Cherie DeVille negative confirmation

[TMF Jeff]

Is Michelle Bauer the same woman who went by the name Pia Snow?

I don't know that, but according to google the answer is yes 🙂

 

[ThatPayPhoneGuy]

Lmao what? That guy is such a moron. Incredible singer though.

It happened. His wife's picture is on this massive billboard the club has feature different girls on it. I think they were all dancers who'd been Toronto Sunshine Girls (they aren't topless in out paper, and these days they aren't even that hot anymore). Anyway he apparently went into the club and demanded they take the picture down. He also got in trouble at a place called Philmore's over a nude picture if her that was in the club.

 

[ThatPayPhoneGuy]

Here’s another take. Most of Cherie DeVille’s tickling content is pirated and widely available on free sites. She’s likely making no money on them, so why not devalue them?

She makes tickling videos. They’re demonetized through piracy. She says she’s faking being ticklish. Tickling fetishists stop watching said videos.

(Except for the forensic tickling experts who are now likely analyzing every giggle, gasp, toe clench, and muscle contraction.)

Almost all adult stuff is pirated, unfortunately I think it's driven alot of good producers out of the industry. It still doesn't do her any good to say she isn't weather she is or not. Blowing the Kayfabe like they would kill anybody wanting to hire her for future work.

 

[ThatPayPhoneGuy]

This is a good point, because later in her career Michelle Bauer claimed that her tickling videos were fake, and there is no way her painful-looking spasms and inability to breathe were faked. I think she just wanted to distance herself from her early fetish work because she was deep into her screen queen career.

She also moved on to Mainstream work, mostly B-Movies, but mainstream none the less, so her lying might make sense. But hey, it's all fantasy anyway. Do you think all the orgasms in porn are Real? It wouldn't surprise me if some of the reactions, from some girls are either faked or played up for the camera... Why you'd spill the beans and ruin it for your fans is a different matter all together.

 

[Jon56]

Why would she bring it up at all then? That's like when Sebastian Back from Skid Row lost his shit at the Brass Rail strip club in Toronto because his wife is featured on their massive sign. 99.9% of the human race probably had no idea who she is , all he did was bring attention to her being on their sign and get arrested at the same time.

Because people keep asking her and if she's still trying to get acting gigs she may as well use it to her advantage since it's out there. Just like an actor might cheat to make themselves cry like sniff an onion but then say it was their acting skills lol.

 

[ThatPayPhoneGuy]

Because people keep asking her and if she's still trying to get acting gigs she may as well use it to her advantage since it's out there. Just like an actor might cheat to make themselves cry like sniff an onion but then say it was their acting skills lol.

Still doesn't make sense. I've been to her instagram page, and it's not a particularly "classy" set-up.

 

[TickleSlaveinTn]

Say it ain't so! Say it ain't so! I mean faking an orgasm, that I can understand, but tickling? This is more worse than when I found out wrestling was fake. Someone please blue pill me! lol JK, I always knew some were faking it. I was just surprised to hear it happened from tickling abuse. Do the directors and ticklers know they are faking it most of the time and coach/direct the ticklees or do they deceive even them? Anyway I can understand how being more ticklish can depend on your mood and how some people become desensitized to it. I don't blame those models for still trying to put on a good show for their fans but the models who aren't ticklish at all really annoy me. Especially if they admit it. It's like a Santa Clause actor telling kids they are just pretending when they think think they are not. Good thing there's plenty of real life mainstream videos out there now along with couples and friends who make their own amateur video clips for people's pleasure.

Good comparison. No one wants to hear it's faked. It's sort of like insulting your audience.

 

[TickleSlaveinTn]

Is Michelle Bauer the same woman who went by the name Pia Snow?

I googled Pia Snow and it led me to Michelle Bauer's wikipedia page.

 

[shark]

Sarah Kozer/Cindy Schubert also made similar claims after leaving fetish work.
https://www.ticklingforum.com/threa...-if-shes-really-ticklish.165447/#post-2421374

 

[ihatethisyo]

I asked Cherie the question again today on her OF live stream and she gave the same exact scripted answer: “Nope not at all. And I’ve never ever been ticklish anywhere on my body”. It was quite the long winded response amidst a sea of other questions waiting to be answered lol

I then follow up by asking her to prove it and she says “how can I prove it? I can’t tickle myself and there’s no one else here to tickle me”.

Honestly I think it’s quite interesting that she’s always so eager to answer the question. And she spends so much time telling people that she’s not ticklish whenever it’s asked.

Keep in mind, this is a live stream chat where so many people send messages and she could easily ignore mine if she really wanted to.


At the end of the day, she could be telling the truth. But in my opinion the consistent long winded responses to the question combined with the fact that she doesn’t bother to prove it (despite comments asking her to) makes me think that she’s just embarrassed of her past and that she’s trying to save face.

Just my opinion

 

[Marvel_Tickling]

I think if anything, her consistency leads me to believe she's telling the truth. Just because we want it to be true, doesn't make it so.

