Do you prefer consentual or nonconsentual tickling?

[QBWeaver]

I think "All of the above" would also be a good category here.

 

[Iggy pop]

Consensual. (That's the correct spelling, look it up!) I won't always ask for permission, but if she doesn't like being tickled I won't do it, at least not often. Non-con fantasy, OK. Non-con reality, not so OK. What can I say, I'm a nice guy! 😀

What is non-consensual tickling and consensual tickling anyway? Is Consenual tickling strictly asking for permission to tickle someone? If so then I would have to say 90% of my tickling exploits are non-consenual. If someone, however, has an adverse reaction to the tickling like crying, screaming, or extreme anger I'll stop immediately and apologize. I like my tickling on the teasing and playful side, and I'm not looking to completely humilate someone. On the otherhand, asking for permission every time would often ruin the spontaneity of the tickling.

 

[RaeRae24]

I view non-consensual tickling as the 'lee either being angry, crying, hurt, or just totally not enjoying the tickling in any way shape or form. Consensual, to me, doesn't mean that the 'lee lays there in complete submission to the tickling, but they ARE enjoying it, in that torturous type of way. ya know? 😀

 

[ChosenofMystra]

Consentual tickling. Nonconsentual outside of fantasy is akin to rape in my eyes. Its much more fun when both 'ler and 'lee enjoy the experiance.

 

[tkl-pen]

In a movie, nonconsensual tickle torture in tight bondage - in real, role play of the former.

 

[Anna6-9]

Im on the fence.

As a ler I guess it would have to be consentual. But its the lee side of this thats throwing me. It always starts out consentual but when I get pushed past what I can take and it goes into the nonconsent side of the coin..... at the time Im screaming and get kinda mad but its so freaking cool at the same time. Im sure this doesnt make sense. I'll shut up now.

 

[TicklesFemales]

Anna6-9

It does make sense, what you have is a love/hate relationship with being tickled, you love it but hate it at the same time. That is normal....

TicklesFemales

 

[Babbles]

In fantasy, no problem. (Wordy as usual...)

Consentual tickling. Nonconsentual outside of fantasy is akin to rape in my eyes. Its much more fun when both 'ler and 'lee enjoy the experiance.

I agree, non-con in fantasy only. (Even there I feel a bit guilty...)

I wouldn't personally do this unless I felt sure the guy would regard it positively, and then I'd be cautious and do it, if at all,
very briefly and privately so as not to embarrass him, as someone else wrote,
but I can only see a very quick, superficial non-con "surprise attack"
under those circumstances.

Certainly not more than a couple of seconds, and definitely not ever if the person is restrained or trapped, stuck in any way.

I probably wouldn't anyway, in case the person wouldn't welcome even that.

In any sort of "rape fantasy" or "force fantasy"
(obviously not possible, if it's rape/forced it's unwilling by definition)
the person fantasizes about someone OF THEIR CHOICE
doing WHAT THEY WANT DONE TO THEM,
so even if someone enjoys the idea of non-consensual tickling,

they may only want that with one person, or one sort of person, and only in a certain manner ----

---Otherwise it's an invasion of privacy, personal space, and could be highly uncomfortable, irritating or even painful, as others mentioned.

Since I don't know what (or who) another person would secretly want,
I wouldn't impose myself upon them.

Personal preference is a combination, from the considerate person of my choosing, more preferably from/to a "significant other."

 

[maniactickler]

If its myself doing the tickling, it would have to be consensual. but if im being a voyeur, i love non consensual.