that's the right word?) Comfortable and authentic (to the persons preferred look) is the most alluring to me, but also I don't personally feel like people should think they have to alter or "enhance" their appearance or personalities or traits to suit others, but I also freely admit to being a weird one amongst weird ones haha eclectic seems to be a weirdly fitting word for me at best lmao

AuDHD inspired word walls aside, idk if it has to be that deep. If she isn't ticklish and fakes like a champ, no stress just move on to other content if that's a hangup, or continue to enjoy it if it's not! Admittedly the troll in me wants to make a joke that yall probably can't tell that the women in your life are faking anyway, but that would be a troll comment purely to troll and totally unhelpful so I definitelyyyy won't make such a comment... 🤪

 

[Doriansenigma]

Truth be told; once a model is in so many videos in my mind they start to lose credibility as a ticklee anyway, unless they truly share this fetish and submit to the sensation. Being ticklish is one of those things you can learn to control especially after constant stimulation. I don’t know if that’s the case with her or not. I gravitate toward very amateur clips and stay away from more well known producers for this reason. With Tickle Abuse you could see the decline in the authenticity of their models as time went on. They hired more fetish models that constantly reappeared in their content as opposed to the random everyday women they used to tickle. She may be doing this to distance herself from tickling because as usual she’s probably getting DMs from a bunch of horny guys with tickle fetishes asking about her ticklishness and maybe she’s tired of it. Or maybe she’s telling the truth, but why care? It’s always a turn off to me when a woman isn’t ticklish so I won’t be consuming her content. (it’s not like I did anyway). There are plenty of genuinly ticklish women out there, so it seems silly to concern myself with her. One thing that strikes me as odd is that she has to know she’s discrediting the company she worked for by saying their content was faked…makes me wonder if there was a falling out of some kind. That’s just a wild theory of mine though.

 

[U.N.Owen]

Models do in fact lie sometimes. After the micro scandal when Cindy Schubert (I think that was the name) was on Joe Millionaire or whichever show it was and was outed as having been in tickling videos, TMZ did a segment on it (they were very dismissive of the idea that it was a scandal at all... "it's just tickling!" one of them said).

They interviewed her and asked "Are you really ticklish?" She replied "I'm actually not."

Her husband, standing next to her, gave a very dubious "Uhhhh..." and reached out a hand. She jumped out of his reach, and admitted "I'm not that good an actress."

So her instinct was to distance herself from the videos by denying being ticklish... until her husband called BS and threatened to prove it in front of the cameras.

 

[ihatethisyo]

Ah, well that's a bummer if true I've not watched her stuff specifically, at least that I recall

She may be doing this to distance herself from tickling

Sorry for the confusion guys, but this is actually an old thread.

It keeps getting bumped because new, or at least yet to be shared, findings are constantly being discovered that indicate that she may be lying (which is also my reason for continuing to update this old thread)

She’s easily the most debated “non-ticklish” model on this forum because nothing she says adds up lol and there’s plenty of evidence to prove otherwise that she’s in fact very ticklish.

 

[darvon96]

Models do in fact lie sometimes. After the micro scandal when Cindy Schubert (I think that was the name) was on Joe Millionaire or whichever show it was and was outed as having been in tickling videos, TMZ did a segment on it (they were very dismissive of the idea that it was a scandal at all... "it's just tickling!" one of them said).

They interviewed her and asked "Are you really ticklish?" She replied "I'm actually not."

Her husband, standing next to her, gave a very dubious "Uhhhh..." and reached out a hand. She jumped out of his reach, and admitted "I'm not that good an actress."

So her instinct was to distance herself from the videos by denying being ticklish... until her husband called BS and threatened to prove it in front of the cameras.

Absolutely correct! Her real name is Sara Kozar.

 

[TickleYeti]

Sorry for the confusion guys, but this is actually an old thread.

It keeps getting bumped because new, or at least yet to be shared, findings are constantly being discovered that indicate that she may be lying (which is also my reason for continuing to update this old thread)

She’s easily the most debated “non-ticklish” model on this forum because nothing she says adds up lol and there’s plenty of evidence to prove otherwise that she’s in fact very ticklish.

gotcha, forgot to peep the timestamps from the beginning, didn't realize it was a necro haha