 

[ihatethisyo]

I think if anything, her consistency leads me to believe she's telling the truth. Just because we want it to be true, doesn't make it so.

That’s completely fair. I think the reason we debate so much about Cherie is because she’s by far the most convincingly ticklish in her tickleabuse videos. She would easily take the title as the most skilled faker if she’s telling the truth.

I remember even Kelli Sage mentioned on Reddit that she believes Cherie was legitimately ticklish .. and she was the one that actually tickled her.

All this to say however, I personally think there’s enough evidence to suggest that Cherie could be trying to deflect haha. I don’t think I’ll ever believe her until she proves it in a video.

But I’m happy to be proven wrong

 

[ticklishguy1985]

I asked Cherie the question again today on her OF live stream and she gave the same exact scripted answer: “Nope not at all. And I’ve never ever been ticklish anywhere on my body”. It was quite the long winded response amidst a sea of other questions waiting to be answered lol

I then follow up by asking her to prove it and she says “how can I prove it? I can’t tickle myself and there’s no one else here to tickle me”.

Honestly I think it’s quite interesting that she’s always so eager to answer the question. And she spends so much time telling people that she’s not ticklish whenever it’s asked.

Keep in mind, this is a live stream chat where so many people send messages and she could easily ignore mine if she really wanted to.


At the end of the day, she could be telling the truth. But in my opinion the consistent long winded responses to the question combined with the fact that she doesn’t bother to prove it (despite comments asking her to) makes me think that she’s just embarrassed of her past and that she’s trying to save face.

Just my opinion

So counter arguments

She’s likely eager to answer the question because those asking are subscribers and pleasing the libido of your customer is a good plan to keep them a customer. I’m more surprised she’s denying it in the sense she could garner more subs if she kept leaning into the idea she is ticklish. I think though her willingness to answer said question is honestly just the nature of a subscriber based content model and ignoring it could turn over tributes. I’m just curious what she would be “embarrassed” about. She’s producing step-mom content and there was TikTok where she was dressed as a Who from Dr Seus for spicy content. Not downgrading her work or those who consume it, just saying that I don’t think doing BDSM and tickling content is something to be embarrassed about when you’re making spicy content for OF. I mean you could always offer to pay for a custom of her “proving” it and see if she takes up your offer.

 

[ihatethisyo]

So counter arguments

She’s likely eager to answer the question because those asking are subscribers and pleasing the libido of your customer is a good plan to keep them a customer. I’m more surprised she’s denying it in the sense she could garner more subs if she kept leaning into the idea she is ticklish. I think though her willingness to answer said question is honestly just the nature of a subscriber based content model and ignoring it could turn over tributes. I’m just curious what she would be “embarrassed” about. She’s producing step-mom content and there was TikTok where she was dressed as a Who from Dr Seus for spicy content. Not downgrading her work or those who consume it, just saying that I don’t think doing BDSM and tickling content is something to be embarrassed about when you’re making spicy content for OF. I mean you could always offer to pay for a custom of her “proving” it and see if she takes up your offer.

I agree with you. I don’t think it’s “embarrassing” for her to shoot BDSM, tickling, or OF content. But I think a large reason for that is because she can just brush it all off as acting. No different than being a Hollywood actor. And I actually think that’s why she claims the tickling was acting as well.

I would assume she would feel much more embarrassed if she openly acknowledged that her step mom character is her actual fetish and that she actually gets off on it. So in a way, it makes sense to acknowledge that everything you do is acting because you remove any sort of liability.

Either way, I did offer to try and pay for a custom of her proving she’s not ticklish, but it’s actually ridiculously hard to contact her on OF because her DMs are definitely screened by a team of people and not her. So unfortunately I don’t know if I’ll be able to ever make that happen.

 

[ihatethisyo]

Not to keep belaboring the topic, but there’s one last thing! I’m not sure if this has been posted already but she did answer with this positive confirmation on her twitter back in 2014.

https://x.com/CherieDeVille/status/543631078607433728

So one thing is for sure. She was either lying then or she is lying now.

Will be interesting to see if this tweet now “magically disappears” lol

 

[Jon56]

Not to keep belaboring the topic, but there’s one last thing! I’m not sure if this has been posted already but she did answer with this positive confirmation on her twitter back in 2014.

https://x.com/CherieDeVille/status/543631078607433728

So one thing is for sure. She was either lying then or she is lying now.

Will be interesting to see if this tweet now “magically disappears” lol

Love this! lol Now fans who are upset can show this to her and call her out for spreading fake news lol. That's what she gets for lying and ruining the fantasy for a lot of her tickle fetish fans lol. Because of her I don't enjoy tickle abuse as much anymore but after seeing that old tweet I definitely feel a little better lol.

