How will tickling content creators combat the tidal wave that is AI?

[timyanncik]

I think that AI art retains the issue that it's primarily shit. Like, deviantart has been overwhelmed by AI generated tickle porn for ages, but luckily for deviantart tickle artists, most of it is garbage images of the same AI woman with different hairstyles laughing while a hand is vaguely in the area. Making good AI art is possible, but it isn't easy, quick or something that some random person can just do with a chatgtp account.

The AI art we're worried about is going to be no different from the streams of crude sketches or poorly written 3 sentence "tickle stories" already clogging smut sites - most content creators are already going to be able to compete against it by virtue of making art that's good.

I wouldnt say its shit. I create AI images with AI for my deviant art page and I am doing decently well with my page. I really take time to generate images, sometimes I need to redefine the parameters for 2 hours just for one picture, its not the same work as drawing bit it is work. for anyone interested in my page: https://www.deviantart.com/snickertickler

 

[hopefulscrambl]

I wouldnt say its shit. I create AI images with AI for my deviant art page and I am doing decently well with my page. I really take time to generate images, sometimes I need to redefine the parameters for 2 hours just for one picture, its not the same work as drawing bit it is work. for anyone interested in my page: https://www.deviantart.com/snickertickler

Sure, but if you're spending 2 hours on a single picture, you're not the problem. You're competing with traditional artists in the conventional sense, not in the AI sense

What was being discusses with the rapidly churned out one-prompt images, and they're broadly shit. As I said, it's not that different from churned out drawings or stories, which have always been a problem.