ManInDistress
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2012
- Messages
- 213
- Points
- 18
Non consensual has always been my thing, the restrains, the begging, the helplessness, and the humiliation are all aspects of tickling for me.
I'm curious: which one do you like more, a girl who you tickle non-consensually or a girl who asks for it? I personally prefer it when a girl WANTS me to tickle her, but that's a lot rarer than tickling a girl without her permission. A lot of people seem to preferthe non-consensual, which I get, in a way.
Very curious about your opinions!
Consensual non consent xD
I've often thought about having a lady allow me to tickle her, even if she doesn't like it. For instance, let's say a lady is about to be evicted or have her car repossessed, and you make a deal with her to bail her out of the trouble she's in, but she has to suffer through intense tickle torture. While many would say that is taking advantage of a situation, it's not force. If she says no, she's in no worse shape than she is now. If she says yes, and suffers through it, both parties get what they want. It's consensual because she is allowing it, but not consensual because she's suffering. In short, she's agreeing to something she doesn't want. Just what comes to mind when the question is asked.
I've often thought about having a lady allow me to tickle her, even if she doesn't like it. For instance, let's say a lady is about to be evicted or have her car repossessed, and you make a deal with her to bail her out of the trouble she's in, but she has to suffer through intense tickle torture. While many would say that is taking advantage of a situation, it's not force. If she says no, she's in no worse shape than she is now. If she says yes, and suffers through it, both parties get what they want. It's consensual because she is allowing it, but not consensual because she's suffering. In short, she's agreeing to something she doesn't want. Just what comes to mind when the question is asked.
Let me ask you this, does it matter to you if tickling doesn't make her suffer? (Without leaping to the idea that she just hasn't been lerred by YOU before, and that you would surely break her if given the shot.)
Hypothetically, she says "What? I'm ticklish but it's not at all torture to me. I certainly don't want you putting your hands on me, though." Assuming she went through with it, she laughs while being tickled, but shows no signs of distress, never begs/pleads, looks bored in between tickles as opposed to frightened or desperate.
The idea of intentionally causing genuine discomfort seems counterintuitive to the whole process.
What process?
Tickling. I see it as a pleasurable activity.
If by 'proposal', you mean 'blackmail someone into providing him with sexual gratification'...dunno. I guess that's up to him.That's why I was asking whether Maggot's pleasure is contingent upon the lee's suffering. The scenario put forth hinted as such, but I was just wondering. That is, would Maggot 'help' get the woman out of trouble with this "I tickle you" proposal if she doesn't find the tickling, itself, at all torturous?
If by 'proposal', you mean 'blackmail someone into providing him with sexual gratification'...dunno. I guess that's up to him.
I've often thought about having a lady allow me to tickle her, even if she doesn't like it. For instance, let's say a lady is about to be evicted or have her car repossessed, and you make a deal with her to bail her out of the trouble she's in, but she has to suffer through intense tickle torture. While many would say that is taking advantage of a situation, it's not force. If she says no, she's in no worse shape than she is now. If she says yes, and suffers through it, both parties get what they want. It's consensual because she is allowing it, but not consensual because she's suffering. In short, she's agreeing to something she doesn't want. Just what comes to mind when the question is asked.
Yeah I bet that's what a certain Hollywood producer who tells an actress she can have the part if she give him head thinks. "She can say no, it's consensual! And if she says yes, everyone get what they want."
As for me, if someone ever comes to me or my wife with such a proposition I think I'll nonconsensually go break the bastard in two.
Coercion is great fetish fuel no doubt. There's a 90's flick with Robert Redford about that. But in reality (as it happens alas too often) it's disgusting.
EDIT: I re-read my post. I'm sorry if it came out harsh: I am not accusing you of anything, naturally, and I understand you were talking in a completely hypothetical way. Please take no offense. I do stand by my point though~
Let me ask you this, does it matter to you if tickling doesn't make her suffer? (Without leaping to the idea that she just hasn't been lerred by YOU before, and that you would surely break her if given the shot.)
Hypothetically, she says "What? I'm ticklish but it's not at all torture to me. I certainly don't want you putting your hands on me, though." Assuming she went through with it, she laughs while being tickled, but shows no signs of distress, never begs/pleads, looks bored in between tickles as opposed to frightened or desperate.
Sure. In the scenario, I take it that he is like the repo man, and he is going to pay what she owes monetarily if she endures tickling. Or, more likely, that he has the power to just rip up the order, wipe it from the books, sweep it under the rug.
But I was asking whether it would matter, to Maggot, if she didn't find tickling torturous.
Nope, I'm not the repo man. I didn't come out and say that, but I did say "bail her out." That's not the same as "forgive the debt." Tenebrae picked up that the assumption here is an outside party saying "I can stop this from happening" as opposed to "Do Action X or I'll do Action Z."
Not a factor. However, for me anyway, tickling can be a sadism. Part of what I enjoy about it is watching the lady squirm and try to get away. She may be enjoying it, but she's still squirming and trying to get away. Most fantasies I've seen involve this. See my response to Tenebrae.
If by 'proposal', you mean 'blackmail someone into providing him with sexual gratification'...dunno. I guess that's up to him.