 

[ihatethisyo]

Love this! lol Now fans who are upset can show this to her and call her out for spreading fake news lol. That's what she gets for lying and ruining the fantasy for a lot of her tickle fetish fans lol. Because of her I don't enjoy tickle abuse as much anymore but after seeing that old tweet I definitely feel a little better lol.

Like I mentioned earlier, I’m never going to believe her until she proves it. The fact that she has never even once tried to prove it despite being asked so many times is suspicious enough. Not to mention all the overly elaborate answers that she gives every time she is asked the question lol

Finding that old tweet was the last piece of evidence I needed to be convinced that she was lying.

At this point I wonder if she just had a really horrible experience with TA. And that this entire act is just her trying her best to tarnish their name.

 

[Deadlysmile22]

Well if these reactions are fake, then give this lady an oscar! 😀

 

[ihatethisyo]

Well if these reactions are fake, then give this lady an oscar! 😀

I know right?! I personally think the glistening sweat is an obvious giveaway that it’s not fake.

I really just want to know why she felt the need to lie. There must be something that we don’t know about.

 

[-Venom-]

Has there ever been a negative confirmation where there hasn’t been a reply of “I don’t believe her” or “she’s lying” or “I could change that” or words to that effect?

It wouldn’t really matter what she said, people are just gonna not believe it and believe what they want to believe anyway.

 

[holleygolightly]

Do you guys seriously think it is that difficult to fake the reactions in that trailer above? Like, have you ever had a tickle session in real life? I mean come on...

It wouldn’t really matter what she said, people are just gonna not believe it and believe what they want to believe anyway.

This. In the end, people will always just see what they want to see. Can't believe this is still being discussed after almost 3 months lol, why does it even matter to you lot if some random person you will never meet in your life is ticklish or not?

 

[ihatethisyo]

Do you guys seriously think it is that difficult to fake the reactions in that trailer above? Like, have you ever had a tickle session in real life? I mean come on...

Has there ever been a negative confirmation where there hasn’t been a reply of “I don’t believe her” or “she’s lying” or “I could change that” or words to that effect?

It wouldn’t really matter what she said, people are just gonna not believe it and believe what they want to believe anyway.

have y’all been reading the discussion recently? It sounds like y’all are just chiming without reading the updated context of the comments. I personally was not making my judgment based on the trailer.

She straight up said she was ticklish years ago here:

https://twitter.com/x/status/543631078607433728

I wouldn’t care if she just told the truth. But one way or another she lied and I’m more interested in the reason behind that.

 

[-Venom-]

have y’all been reading the discussion recently? It sounds like y’all are just chiming without reading the updated context of the comments. I personally was not making my judgment based on the trailer.

She straight up said she was ticklish years ago here:

https://twitter.com/x/status/543631078607433728

I wouldn’t care if she just told the truth. But one way or another she lied and I’m more interested in the reason behind that.

I mean, that doesn't change anything I said whatsoever, I asked when was the last time that there was a negative confirmation without those replies and I said no matter what she says people won't believe her, which you just have proven correct as you don't believe the negative and others don't believe the positive.

Now I don't know her, or her videos but those tweets are from 2014 while the negative confirmation is more recent. Being a decade ago she was probably still selling content (this is just a guess on my part, I don't know the actual time frame of her work) but if it was during the time of her content she's hardly gonna say no, because she wants to sell more stuff lol

My point still stands, people are gonna believe what they wanna believe, it's literally pointless arguing it either way

 

[ihatethisyo]

I mean, that doesn't change anything I said whatsoever, I asked when was the last time that there was a negative confirmation without those replies and I said no matter what she says people won't believe her, which you just have proven correct as you don't believe the negative and others don't believe the positive.

Now I don't know her, or her videos but those tweets are from 2014 while the negative confirmation is more recent. Being a decade ago she was probably still selling content (this is just a guess on my part, I don't know the actual time frame of her work) but if it was during the time of her content she's hardly gonna say no, because she wants to sell more stuff lol

My point still stands, people are gonna believe what they wanna believe, it's literally pointless arguing it either way

That’s fine, I respect your opinion and I understand where you’re coming from. I agree that people will just believe what they believe. Nothing wrong with some good discussion and bantering though right? Haha

I won’t speak on behalf of everyone, but for me personally, I usually believe the model if it’s a negative admission. Just not the case here with Cherie.

In my opinion Cherie is the most debated and the most polarizing model on this forum and for good reason. She’s mainstream and she’s offered more conflicting information than any other model on this site.

So I don’t fully agree with what you’re saying about how every negative admission is met with the same response. But again, I won’t speak for anyone else here but just myself.

 

[Hiphophooray2]

I don't remember her. Maybe she didn't do very many videos? Or did she use a different name? One thing's for sure, if I'm ever thinking about getting some old Tickle Abuse content, I guess I'll pass on hers if she's admitting she's not really ticklish. I guess it doesn't affect her because they probably got paid a one-time fee and don't get royalties (my assumption, at least).

She's been in probably more tickle videos than most others if not all others. And alot of them were pretty good actually.