Because its age-restricted and I don't feel like creating an account just to view it, I can't comment on it. While I'm not going to bash something I haven't seen, I can't consider AI art to be real art. To be fair, the whole point of art is to be subjective and objective when viewing it, but as an artist, AI can never truly replicate what a human is capable of in terms of creativity. I'm fine with using digital tools to create art, but I wouldn't call AI a tool, and what deeply concerns me is someone who has no creative ability now calling them an "artist" when all they did was put prompts into a computer program. I'm not very knowledgeable about fixing cars, so I'm perfectly happy with knowing I'd be incapable of being an auto technician.
Although I do see AI as pointless because there's no reason for technology to become humanized, I have made a post on here talking about having foot fetish and tickle sessions with chat bots, but I also made it clear that it can never replace a human interaction. While people can fantasize, I get that they want to act out that fantasy but don't have someone to do so with (ex: wanting a woman to play Taylor Swift but can't find anyone irl who looks like her).