heretichero666
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2011
- Messages
- 253
- Points
- 0
Erratic, that's actually an interesting idea that it's entirely the other way around from what I was suspecting. Naturally, I could imagine how being attracted to what might be considered a more deviant sexual practice could result in someone sequestering themselves. Your own experience with your fetishes shying you away from more typical sex even has a familiarity to it; it's a difficult topic to broach with a partner, and sex without the fetish can indeed be unrewarding. You present a good "egg before the chicken," you might say.
Feathers, you're right that it seems the question does in fact suggest, but I didn't mean to say that the fetish only emerges as a place holder for sex nor that it wasn't as erotic in its own right. In fact, tickling is entirely erotic because of the intimacy that must take place between the people participating in it.
I would hesitate to agree completely on the turnover of its fetishists, though. You and I have both haunted this site for years, but there's many people who've come and gone during that time as well. Still, I don't mean to say it's only a stop gap form of sexuality, evidenced even in myself as I've long since become sexually active, and I do enjoy that, but all of my fetishes remain even the ones that developed alongside tickling at an early age. But you do raise several good points, and it's an excellent argument for tickling independent of a sheltered upbringing.
Finally, my use of the word "normal" stems, I think, from the community's perspective. Most people in my experience here separate the fetish from "mainstream" practices, which implies a departure from normalcy.
I certainly agree that tickling fetish can stem from more than just a sheltered upbringing and I for one don't feel that tickling is a replacement for actual sexual experiences. I lost my virginity and it was something better than what I could ever imagine or do with myself and some tickle related medium to pleasure me. My fetishes still remain and I don't think that they will ever leave me and I don't think I want them to because they make me a part of who I am in my opinion.
As for the whole "normal" thing, I agree its more of a reflection on mainstream sexual ideas and fantasies which are all up to the beholder to determine is right or not. However, even within our own community of tickle/foot fetishists, I believe that there is a certain line that is drawn amongst us. There are those of us who enjoy the fetish and still value the "normal"/"typical" aspects of sex and sexual experiences but then there are those who think and care about nothing but feet and tickling to the point its unhealthy. I see it on deviantart.com all the time. Guys will look at full body photos or pictures of characters drawn barefoot and talk about nothing but the feet shown in the piece and want nothing else. I remember going onto the page of one kid who made a stamp that said "Boobs and Vaginas Are Gross" which not only shocked me but made me think "How does this guy expect to share his life with anyone let alone do anything with it when the only thing he cares about in a woman is the part of her body that applies to his fetish which he can indulge in while not caring for the other person".
Its really a hard thing to think about/discuss because not only is it a fetish that isn't mainstream but its one that holds a lot of psychology which really has to be observed.